Parley, wasn't it?
I, too, worked around this issue on windows using parley.
-Dan
Original Message
On Jul 5, 2020, 13:29, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> I think the problem may also be that your primordial thread is blocking all
> srfi-18 thr
Isn't it possible to pin items, and avoid these relocation and garbage
collection issues, with object-evict?
https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/object-evict
-Dan
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 1:00 PM
your chicken files.
-Dan
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On Aug. 7, 2019, 8:40 a.m., wrote:
> Hey, do you use helm by any chance? Then this might be related:
>
> https://gitlab.com/jaor/geiser/issues/271
>
> Also if you haven't done so already, tr
.release-info[1] file.
0:
https://wiki.call-cc.org/chicken-5-roadmap#the-simplest-approach-just-carry-on
1:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dleslie/allegro-egg/master/allegro.chicken-5.release-info
Thanks,
-Dan
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email
It should be fixed as of this AM.
-Dan
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, November 17, 2018 8:08 AM, Vasilij Schneidermann
wrote:
> > That'd be a missing elisp method; it's used in the version check.
> > What version of emacs a
That'd be a missing elisp method; it's used in the version check.
What version of emacs are you using?
-Dan
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 16, 2018 2:16 PM, David Ireland
wrote:
> Hi,
>
&g
-to-definition and find-references for Scheme projects of most any size.
Happy hacking!
-Dan
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo
recommend using it with Geiser, of course. ;)
Thanks,
-Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
PS, it could take a while for this to reach ELPA et al, so grab the git
source in the interim.
Thanks,
-Dan
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:16:40 -0800
Dan Leslie <d...@ironoxide.ca> wrote:
> Thanks to some quality bug reporting the Geiser support for Chicken
> has been greatly sped up. Ov
ntations, and so you may select
Chicken for the current buffer via geiser-set-scheme. If you're so
inclined, Chicken support can be auto-detected by adding the following
comment to the top of the source file:
;; -*- geiser-scheme-implementation: 'chicken
Have f
Chicken could really use a Language Server Protocol implementation.
Alternatively, making Chicken faster is probably a gold mine of thesis
material.
-Dan
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:20:52 +0100
Daniele <teikf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, I need to make my bachelor thesis in CS and wa
FWIW, I find that the stack traces shown by Chicken’s parser often seem wholly
unrelated to the code at the source of the error. I’m not sure why, either.
-Dan
From: Chicken-users [mailto:chicken-users-bounces+dan=ironoxide...@nongnu.org]
On Behalf Of Claude Marinier
Sent: October 8
You could build something with the posix-shm egg, and the posix unit. If you
need locks, there’s the posix-semaphore egg.
-Dan
From: Chicken-users [mailto:chicken-users-bounces+dan=ironoxide...@nongnu.org]
On Behalf Of Arthur Maciel
Sent: December 28, 2016 7:47 AM
To: Kooda <
Particularly since Chicken is in the minority of Schemes that allow this
behaviour.
I'm not a fan of fast-and-loose binding and typing, personally; it's a
source of too many mistakes.
-Dan
On 2016-09-24 5:14 PM, Derrell Piper wrote:
> I agree that it's allowed but it would an optional warn
4.9.0.1 (stability/4.9.0) (rev 8b3189b)
> windows-mingw32-x86 [ manyargs dload ptables ]
> bootstrapped 2014-06-07
>
> Disabled the Chicken extensions to R5RS syntax
> #;1> (set! foo 1)
> #;2> foo
> 1
Well, damn. It is a bug.
-Dan
On 2016-09-23 6:45 PM, Kon Lovett wrote:
g the set! _expression_ or at top level. The result of the set! _expression_ is unspecified.0: https://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/The%20R5RS%20standard#assignments
I think you should raise this bug in chicken-hackers; it sounds like
it's a platform issue not caught by the automated tests.
-Dan
On 2016-08-23 07:25 PM, Claude Marinier wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Dan Leslie wrote:
>> I have used it successfully with MSys2 and Mingw-w64; th
That should be an org, not a com:http://wiki.call-cc.org/msys2Apologies,-Dan
I have used it successfully with MSys2 and Mingw-w6s; the details are here:http://wiki.call-cc.com/msys2-Dan
Oops, you shouldn't need to install cmake and global. I copy/pasted that
from my Emacs setup readme.
-Dan
On 2016-07-09 5:36 PM, Dan Leslie wrote:
>
> I have just returned from vacation and have access to my Windows 10
> machine again, and so can try out my setup.
>
> Here's w
, and interface with
Chicken through Geiser.
-Dan
On 2016-07-09 4:38 PM, Matt Gushee wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Matt Welland <mattrwell...@gmail.com
> <mailto:mattrwell...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Oh, as an aside, it would be fantastic to have IUP
Ubuntu without the kernel.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: John Cowan
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 9:53 AM
To: Dan Leslie
Cc: Matt Welland; Oleg Kolosov; chicken-users; C K Kashyap
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Installing chicken on windows
Dan Leslie scripsit
It reads to me like Chicken needs an automated builder for the Windows package.
ot less allocation, which in turn means a lot less
> garbage collections need to be performed. So again many thanks to Felix
> for pushing me to make all operators have inlineable C functions!
