9, 2001 02:24
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content
> 0.4 is incompatible with 0.3. Even if there weren't good design decisions
> for doing so (which there are), I still think 0.4 should be incompatible
> with 0.3 just for the sake of starting with a fresh network.
>
&g
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> As an addendum, if 0.4 can speak to an 0.3 node, could people just
> keep up the 0
"David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With freenet 0.3 soon to cease, and freenet 0.4 coming in like a Concorde,
> we urgently need to archive as much of the 0.3 freenet content as possible,
> especially all those loose CHKs and KSKs.
I have a 0.3 node containing about 15,000 items. What
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:30:06PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> [0] Actually there may be more than that; we don't really know. Some of
> the older 0.4 node versions are incompatible with newer 0.4 nodes, so
> there may be some isolated micro-Freenets out there that won't talk to
> anybody else.
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > As an addendum, if 0.4 can speak to an 0.3 node, could people just
> > keep up the 0.3 nodes for queries until they get cached by 0.4?
> Upside down speak you.
>
> Anyway, the 0.
John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> As an addendum, if 0.4 can speak to an 0.3 node, could people just
> keep up the 0.3 nodes for queries until they get cached by 0.4?
> > Why is it that this needs to be done? Why cannot Freenet 0.4 remain
> > compatible with existing content?
Upside do
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As an addendum, if 0.4 can speak to an 0.3 node, could people just
keep up the 0.3 nodes for queries until they get cached by 0.4?
> "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> With freenet 0.3 soon to cease, and freenet 0.4 coming in like a Concorde
"David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With freenet 0.3 soon to cease, and freenet 0.4 coming in like a Concorde,
> we urgently need to archive as much of the 0.3 freenet content as possible,
> especially all those loose CHKs and KSKs.
Why is it that this needs to be done? Why cannot Freen
With freenet 0.3 soon to cease, and freenet 0.4 coming in like a Concorde,
we urgently need to archive as much of the 0.3 freenet content as possible,
especially all those loose CHKs and KSKs.
Don't delay - grab 'em or lose 'em.
Because they ain't gonna be around much longer.
This doesn't apply
