not to know how to do it,
they're usually
no good at writing beginners' tutorials...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Rebecca Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 5:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: just noticed this when validating email
Rick:
JavaScript will elevate the low
-
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 29 maart 2005 16:04
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: just noticed this when validating email
You're right...customers do expect more...I'm trying to keep up!
(Somewhat
:o)
(Still using CF 4.5.2! :o)
I wish I could find more
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: just noticed this when validating email
There are enough people willing to help you. If you want some guidance
with javascript and truly want to invest some time in it, just ask. I am
not a writer but passionate enough to ramble about it for hours.
Micha Schopman
Project
Hey, I forgot to add...I do appreciate the offer and just might
take you up on it!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: just noticed this when validating email
There are enough people
-Original Message-
From: Rebecca Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 5:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: just noticed this when validating email
Rick:
JavaScript will elevate the low-level work you currently do now to more
professional, full-featured applications that users
Thanks for the advice and encouragement, Rebecca! :o)
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Rebecca Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: just noticed this when validating email
Start by picking up the Visual Quickstart Guide
!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: just noticed this when validating email
Yeah, the file fields was me too.
You don't do a server request, you do it all client-side with
javascript. I
Rick- yes, there is a Javascript For Dummies.
I first encountered JavaScript using Thau's JavaScript Tutorial at
Webmonkey. Might want to give it a try- it's a good first brush kind of
thing.
http://webmonkey.wired.com/webmonkey/programming/javascript/tutorials/tu
torial1.html
Matt Osbun
Web
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 12:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: just noticed this when validating email
Rick, I understand where you're coming from. Years ago I really struggled
with learning Javascript. I hated it and really resisted it, but realized
that it is an inescapably
cfif getquery.theID EQ blablah
do this
/cfif
The same thing in JS goes somethin like this.
if (getquery.theId == blablah) {
doThis();
}
Seems similar to me :)
Symbollic language is powerful in that it gives those who speak it a
common vocabulary that lets them express like ideas without
Thanks, Matt...I'll check it out.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Matt Osbun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: just noticed this when validating email
Rick- yes, there is a Javascript For Dummies.
I first encountered JavaScript using
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 1:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: just noticed this when validating email
cfif getquery.theID EQ blablah
do this
/cfif
The same thing in JS goes somethin like this.
if (getquery.theId == blablah) {
doThis();
}
Seems similar to me :)
Symbollic
Rick:
JavaScript will elevate the low-level work you currently do now to more
professional, full-featured applications that users have come to expect.
Certainly, you must want to know how to make your web pages more dymamic and
your forms more secure and accurate, yes? Perhaps you'd like to be
But Will...
JS is client-side, and CF is server-side...
The whole universe could convert to CF (and I'd probably be out of a
job!) and we'd still need JS or something like it (unless, with the
mass conversion, MM created a CF-based browser that could use CF
With all due respect you missed my
I do see your point... and further, I still disagree...
With all due respect, is the AND comparison operator.
And == is the IS comparison operator.
My point was that JS isn't all that hard to read and write once you learn it.
My new point is that if all languages were as easy to write as CF,
Typos, typos...
i=i+1, for one... not i=1+1.
And as far as preferring the JS-style syntax in cfscript, it's a style
thing. It looks better and is less cluttered... I definitely use more
tag-style code than cfscript, but I also use cfscript wherever I can
simply to produce cleaner, more readable
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 March 2005 19:14
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: just noticed this when validating email
I do see your point... and further, I still disagree...
With all due respect, is the AND comparison operator.
And == is the IS comparison operator.
My point was that JS isn't all that hard
With all due respect you missed my point. Or maybe I didn't
make it clear. It wasnt to get rid of JS, but rather for it
to written as easily as CF. CF makes sense.
cfif getquery.theID EQ blablah
do this
/cfif
The same thing in JS goes somethin like this.
for (i=0;ig.length;i++)
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:46:26 -0400, Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so I exaggerated, but who's the numb skull that came up with ++ and ??
And ==?
Kernighan and Ritchie, when they invented C I think. But there are far
worse syntactic monstrosities out there. C++ has a delightful
Learnin alot here from you guys.
But there *must* be quite a few of us that don't like JS, don't take the time
to write it ourselves because it takes much longer than writing:
cfinput name=search type=text required=yes message=Please enter a
search term
I use that one all the time. lol
But there *must* be quite a few of us that don't like JS,
don't take the time to write it ourselves because it takes
much longer than writing:
cfinput name=search type=text required=yes
message=Please enter a search term
I use that one all the time. lol
In exchange for having
I know this one is a little obvious, but I hadn't thought about it until I
tried it.
I let users enter an email address or multiple emails separated by commas to
send and item to a friend.
If I validate the email address using cfinput, you can't enter more than one
email. If you do, you get
Just have one field per email address, and a button/link next to the
field that will dynamically add some more fields for more email
addresses. That way people can add as many emails as they want, but
each one will be a separate field for validation and processsing.
cheers,
barneyb
On Sat, 26
]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 1:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: just noticed this when validating email
Just have one field per email address, and a button/link next to the
field that will dynamically add some more fields for more email
addresses. That way people can add as many emails as they want
Yeah, the file fields was me too.
You don't do a server request, you do it all client-side with
javascript. I didn't test this, but here's the general idea:
script type=text/javascript
window.emailFieldCount = 1;
function addField() {
var div = document.getElementById(fieldContainer);
]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: just noticed this when validating email
Yeah, the file fields was me too.
You don't do a server request, you do it all client-side with
javascript. I didn't test this, but here's the general idea:
script type=text/javascript
Flash != RIA, and RIA != Flash. Flash does happen to be one of the
more common means of building RIAs, but it's not the only one. I
don't really have any good JS howtos to point you at. I'm always a
fan of books for hard-core concept learning, so I'd check out your
local book store.
cheers,
Flash != RIA, and RIA != Flash. Flash does happen to be one of the
more common means of building RIAs, but it's not the only one. I
don't really have any good JS howtos to point you at. I'm always a
fan of books for hard-core concept learning, so I'd check out your
local book store.
This is
But Will...
JS is client-side, and CF is server-side...
The whole universe could convert to CF (and I'd probably be out of a
job!) and we'd still need JS or something like it (unless, with the
mass conversion, MM created a CF-based browser that could use CF
client-side too).
JS is a C++ or
29 matches
Mail list logo
