:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30. januar 2007 16:54
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What hw to use for loadbalancing
The cheapest option would be to roll something yourself. There are many
options available for nice loadbalancing set up using linux and setting
up 2 boxes, so that should one die, the other one
Look into CoyotePoint
We use Cisco Netscalers which I think are cheaper than the F5 but I'm not
completely sure about that. I know that CoyotePoint makes some nicer
entry-level LBs
Dave Ross
http://www.coldspringframework.org
Hello,
What (lower priced) options other than F5 Big IP LTM have I
WebSite CFtalk wrote:
The problem is not always there, but happens especially with one
customer using clustered terminal servers and Internet Explorer.
It seems that they are always connected to one of the cluster nodes
Are the terminal servers in the same subnet as your cluster? If so, what
better than Windows NLB clustering on most aspects?
Helge
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31. januar 2007 09:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What hw to use for loadbalancing
WebSite CFtalk wrote:
The problem is not always there, but happens
I run Windows NLB on 2 cf7 enterprise servers each with 2 clustered
instances of CF - to be honest, I've never had any problem
whatsoever. Uptime of the servers was up till recently just shy of 600
days (and that's on Windows - and don't go on about not applying
patches etc) CF has been rock
Hello,
What (lower priced) options other than F5 Big IP LTM have I got when I
need to loadbalance 3 CFMX servers?
3 x CFMX 7.x Enterprise on W2003 / IIS6
F5 is a bit expensive -18kUSD for Big-IP LTM 1500
What I basically need is something that works better than W2003 NLB.
(and not to difficult
WebSite CFtalk wrote:
What I basically need is something that works better than W2003 NLB.
(and not to difficult to establish/maintain)
When JRun/CF dies behind the NLB cluster, the cluster is happily
continuing its loadbalancing as if nothing happened.
Did you cluster JRun or just IIS?
) solution using something like linuxvirtualserver.
LVS Kiss looks like a simple solution to set up that supports health
checking.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: WebSite CFtalk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: What hw to use
be a better and more stable/powerful solution.
Helge
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30. januar 2007 16:41
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What hw to use for loadbalancing
WebSite CFtalk wrote:
What I basically need is something that works better
9 matches
Mail list logo
