Some anti - oo here: http://www.geocities.com/tablizer/oopbad.htm
Justin Treher wrote:
I was browsing around some old OO ColdFusion posts and saw a lot of
talk by “Tom MInderson”. It seems like he has about 50 posts spread
out (by doing a quick Google search). They all pretty much say the
Sounds like someone who doesn't get OO and has decided that he must be right
and the rest of the programming world is wrong.
On 8/29/07, Justin Treher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do see his point that trying to map objects to a relational database is
where OOP starts to feel really unnatural. In
] Tom Minderson and anti-OO
Some anti - oo here: http://www.geocities.com/tablizer/oopbad.htm
Justin Treher wrote:
I was browsing around some old OO ColdFusion posts and saw a lot of
talk by Tom MInderson. It seems like he has about 50 posts spread
out (by doing a quick Google search
Just the fact that it is hosted at geocities should give you all the
information you need. ;-)
On 8/29/07, Brian Peddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some anti - oo here: http://www.geocities.com/tablizer/oopbad.htm
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at
I like OO. I don't do full OO models in CF much. Java (where I spend
the most time outside of CF) is a different story - and one where I
have tools such as Hibernate ;). I really just wanted to comment on
this statement:
In addition, with the business
objects we deal with, it seems
PROTECTED] To: cfcdev@cfczone.org Subject: RE: [CFCDEV] Tom
Minderson and anti-OO Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:07:25 -0400 Yeah, I read
a bit of that. I also think Minderson responded to that. He noted that it
was very one sided. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
, I don't have time..Brent
Nicholas - There, I guess King George will be able to read that! - John
Hancock
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cfcdev@cfczone.org Subject: RE: [CFCDEV] Tom
Minderson and anti-OO Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:07:25 -0400 Yeah, I read
a bit of that. I also think Minderson
On 8/29/07, Brent Nicholas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OO's fine if you: have a lot of expertise in it and write applications you
host
Not sure what hosting has to do with it.
OO's fine if you: will need to use common objects (get from db, store in
db, look up customer, get site details)
Smarter minds used to say 540K ought to be enough for everybody, and even
they got away with it.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Brian Kotek wrote:
Sounds like someone who doesn't get OO and has decided that he must be right
and the rest of the programming world is wrong.
On 8/29/07, Justin Treher
?
On 8/29/07, Stijn Dreezen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smarter minds used to say 540K ought to be enough for everybody, and even
they got away with it.
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at
http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm
CFCDev is supported
I think the missing word is memory as in RAM on a motherboard.
Brian Kotek said the following on 8/29/2007 8:05 PM:
?
On 8/29/07, *Stijn Dreezen* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smarter minds used to say 540K ought to be enough for everybody,
and even
they got
First, I think it's significant that these are old posts. Second, I
see this sort of thing alot where people seem to think that there is
only one true answer to a problem and proceed to ferociously defend
that solution as if there were no other possible solution as cool as
the one they are
On 8/29/07, Cameron Childress [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: No hogs were harmed during the writing of this email.
But were any cleaned? I hear they don't much like that. :)
--
If God didn't want smoke in the air, he wouldn't have told us to burn
witches. Stephen Colbert
Now blogging
13 matches
Mail list logo