I am very much looking forward to Chicken 5.
:D
-Dan
signature.asc
De
Word of warning: Babel seems to be hard-coded for Guile only; there are
several open bugs regarding Babel and Geiser regarding, for instance, it
breaking with Chicken.
-Dan
Alex Charlton <alex.n.charl...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi James,
>
> The best thing that I've found for c
Could you perhaps motivate with some sample code?
Thanks,
-Dan
Juergen Lorenz <j...@jugilo.de> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> the bindings egg is now implemented with a functor, so that you can
> replace the default dispatch table, which destructures mixed nested
> li
IIRC, there's been ongoing efforts to remove SRFI-1 from core; which may
explain your observations regarding Master.
Perhaps you should consider asking Chicken Hackers?
-Dan
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016
Perhaps you could motivate regarding which Erlang features you find
desirable?
-Dan
Lawrence Bottorff <borg...@gmail.com> writes:
> . . . where might Chicken be concerning distributed-concurrent programming?
> How close to Erlang's perfect 10 can you get with Chicken. Of course
#;2> (case 'a
(('a) 1)
(('b) 2)
(else #f))
#f
#;3> (case 'a
((a) 1)
((b) 2)
(else #f))
1
#;4>
-Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
ase 'a
('a 1)
('b 2)
(else #f))
1
And just to be thorough:
#;1> (case 'a
(a 1)
(b 2)
(else #f))
Error: (map) during expansion of (case ...) - bad argument type -
not a list: a
-Dan
___
Chicken-users m
If you are desiring a monolithic web stack of the Rails sort, then what
you probably are looking for is GNU Artanis:
http://web-artanis.com/index.html
-Dan
机械唯物主义 : linjunhalida <linjunhal...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi scheme users,
>
> I'm a rails programmer, and knows schem
*raises Egg Nog* And to you as well!
Seasons Greatings to all!
-Dan
felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com writes:
> A very happy christmas to all of you!
>
>
> felix
>
>
> ___
> Chicken-users mailing list
> Chicken-users@nongnu.org
Sly is much higher level than Allegro or SDL; it's probably most
comparable to Doodle or Hypergiant.
-Dan
Josh Barrett <jbarrett...@gmail.com> writes:
> Has anybody tried guile's Sly? If so, how does it stack up to chicken's...
> Variety of libraries?
>
> On Mon, Dec 21
implementation quote
chicken)
2. Or, and this is a superior method if you intend to work with others, you
could declare to Emacs what Scheme the file is for by placing this
comment at the top of the file:
;; -*- geiser-scheme-implementation: 'chicken -*-
Happy Hacking!
-Dan
Lawrence Bottorf
ys install
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
-Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Damn, I should have RTFM. ;)
-Dan
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Peter Bex
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 11:13 AM
To: d...@ironoxide.ca
Cc: chicken-users@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Building on MSYS2
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:48:00AM -0500, d
Isn't there a significant barrier to determining what to strip due to eval,
apply and read?
-Dan
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Peter Bex
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 8:31 AM
To: Victor J
Cc: chicken-users@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] reducing
As a potential user and implementor of similar eggs (Allegro, SOIL, .. nanovg),
I would provide fairly lean bindings first, then do any simplification or
hand-holding as an additional module. It will save you time in the near term
and provide flexibility to the users.
-Dan
Sent from my
Whatever works with the doto macro?
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:47 PM
To: chicken-users
Subject: [Chicken-users] Which API to use (llrb)?
Hi all,
I did some more refinements to the LLRB-code I
It looks to me like a bad type cast. -Dan
of regular expressions, it seems.
Enjoy! And please do keep filing issues.
-Dan
jao <notificati...@github.com> writes:
> Improved features:
>
> - Lots of improvements to Chicken support, by Dan Leslie.
> - Better interoperability with xscheme.
> - Much better perfo
ier. Yes, an API to do
such would be helpful; csi extensions are no longer used in the Chicken
Geiser implementation.
--
-Dan Leslie
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
SBCL is Public Domain/MIT/BSD, depending on the component. GMP is dual
licensed as LGPL3 and GPL2.
The licensing issues would impact those who distribute binaries built
with SBCL, but only if they are statically linked to GMP.
-Dan
Stephen Eilert spedr...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jun 25
would be appreciated. :D
Thanks!
--
-Dan Leslie
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
And thanks to your feedback the branch is now passing the available
tests.
Turns out that (syntax) was allowing the two-modules-in-one-file thing
to work. Taking that out caused... Problems. ;)
--
-Dan Leslie
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken
of a fair number of
domain-specific languages, I think.
