What is a good total execution time to aim for in Coldfusion? Is there a
standard benchmark?
Thank you.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
sorry should have been this link
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/91025512_cf9_lockdownguide_wp_ue.pdf
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:18 AM, David McGuigan davidmcgui...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Russ.
I'm not sure what you wanted me to see in that link, maybe the fact that
What is a good total execution time to aim for in Coldfusion? Is there a
standard benchmark?
Thank you.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
What is a good total execution time to aim for in Coldfusion? Is there a
standard benchmark?
Thank you.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
That is a depends on question.
A Good execute time is short enough to keep the average (super impatient) web
user from giving up and going somewhere else.
For any website I shoot for under 100ms for a single page load. As traffic
scales up I may allow up to 500ms before thinking it's time
200ms is considered to be slow by CF as default.
I would certainly make 1000ms my absolute maximum and even then there should
be a very good reason a page to even be that slow, such as heavy query that
cannot be avoided or loading content from external sites or something.
Russ
On Tue, Jul 12,
Don't forget that CF execution time is just one part of the entire
package of things that will impact the time it takes for the user to
see the end result. CF can spit everything out in 1ms, but if you have
other issues, then they will still think your site is slow.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at
Depends on the site and application is it data mining? Ecommerce?
Public? Intranet?
A public site designed for marketing and/or sales should target 50 to
150ms. there may be pages that should be considered separately from
your average - like the shopping cart page that sends
0.001 ms
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Mark A. Kruger mkru...@cfwebtools.comwrote:
Depends on the site and application is it data mining? Ecommerce?
Public? Intranet?
A public site designed for marketing and/or sales should target 50 to
150ms. there may be pages that should be
What is a good total execution time to aim for in Coldfusion? Is there
a standard benchmark?
Thank you.
Thanks All. I am converting ASP code to CF 9 and have someone comparing the
page load results to the ASP server and they are supposedly getting faster
times on the ASP server.
I
Well, converting a site from one platform to another may not be very
comparable. At least not until the final product is done and optimized. There
are a lot of factors to execution times including many factors outside of
ColdFusion. Database, OS, JVM Tuning, firewall(s), proxies, IIS/Apache
Well it seems normal for a client to test what is being replaced (ASP)
with what's replacing it (CF) to make sure they aren't heading
backwards.
Perhaps I missed the point of your question? ;-)
Cheers
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:54 -0400, Torrent Girl wrote:
What is a good total execution time
Remember that the first run of a CF page compiles the page to java byte
code. For comparison you should only be testing subsequent loads of the page
(after the compile). It's also useful to explain that compiling process to
the user. :)
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Wil Genovese
Turn on ColdFusion 9's trusted cache. That'll win.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Mark A. Kruger mkru...@cfwebtools.comwrote:
Remember that the first run of a CF page compiles the page to java byte
code. For comparison you should only be testing subsequent loads of the
page
(after the
+ 1
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:47 -0500, Mark A. Kruger wrote:
Remember that the first run of a CF page compiles the page to java byte
code. For comparison you should only be testing subsequent loads of the page
(after the compile). It's also useful to explain that compiling process to
the
also remember that ASP is a native technology on windows/IIS so is
most likely to run quicker, if you were to coompare 2 technologies that run
as an additional tier on top of the OS, such as PHP and CF on windows, then
the results would be a more fair comparison.
Russ
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at
Russ,
I would say ASP might be quicker on say windows 2000 which still supported
native COM but it was never really considered super duper fast... (even
for a windows application) It had fast OLE DB access I suppose. But I always
thought of it as just bolted on to IIS as a must have sort of
I would say it was probably slower in windows 2000, it is a core part of IIS
now.
remember, that cfml has to be compiled into java byte code, processed by
JRUN and then executed by the JRE, so more steps involved and JRUN certainly
uses far more system resources than ASP.
The advantage of CF
I would say it was probably slower in windows 2000, it is a core part of IIS
now.
Well, honestly, that by itself doesn't really make much of a
difference. It's not like the processing time is spent handing
requests from IIS to CF and back, or that running in-process IIS
applications is
If it's a totally dedicated box and we only have 1 developer's code running,
is it still a security risk?
Yes, absolutely.
I tried running it as a limited account and even set full permissions on
every file in the
webroot but still got an immediate IIS 500 error until I flipped it to
Thanks Dave!
I'll try that out tonight.
The ISAPI extensions used by CF... If I used the web connector to tie CF to
IIS do you perchance know where those might be? Just now switching over from
Apache and kind of blind on stuff like this.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Dave Watts
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
remember, that cfml has to be compiled into java byte code, processed by
JRUN and then executed by the JRE, so more steps involved and JRUN certainly
uses far more system resources than ASP.
That's not much different from
The ISAPI extensions used by CF... If I used the web connector to tie CF to
IIS do you perchance know where those might be? Just now switching over from
Apache and kind of blind on stuff like this.
Typically, they're in the CF install directory somewhere, in the
wsconfig folder.
Dave Watts,
That's not much different from what happens with ASP.NET pages. They
start as text, and have to be compiled into bytecode (MSIL, I think
it's called), then executed by the .NET runtime. And JRun using more
system resources shouldn't make a performance difference.
On .NET in an MVC app
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
That's not much different from what happens with ASP.NET pages. They
start as text, and have to be compiled into bytecode (MSIL, I think
it's called), then executed by the .NET runtime. And JRun using more
system
25 matches
Mail list logo
