Re: VPS Hosting

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Cobb
I've got a KickAssVPS server that I've had for a while and I've been very happy with it, and just got another one last Friday. I now know what you mean about support. My new server went down over the weekend, and their Emergency 911 Support hasn't even bothered to contact me back about it

Re: Fuseguard processing time

2011-06-13 Thread Peter Boughton
200ms is still a good page load time. Not when the original was 20ms! A page that takes 0.2s to load is no longer instant, there's a detectable delay, which isn't good. Does it really take 145ms to check for SQL Injection? :/ What's it doing that takes that long!?

Re: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Jerry Barnes
That being said - if you don't like CFEclipse or CFBuilder and want to move to something more modern, _definitely_ check out Dreamweaver CS 5.5. I'm really, _really_ digging it lately especially in terms of how well it supports JavaScript. It's only a matter of time. I am slowly migrating to

Re: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Peter Boughton
After punching all that data in I was walking to the card reader with them in one huge stack and I tripped... I've heard a similar story a few times, and I don't get it. If I had a large stack of cards, especially one that had to stay ordered, I'd get a piece of string and make a quick

Re: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Roger Austin
Peter Boughton bought...@gmail.com wrote: After punching all that data in I was walking to the card reader with them in one huge stack and I tripped... I've heard a similar story a few times, and I don't get it. If I had a large stack of cards, especially one that had to stay

RE: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Harrison
After punching all that data in I was walking to the card reader with them in one huge stack and I tripped... Thus, the origins of the expression: I'm gonna shuffle his deck! Robert B. Harrison Director of Interactive Services Austin Williams 125 Kennedy Drive, Suite 100 Hauppauge NY

Re: Fuseguard processing time

2011-06-13 Thread Russ Michaels
LOL, ok well perhaps I am just used to see much worse loading times on most peoples sites. On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Peter Boughton bought...@gmail.com wrote: 200ms is still a good page load time. Not when the original was 20ms! A page that takes 0.2s to load is no longer instant,

Re: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Larry Lyons
Just to be clear, when folks say UI development, also think jQuery development. I know there are quite a few CF folks doing jQuery work as well. Until you try writing jQuery with DW you don't know what you are missing. Seriously. Or to be clear - JavaScript editing in general is -far- superior in

Re: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Larry Lyons
From what I see, the SVN client version in DW is 1.6.9. Not sure what that means for your SVN servers. To be honest, I ind SVN buddy in Eclipse as well so this wouldn't be a deal breaker for me. While DW does have an SVN integration, I've never been able to get it to work adequately. I either

Re: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Raymond Camden
Interesting - I had no idea about the visual jquery view. However it looks to be -quite- old. Also, CFB's built in jQuery support is also 'stuck' back in 1.3.x with no way to update it. :\ I hate to sound like I'm hating on CFB - I love CFB - but I'm giving up on using it for front end dev and

Re: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Raymond Camden
Hmmm. The Visual jQuery view _loaded_, but doesn't actually do anything. On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Raymond Camden rcam...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting - I had no idea about the visual jquery view. However it looks to be -quite- old. Also, CFB's built in jQuery support is also 'stuck'

Re: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Wil Genovese
I don't have time to play with this now. But it looks like there is a way to manually update the Visual JQuery builder to 1.4.2 - If I understand how CFBuilder was put together, the JQuery view came as part of the Aptana features.

Re: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Larry Lyons
After punching all that data in I was walking to the card reader with them in one huge stack and I tripped... I've heard a similar story a few times, and I don't get it. If I had a large stack of cards, especially one that had to stay ordered, I'd get a piece of string and make a

Re: Fuseguard processing time

2011-06-13 Thread Dominic Watson
Of course, a measure on single hits is not a good measure of the performance impact. You might be happyish adding a 200ms average at peak load to a high traffic site - but who knows what the real impact is without a proper performance test / pushing it live and hoping... Dominic On 13 June 2011

Re: assigning javascript variable to coldfusion.Please assist

2011-06-13 Thread Gunjan Upadhayay
Thanks for all your help. But we need to store the url into a coldfusion variable as at the end of the code,we pass the url to other modules which use this url in other pages. Also, i am not that familiar with how to use Ajax in Dreamweaver. Any help would be highly appreciated.

RE: Fuseguard processing time

2011-06-13 Thread Brook Davies
And my test was done under zero load, so under peak load this number could go up. Hmmm... I don' t know if I should install fuseguard or not in production. Now I am undecided... Brook -Original Message- From: Dominic Watson [mailto:watson.domi...@googlemail.com] Sent: June-13-11

Re: Fuseguard processing time

2011-06-13 Thread Peter Boughton
Well ideally you have a non-development staging server, which closely mimics your live production server, against which you can run load testing to help determine this. The other question is, how secure is your code? If it's riddled with vulnerabilities then it might be safer to take this

Re: Homesite 5.5

2011-06-13 Thread Larry Lyons
Not old just started early. And that cheap university didn't want to update the PDP system for the psych department. That said, you may want to check out Ray Camden's blog. He has a lot of entries on developing for mobile apps. See http://www.coldfusionjedi.com/index.cfm/Mobile Also Ben

Re: Dreamweaver

2011-06-13 Thread Aaron Rouse
It is not that bad. I do work for multiple companies and they provide me machines/software to use at them. One company is using Dreamweaver CS5 and I probably do 60-65% of my total workload there. Another company that I do probably 25% of my workload has Dreamweaver 8 on the workstation that I

Re: Fuseguard processing time

2011-06-13 Thread Sean Corfield
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Brook Davies cft...@logiforms.com wrote: And my test was done under zero load, so under peak load this number could go up. It could also go down. Until you test, you won't know. Under heavy load, the HotSpot compiler in the JVM may work to your benefit and

Re: Dreamweaver

2011-06-13 Thread Sean Corfield
Reading Aaron's response, I suspect it may depend on your platform. I seem to recall the change was more disruptive for Mac users than Windows users (prior to CS5, I believe the Windows and Mac UIs were very different?). Sean On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Aaron Rouse aaron.ro...@gmail.com

Re: Dreamweaver

2011-06-13 Thread Aaron Rouse
True, all of what I am working on is Windows based machines. The UI though is different in CS5 but I never found myself once trying to figure out where something went or how to do something different in it. My guess is in Windows it is nothing to fear, I'd not know for Macs since don't have DW