Robin Hilliard wrote:
This is a quick message to announce the 2007 National Adobe User
Group meeting on Wednesday 21 February at the Sydney Hilton (WebDU
venue - note non-conference attendees are most welcome to attend),
6:30 for 7:00pm. The speakers include two Adobe visitors from the
Folks,
As part of various promotional efforts we're giving away a bunch of
webDU tickets. If you are hanging out to go but can't afford a ticket
for whatever reason.. you might throw your hat in the ring for one of
these freebies.
webJam (1)
http://www.webjam.com.au/
Lucky door prize is a
I cant work out why I never came across this before but can someone
answer this for me? Apologies for asking an age old question thats
probably been asked a million times.
This tag makes a user use a file based cookie, this means that logging
in to one site in one browser window will result in
Secondly - this has obvious testing advantages - i.e. being able to
log in as 2 different user levels on the same site and flick to make
sure things behave right.
another way of course is to use 2 different browsers: IE for level 1
and FF for level 2.
Confirm is a reserved word. Maybe try another word.
_
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of KNOTT, Brian
Sent: Friday, 23 February 2007 11:25 AM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Firefox Javascript
I'm not actally using confirm. The actual code is confirmForm, I was
just to lazy to type it all out.
Brian Knott
BI Analyst Developer - BI Service Delivery
...
Level 4, SMC
ph. (07) 38355977 (ext 55977)
Scott
As our local Microsoft rep, I was wondering if you could provide a
list of all the online mailing list and discussion forums for .net
developers?
I've got a whole bunch of links for online ColdFusion training modules
and I thought I could post them to all the .Net forums, because I hear
Are they in the same domain? It could be a cross site scripting issue?
Also, I think 'function' needs to be lower case
but thats probably just a
feature of your email program.
_
From: KNOTT, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of KNOTT,
Hmm time to get me some popcorn and settle in for a few hours of
quality entertainment.
On 2/23/07, Darren Tracey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott
As our local Microsoft rep, I was wondering if you could provide a
list of all the online mailing list and discussion forums for .net
You're a funny man Darren ;)
On 2/23/07, Darren Tracey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott
As our local Microsoft rep, I was wondering if you could provide a
list of all the online mailing list and discussion forums for .net
developers?
I've got a whole bunch of links for online ColdFusion
Try using document.forms[yourFormname].confirmForm.value or
document.getElementById(yourFormId).value instead. I am pretty sure
that document.[objectname] is bad joo-joo for many browsers.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Brian,
Have you looke at Firebug? If you haven't change your channel to
www.getfirebug.com and I tell you this, you will wonder how you ever lived
without it.
On 2/23/07, Andrew Bateman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try using document.forms[yourFormname].confirmForm.value or
Scott,
we have a watercooler for that now. And while I walk on over to it, I would
prefer to look at CF stuff on this list and not spam for another competitor.
Oh Scott, I guess you could join us all at the watercooler rather than place
OT shit in here:-)
On 2/23/07, Scott Barnes [EMAIL
Don't you think I shouldn't do that then?
Do you think maybe that wouldn't be the right place to put a whole
bunch of ColdFusion tutorial information?
The first few articles would be CF - .Net comparisons, so surely that
makes it highly relevant to the .Net audience.
Did I suggest doing something
Darren,
What I think and you do is two seperate issues, its your call on what
your reasoning and wants are going forward.
You have a browser, I'm sure you can find your way around
Google/Live.com so whatever blows your hair back go for it. I'll help
you in anyway I can but to be honest, i'm not
Problem was the firefox needs document infrount of the form name so
window.opener.document.form.field.value works
window.opener.form.field.value does not work.
Brian Knott
BI Analyst Developer - BI Service Delivery
...
Level 4, SMC
ph. (07)
Hm, perhaps it's the learn2asp.net and Campaign in the url that
suggested to some people that this was a selling kinda thing...
Yeah, I probably should of put more of a context behind it - ie CF +
.NET interop - was more the point. Chalk that up to a lesson learnt ;)
It is a campaign though,
LOL,
Well I guess you not interested in FB giving you the answer then:-) That's
what firebug is there for, oh well. I'll move on then.
On 2/23/07, KNOTT, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem was the firefox needs document infrount of the form name so
Hey all,
I think there's some fundamental thing I'm missing with building an MVC app in
Fusebox.
I have a fuse in my 'model' that runs a query to get details of an event. Say
the query is named 'qGetEvent'.
When I'm outputing the data for that query, in a 'view' fuse, I'm referring to
Well yeah, typically the View is supposed to - design pattern wise - ask the
controller for that information or in a more perfect world, the controller
tells the view (view abstraction).
Controller is the context to both pieces but in Fusebox and Mach-II you can
get away with mutating the view to
I will give that a go on the weekend.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hehe. I am going to get me some jaffas to throw :-)
On 2/23/07, Mark Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm time to get me some popcorn and settle in for a few hours of
quality entertainment.
On 2/23/07, Darren Tracey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott
As our local Microsoft rep, I
Thanks for the firebug link. I did install it and it looks like a great
add on. Something like this woul dbe greate for IE.
Brian Knott
BI Analyst Developer - BI Service Delivery
...
Level 4, SMC
ph. (07) 38355977 (ext 55977)
Thanks Barry - we thought of this! I am actually most interested the
cf programming side - can you do session only cookies without using
the separate cfcookie tag?
On 2/23/07, Barry Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Secondly - this has obvious testing advantages - i.e. being able to
log in
And after you score a free ticket by stacking the competitions...
(and having been a self-funded attendee before**)
there are tricks to keeping costs down to make the whole process affordable
- transport
_NOW_ is the time to look for the cheap flights, which is really the
only way to do it
any other tips I've forgotten?
Get plenty of sleep and drink lots of water before you come. It can be
a very tiring and dehydrating experience.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
wot, so you can survive being on the turps all night when you're there?
Ahhh... if that sound like the voice of experiance and lessons learnt,
I couldn't possibly say...
On 2/23/07, Mark Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any other tips I've forgotten?
Get plenty of sleep and drink lots
Duncan, I can't think of any security concern to note.
As for your 3rd question, there is indeed a way to do it without this old
trick. It's new as of CFMX 6, and involves the new J2EE sessions feature
that's settable in the Admin console. That means it's for all apps on a
server. It can't be
Welcome to the CFAussie list, Jeff. :-) I don't see you having posted
before, so will presume that you've just joined.
And to add to his note about CF-based Google Custom Search Engines (CSEs),
I'll point out that I had created one right around the same time he did, and
we ended up sharing the
29 matches
Mail list logo
