On 28/05/2010 11:38, BarryC wrote:
Did those references you found say anything about the specific version
of windows server 2008, or just in general?
There is 2008 R2 for example, but we are on the standard 2008 - not
sure if there would be any difference there?
The changes came in with straigh
On 28/05/2010 06:59, BarryC wrote:
Yes, that's correct Charlie.
Kym, the NFS is a proper NFS.
and I've been googling and it seems in a lot of contexts NFS on 2008 is
faster than most linux versions. It used to run like a dog and MS
brought a new stack in 2008 that goes like a train. So NFS p
legroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of
> Kym Kovan
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:52 AM
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 9 and Windows server 2008 64bit
>
> On 27/05/2010 13:22, BarryC wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
On 27/05/2010 13:22, BarryC wrote:
Hi,
After some more testing, thread dumps and operating system process
monitoring, we have found that there seems to be a performance issue
with files when accessed via NFS.
The slow part is when file attributes are being requested for a file
on the NFS (this w
Will be interesting to hear the resolution.
I'll note that this was indeed one of the contentions I made in my first reply
on the
thread, when I said that if you had files "on another server or SAN/NAS, that
i/o can
be costly in some configurations (not inherently so, but worth considering)."
Thanks for the update. I don't know the answer to your question, but I'll share
a
thought: you mention that you're load testing stuff. Is that perchance on a
local
development box? If so, is it perhaps some trial or lower-end version of
Win2k8? I
just ask because I know that in past Windows OS's
Hmmso, given that you've now told us that the line 424 that's always
showing up is
doing a filexists(expandpath()), doesn't it seem that this is at the root of the
problem? Have you done some debugging to see what the path is that it's
expanding?
Maybe it's on some drive that's not giving a q
Sure, but to be clear, I was answering Mr B's question in that note rather than
yours.
I'm guessing your note here is a reply to both notes (mine to MrB and the
earlier one
to you, sent about 30 minutes earlier).
To your points below, it's interesting to hear now that you're saying that
using t
/charlie
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
MrBuzzy
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 9:42 AM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 9 and Windows server 2008 64bit
Hi BarryC, I note from your thread dump that you are runni
Well, Barry, this may all be too much to be trying to cover in an email, but
here
goes.
One caution I'll offer is that you do want to be careful just taking "a" thread
dump
and trying to make use of it.
First, you really need to compare two in a row, because it's showing what java
methods
we
Hi BarryC, I note from your thread dump that you are running BOTH
FusionReactor and Adobe ColdFusion Server Monitoring.
As you have the luxury of both, I would advise disabling the CF Monitoring.
It just seems to cause problems.
(Does any one else agree?)
--
You received this message because you
If not a permission issue, an access issue? Are the files in use or being
used another process that is locking the files?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
Barry, I have a few thoughts for you, if it remains unresolved.
First, I notice that your stack trace has this near the top:
java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged
That makes me wonder, and it's just a guess: do you have Sandbox or Resource
Security
enabled in CF? The former is the name in
On 18/05/2010 10:35, BarryC wrote:
I have ensured logging is not on, I'm not 100% sure if it was on or
off, but my subsequent tests are all the same response times.
What do you mean by a file with a funny or two in the middle?
I was looking at this one, and misread it :-)
>>>at
coldfu
It's not a file permission issue is it? They have tripped me up a number
of times on unix/linux servers. I am not sure about Windows but I would
be checking it has read permissions.
On Tue, 18 May 2010 10:11:07 +1000, Kym Kovan
wrote:
On 18/05/2010 09:40, BarryC wrote:
Hi Kym or Kai,
heap into
>> generations etc. I've seen machines with 8 GB RAM and a 6 GB JVM heap and
>> they behaved completely different with the same applications but different
>> inner-generational memory settings.
>>
>> Kai
>>
>>
>>
>>> So wi
On 18/05/2010 09:40, BarryC wrote:
Hi Kym or Kai, or anyone with a successfully working CF9 64bit
install...
What is the JRE version that is actually on the server? the one we are
using is 1.6.0_14
Same here.
Also, some info, the kind of things showing in the thread dumps a lot
are native me
ay 2010 7:11 PM
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 9 and Windows server 2008 64bit
>
> Among others that you might all of a sudden deal with a larger heap,
> different ratios between generations etc.
>
> Cheers
> Kai
>
>
>> Hmm w
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai Koenig [mailto:k...@koeni.de]
> Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 3:57 PM
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 9 and Windows server 2008 64bit
>
> I would not in general blame 64bit CF - seriously. There are
So with that sort of thingis more better? like is a parger heap better
than a smaller heap?
_
From: Kai Koenig [mailto:k...@koeni.de]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 7:11 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 9 and Windows server 2008 64bit
Among others
Among others that you might all of a sudden deal with a larger heap, different
ratios between generations etc.
Cheers
Kai
> Hmm what are these 'requirements' you speak of?
>
> On 17 May 2010 15:57, Kai Koenig wrote:
> I would not in general blame 64bit CF - seriously. There are huge
> insta
Kai Koenig [mailto:k...@koeni.de]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 3:57 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 9 and Windows server 2008 64bit
I would not in general blame 64bit CF - seriously. There are huge
installations out there just running fine on it and I know a f
Hmm what are these 'requirements' you speak of?
On 17 May 2010 15:57, Kai Koenig wrote:
> I would not in general blame 64bit CF - seriously. There are huge
> installations out there just running fine on it and I know a few of them
> really well.
>
> What you will find though with 64bit CF is tha
I would not in general blame 64bit CF - seriously. There are huge installations
out there just running fine on it and I know a few of them really well.
What you will find though with 64bit CF is that is has quite different
requirements for setting up the JVM, assigning memory to it etc.
Cheers
On 17/05/2010 12:41, BarryC wrote:
Hi Kym, your setup sounds rather similar to ours,
What is your version (including updater if any) of CF if you don't
mind me asking?
Sorry should have mentioned that.
CF 9 Enterprise - out of the box. (The latest updater has _not_ been put
on :-) )
--
Yo
We have been running CF9 on Win 2k8 64bit with no issues. Here is once
piece of advice if you are running IIS.
http://blog.kukiel.net/2009/10/coldfusion-9-on-windows-server-2008.html
The 2nd Comment.
/Open
jrun_iis6_wildcard.ini
and uncomment "maxworkerthreads" and set it to a value higher
Well I submitted jvm dumps to adobe support and they came up with nothing
-Original Message-
From: BarryC [mailto:barrychester...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 12:21 PM
To: cfaussie
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 9 and Windows server 2008 64bit
Thanks Steve, we might have a g
To be honest I think it’s the 64bit CF server. I had lots of issues with cf
writing file such as cfmail files and doing heavy db access processes like
loops, issues that I never had with the 32 bit platform. I had some real bad
memory consumption issues also, so bad the cf server was becoming
unre
28 matches
Mail list logo
