[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/22/2007 05:53:19 PM:
Thanx - but I assume you're being sarcastic :-(.
--
Ron Savage
I thought you put forth a very articulate post with solid reasons. Myself,
I like reading about Perl modules because I like expanding my arsenal of
techniques.
I'm enjoying
Todd Ross wrote:
Hi Todd
Thanx - but I assume you're being sarcastic :-(.
I thought you put forth a very articulate post with solid reasons. Myself,
Thanx again.
I like reading about Perl modules because I like expanding my arsenal of
techniques.
Me too.
I'm enjoying following the
Wow, your elegant argument has convinced me that all my issues are
irrelevant and I will switch immediately.
Ben
On Oct 20, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
Ben Hitz wrote:
Hi Ben
I am not a fan of inside-out objects in perl, because I have much
old code which uses old-style hash
* Ricardo SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-19T18:10:17]
I see that the devel version of CGI::Application uses Class::MOP. Neat.
Except it doesn't.
I thought, Hey, I'll just send Mark a patch to remove this. I had an ancient
checkout of CGI::Application, and I did a pull and saw:
Thu Aug
I am not a fan of inside-out objects in perl, because I have much old
code which uses old-style hash objects.
It's confusing to have two types (although technically usable).
We have been converting our hand-rolled Database API to DBIx::Class,
which uses Class::Accessor (actually an
Ben Hitz wrote:
We have been converting our hand-rolled Database API to DBIx::Class,
which uses Class::Accessor (actually an extension written for DBIC)
called Class:Accessor::Grouped and Class:C3 to dispatch.
I am just learning DBIx::Class, also with the intent of using it to
convert from a
Daniel Sterling wrote:
Hi Daniel
But, getting back to the original topic, I agree with Ricardo that,
since the name of the CGI::Application game is simplicity, adding any
class meta-programming to its Perl 5 core doesn't really make sense,
especially when speed and size are affected.
Ben Hitz wrote:
Hi Ben
I am not a fan of inside-out objects in perl, because I have much old
code which uses old-style hash objects.
It's confusing to have two types (although technically usable).
Your use of 'because' there is meaningless.
Before someone adopts inside-out objects, /all/
I see that the devel version of CGI::Application uses Class::MOP. Neat.
Except...
On my 5.8.8 install, loading CGI::Application's stable release adds about 300k
to the resident size of my perl process. Loading metaclass.pm (of Class-MOP)
adds another 2000k.
In other words, moving from
Michael Peters wrote:
Hi Michael
This isn't a hey, Class::MOP is the new hotness! change, is it?
I think this was a hey, Class::MOP is really cool. I bet it would make CGI::App
much simpler...oh wait. Look how slow everything got!. And now we also have
Look how big everything got!.
So,
10 matches
Mail list logo
