RE: For consideration...

2009-12-11 Thread Mark Kruger
I like it in principle but what is your idea of ajax based server side validation... Server side validation needs to always be done prior to the server uitlizing the inputs (inserting into the DB etc). You can't validate using an ajax request and THEN submit the form values using a submit

Re: For consideration...

2009-12-11 Thread Kevan Stannard
I haven't tried these but they may be what you are looking for http://www.validatethis.org/ http://www.validatethis.org/http://thor.riaforge.org/ http://thor.riaforge.org/ 2009/12/12 Justin Scott jscott-li...@gravityfree.com I'm tired of writing form input validation routines over and over

RE: For consideration...

2009-12-11 Thread Justin Scott
I like it in principle but what is your idea of ajax based server side validation... Server side validation needs to It would use JavaScript to push the form data to a validation routine on the server before the form is posted to give the user a better experience as a preferred method. If

Re: For consideration...

2009-12-11 Thread James Holmes
The app can do both. The idea is to write one set of server-side validation routines in CF. The app then uses AJAX to check fields as the used fills them out, for the benefit of the user; it also checks them server side on submission to ensure data integrity and prevent circumvention of the

RE: For consideration...

2009-12-11 Thread Justin Scott
I haven't tried these but they may be what you are looking for http://www.validatethis.org/ That looks very promising and similar to what I had in mind. I certainly don't want to reinvent the wheel if this does what it appears to say it does. I'll check it out over the weekend and post back.

RE: For consideration...

2009-12-11 Thread Mark Kruger
[mailto:james.hol...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 5:35 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: For consideration... The app can do both. The idea is to write one set of server-side validation routines in CF. The app then uses AJAX to check fields as the used fills them out, for the benefit

Re: Hardware Consideration

2001-09-17 Thread Michael Lugassy
Mark, I assume the OS would be windows advanced server? Why advanced? Michael. Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 14:11:10 +0200 From: Michael Lugassy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Hardware Consideration Message-ID: 000e01c13ea8$adc3c240$[EMAIL PROTECTED] This may seem a bit OT, but if any pro. can help

RE: Hardware Consideration

2001-09-17 Thread Billy Cravens
Web Development, EDS [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Lugassy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:38 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Hardware Consideration Mark, I assume the OS would be windows advanced server? Why advanced? Michael. Date

Re: Hardware Consideration

2001-09-16 Thread Jeffry Houser
Are you looking for a database Server ( SQL Server? Oracle?) or a ColdFusion server, or a machine that can handle both at once? It is usually recommended that you try to separate your database server from your Application Server. At 02:11 PM 09/16/2001 +0200, you wrote: This may seem a bit

Re: Hardware Consideration

2001-09-16 Thread Michael Lugassy
Jeffry, Are you looking for a database Server ( SQL Server? Oracle?) or a ColdFusion server, or a machine that can handle both at once? It is usually recommended that you try to separate your database server from your Application Server. Something that can handle both at once (SQL and

Re: Hardware Consideration

2001-09-16 Thread Tony Schreiber
I got some good hardware from this guy, but it doesn't look like he's going to be selling any longer: http://www.dark-wave.net/index.html This may seem a bit OT, but if any pro. can help me out here, I'll be glad to hear all tips and pointers. I'm intrested in buying a 1U server to host our

RE: Hardware Consideration

2001-09-16 Thread Eric J Hoffman
It is not a general practice to put CF and SQL on the same box as SQL (as well as CF) can become extremely resource intensive and slow everything down to a halt. If you have the cash, buy two good boxes rather than one expensive box. Eric J Hoffman Director of Internet Development Small Dog

Re: Hardware Consideration

2001-09-16 Thread Jon Hall
Anandtech's IT pages are a great source for midrange server articles. Mostly they talk about their own web server farm, and what they have gone through. He also runs SQL Server and ColdFusion http://www.anandtech.com/it/index.html jon Michael Lugassy wrote: This may seem a bit OT, but if

RE: Hardware Consideration

2001-09-16 Thread Dave Watts
I'm intrested in buying a 1U server to host our full-text/SQL/ coldfusion IIS website. The server mostly run SQL Full-text queries, (10-20 million text rows) Also, there some Coldfusion scripts that consumes some resources for calucluation, generating and querying. Further more, the

Re: Hardware Consideration

2001-09-16 Thread Mark Smeets
Hey Michael, Having put together my own machines and my own server, this much I will say, while I've never used SQL, I am running IIS and CF. The thing is you're dealing with windows so you have to think memory. You need at least 256mb. I think what you should look at is something along the

RE: in consideration of large arrays?

2000-05-23 Thread Sean German
Nevermind :) FOund what I was looking for. Sean -Original Message- From: Sean German [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 8:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: in consideration of large arrays? Howdy fusioneers, I know theoretically the size of an array is