On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Goetz, Paul wrote:
Content for the subprojects was moved to specific folders, e.g.:
opencmis java/opencmis
cmislib python/cmislib
phpclient php/phpclient
dotcmis dotnet/dotcmis
Someone will probably want to set up redirects for those for
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Goetz, Paul wrote:
Tomorrow (Monday, Feb/21) I will clarify with Nick and the infra team,
if we can change this.
I think Florian has / was going to ask infra to send these updates to the
commits list, which is where I believe the original markdown changes go to
too. We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995874#comment-12995874
]
Nick Burch commented on CMIS-307:
-
I've done the initial site structure, and first cut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995929#comment-12995929
]
Nick Burch commented on CMIS-307:
-
The site is available to browse at: http
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Nick Burch wrote:
Voting will be open until the end of Friday, so you've all a little over 72
hours!
The vote has passed the PPMC stage. We had 12 votes in favour, including 2
votes from IPMC members
I'll now take the vote forward to the IPMC, and ask them to approve
(jp...@apache.org)
* Jens Hübel(j...@apache.org)
* Jukka Zitting (ju...@apache.org)
* Martin Hermes (he...@apache.org)
* Nick Burch(n...@apache.org)
* Paolo Mottadelli (pa...@apache.org)
* Paul Goetz(pg...@apache.org)
* Richard
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Nick Burch wrote:
So, voting please:
In case it's not clear, I'm +1 on this (with both IPMC and PPMC hats!)
Nick
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Nick Burch wrote:
The proposed board resolution is below too.
It looks like a couple of people lost the last letter of their username
when I turned the project list of username / name into the board
resolution format of name / email... Corrected block is:
* Bogdan
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Gabriele Columbro wrote:
this contribution to Alfresco [1] which also comprise a potential
contribution to OpenCMIS is triggering to ask me a more general question
on the list.
What is our (and ASF) position with respect to product specific
contributions? Meaning, do you
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Florian Müller wrote:
There was a -1 vote [1]. I guess you have to start over...
Alas yes. If you want, I can give you a hand tomorrow my afternoon / your
morning to fix these problems. Hopefully this'll then be the last time...
Nick
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jeff Potts wrote:
Sorry, Stefane, you are correct, I should have counted your vote. I
guess with the -1 from Stefan Seelmann it is moot. I also agree with you
that looking through the archives is not a great way to count votes.
If you were subscribed to general@incubator
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:39 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jeff Potts wrote:
Sorry, Stefane, you are correct, I should have counted your vote. I
guess with the -1 from Stefan Seelmann it is moot. I also agree with
you that looking through
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Florian Müller wrote:
And I would like to add a related topic:
Confluence will be phased out and Apache CMS will take over [1][2].
Markdown is the mark up language for Apache CMS. Would it make sense to
write our documentation in Markdown then?
If you're interested in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12985459#action_12985459
]
Nick Burch commented on CMIS-298:
-
You might find a few of the responses to the thread
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Jeff Potts wrote:
The vote is still active. Nick, in light of these will you withdraw your
-1 and change to +1?
Alas it needs to be a new vote - votes for the previous artifacts can't be
counted for the new ones. (The vote is against both the state of the
codebase AND
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Jeff Potts wrote:
The cmislib sub-project of Apache Chemistry is ready for its first
release since joining the project.
The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three
+1 Chemistry PMC votes are cast.
Sorry, found one more thing I missed last
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
OK I suggest that for the next iteration of the poll, we let Nick first
give his go ahead before taking the time to vote ourselves.
Alas the first release always takes longer than all subsequent ones :/
I think we should be there now though, when
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Jeff Potts wrote:
The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three
+1 Chemistry PMC votes are cast.
Looks good, +1 from me!
Nick
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Jeff Potts wrote:
You can find the main release candidate artifacts (for distribution at
apache.org/dist) at:
http://people.apache.org/~jpotts/chemistry/cmislib/0.4/dist
I've a concerns about the .egg file:
* It contains the tests, should it?
* It doesn't have the LICENSE
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Florian Müller wrote:
I would like to contribute it to Apache Chemistry and finish it there if
there is enough interest.
I think it's worth adding in. NPandy is another .net incubating project,
and they might have some useful tips on packaging (not to mention the
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Anyone interested in driving the process? Or alternatively, do you think
there's still something the Incubator could teach Chemistry?
I think it would be good to see a release of one of the non-java codebases
too before graduation. I'm not too worried
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Jeff Potts wrote:
I'm overdue with a cmislib release as well. I'm unclear on what the
process is. As a sub-project of Chemistry, do I need to put my release
up for a vote before it is tagged?
The release process should be fairly similar to the one that the java part
went
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Gabriele Columbro wrote:
Please cast your votes!
+1 (ipmc binding)
Nick
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Gabriele Columbro wrote:
One question to conclude: referring to Nick's comments at [4], do you
think we should have anything else in NOTICE for all packages? In other
words, which of the licenses mentioned in the various DEPENDENCIES files
actually require a NOTICE?
The
Hi All
It's about 6 weeks since our last try at a release. I think that most of
the problems flagged up that time have now been resolved? If so, do people
have the spare cycles to push through the last few little bits, and roll
another release?
With the Chemistry talk at ApacheCon happening
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Gabriele Columbro wrote:
this to vote is the first incubator release for Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS,
with the artifacts being versioned as 0.1.0-incubating.
Sorry, but I'm -1 on this. I think you need to fix at least one of the
problems raised in
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I think the key point in http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
is that NOTICE is for *required* third-party notices, so it should be as
small as possible and contain only notices that the owners of
third-party code require.
OK, so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878937#action_12878937
]
Nick Burch commented on CMIS-172:
-
Apache Rat http://incubator.apache.org/rat/ is a great
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Richard McKnight wrote:
I have added a JIRA issue to propose submitting a PHP CMIS Client library to
the Apache project. This client library is being used as part of the Drupal
CMIS module.
mentor hat on
Who's been involved in devloping the code? Is it just yourself, or
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Yes I saw this, and speaking for myself I'm quite interested in
Chemistry being represented at the conference.
Excellent news!
I've never been to an ApacheCon (although I've done a JavaOne talk
before) so I'm not sure what kind of track would be
Did everyone spot this on the incubator general@ list ?
I think Chemistry could probably produce a couple of interesting and well
attended talks. They could fit within a content track (which in Oakland
had things around jcr, sling, couchdb, poi etc). They could fit within an
Incubator new
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Florian Müller wrote:
I've created a Wiki page [1] to plan out the meeting. Please add your
name to the participants list if you plan to come.
I should be able to attend. I'd be planning to act as a mentor not a
coder, so helping ensure things are done according to the
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Florian Müller wrote:
Do you (all participants) want to use the weekend or Monday morning for
travel?
The weekend before is the Apache Retreat in Ireland. It would be good if
one or two of you could make it along to that. It'll be a great chance for
everyone to learn
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Jens Hübel wrote:
Are there any guidelines how Apache projects use these tools and what
belongs where? Are there any plans how the others want to make use of
it?
I know that some projects have an area of their confluence space set to
auto-export to their website. I think
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Klevenz, Stephan wrote:
If you can just point me to existing documentation would be just fine.
Most of the documentation that there is is at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/#committers
Plus there's a little bit on the incubator site, such as:
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, Jukka Zitting wrote:
So, please vote on accepting the OpenCMIS contribution and granting
committer and PPMC member status to the people listed above, on the
condition that the IP clearance passes without problems.
I'm +1
(Looking through the zip of the grant, it seems that
36 matches
Mail list logo
