So just for future reference. What I'm reading is telling me that
really rather than starting off using the default instance, I probably
should have created a new one and done everything in *there*, and left
the default instance as a template for creating future instances. Is
that correct?
I'm
Interesting - the doco suggests datasources are propagated, but my
experience both on my dev and production server was that they are
not. I just copied the neo-datasource.xml across to get them there,
but I'm curious as to why it didn't come across now...
On Apr 21, 3:38 pm, Andrew
Andrew, they absolutely should propagate, so that would be odd. And while
one can copy the neo*.xml files to solve such problems, it's always wise to
be cautious in doing that.
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf
That's interesting Charlie. On my Windows dev machine, my Linux test
environment and my Linux production box I get zero datasources on any
new instances I create. I have CF 9.0.1 on them all.
This is despite my master cfusion instance having over a half a
dozen datasources on all 3 installs.
That is odd, Andrew, and no, I've not heard it happening before (but perhaps
others have).
I will ask this, just to make sure we really are talking about the same
thing: when you create the new instance, do you do it using the WAR file
option (where you provide the name of a WAR file during the
I have just come back to revisit this, and now its working.
I really have done nothing since my last post. Certainly never changed
anything on our two live servers, it seems to have just resolved itself.
Could something have changed on the other side?
I guess I just have to accept that it works
