Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Chicken-users] [SECURITY] Buffer overrun vulnerability in Chicken's scheduler

Hi, On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:40:46 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:33:28PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: Currently a patch is being developed. In the meanwhile an effective workaround is to limit the maximum number of open descriptors using the Unix ulimit -n

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Avoid using / in xsubstring and string-xcopy!, since srfi-13 is compiled with (declare (fixnum))

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:25:11AM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: Hi, The attached patch contains a fix to #869 (https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/869). srfi-13.scm is compiled with (declare (fixnum)), but `xsubstring' and `string-xcopy!' use / in a cond clause as a shorter path to

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Avoid using / in xsubstring and string-xcopy!, since srfi-13 is compiled with (declare (fixnum))

On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:49:49 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:25:11AM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: The attached patch contains a fix to #869 (https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/869). srfi-13.scm is compiled with (declare (fixnum)), but

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add tests for SRFI-13 (adapted from Gauche)

Hi, Attached are some tests for the srfi-13 unit. Best wishes, Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario From 9b090d353e4c3f3c0c60eac39ba1612fde3bce22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:24:19 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Add tests for