Anyhow, without further ado, you can find the example here:
https://github.com/dleslie/funky
PS, can anyone explain the comment here:
https://github.com/dleslie/funky/blob/master/funky.scm#L24
Thanks!
-Dan Leslie
Hi Jeremy,
I'd be happy to make Emacs + Geiser work better on Windows.
It would be a great first step if you could file a bug on the Geiser
GitHub page that reports the issue in detail. From there you can track
the progress as I whittle away at it.
-Dan
Jeremy Steward jer...@thatgeoguy.ca
Peter Bex pe...@more-magic.net writes:
I have a solution in the works for the particular problem of slow
numbers. This is in a CHICKEN 5 branch I've been working on, which
I will announce in a week or so.
Colour me excited. :)
-Dan
--
-Dan Leslie
much Scheme/Lisp any more. I
wish that this wasn't the case; you've done such great work.
-Dan
--
-Dan Leslie
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
was spending its time on and it
appeared that it becomes mired in a tar pit of garbage collection
tagging. Can someone else with a little more understanding shed some
light on this?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.lang.scheme/x1YafU5t0B0/M0mzhrl7LxYJ
Thanks!
--
-Dan Leslie
I'd stick with zmq, particularly considering that you've already begun
updating the egg. It also looks like it has a greater amount of
community and developer support.
-Dan
Matt Gushee m...@gushee.net writes:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Dan Leslie d...@ironoxide.ca wrote:
You might
You might want to consider the nanomsg egg, which doesn't appear to have
a wiki page yet.
https://github.com/Adellica/chicken-nanomsg
-Dan
Matt Gushee m...@gushee.net writes:
Hello, folks--
I am developing a distributed application for which I would like to use
ZeroMQ. I've discovered
Is that a function composition function I spy?
I wasn't aware of such a thing in R5RS or R7RS, is it a chicken
extension or a part of one of the Unity libraries?
Thanks!
-Dan
Peter Bex pe...@more-magic.net writes:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:51:26AM -0700, Alexej Magura wrote:
Does Chicken
Honestly, I just feed the output of chicken-status into chicken-install
-reinstall
-Dan
On 14-12-16 11:44 PM, Alexej Magura wrote:
Is there a way to update eggs? I thought it might be chicken-install
-update-dbbut that seems to have a different effect. Is there no
zero-config means
I can imagine that this is something that might be present on more than
a few corporate networks.
Perhaps it's best to simply rename the cock egg?
-Dan
On 14-12-15 03:01 PM, Alex Shinn wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Bahman Movaqar bah...@bahmanm.com
mailto:bah...@bahmanm.com wrote
*facepalm*
Yes, my way is the way not to do it; thanks to my reading comprehension
failure. ;)
-Dan
On 14-12-13 06:44 PM, John Cowan wrote:
Bahman Movaqar scripsit:
What is the idiomatic way of replacing the nth element in a list
*without* mutating the list? Is the combination of take
that you have chicken-doc installed and configured.
At present, I am working on Geiser integration for Chicken Scheme that,
once completed, will be far superior to what is presently available for
Chicken on newer Emacs. Keep an eye on this list; once it's done I'll
send an announcement.
-Dan
On 14
Not part of the standard distribution; however, the apropos egg will
allow you to locate defined symbols by regex; you could simply provide a
regex that matches all strings.
-Dan
On 14-12-05 07:48 PM, Joe Python wrote:
I can check whether an individual procedure is available by just
typing
A short update: I've made fairly good progress in the last few days. I
would say about 3/4 of the features are complete.
A special thanks to the authors of the Apropos and Chicken-Doc eggs!
-Dan
On 14-11-21 03:48 PM, Daniel Leslie wrote:
As a follow-up to my earlier inquiries regarding
*facepalm*
I should have read to the bottom of the help listing for csc.
Thanks Peter!
-Dan
On 14-04-06 09:13 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 08:55:31AM -0700, Daniel Leslie wrote:
I'm trying to create a 'portable' distribution of chicken and am running
into a simple issue
of a
library and so it fails. Disabling the banner appears to solve this issue.
I wonder if doing a STATICBUILD would rectify this?
-Dan
On 14-04-06 09:31 AM, Dan Leslie wrote:
*facepalm*
I should have read to the bottom of the help listing for csc.
Thanks Peter!
-Dan
On 14-04-06 09:13 AM
Nix that, STATICBUILD would break most everything I need.
Hrm, haven't a clue.
-Dan
On 14-04-06 10:09 AM, Dan Leslie wrote:
Actually, that doesn't appear to help.
In order to get csi to work I must pass both the -include-path
parameter as well as -q; and csc has no equivalent option to -q
Analyze and syntax-check only csc invocations appear to work (-A and -P
options). That implies to me that -include-path is adhered to /very/
late in the invocation, if at all.
-Dan
On 14-04-06 10:18 AM, Dan Leslie wrote:
Nix that, STATICBUILD would break most everything I need.
Hrm
, building from the same directory as the source resolved all of
the issues.
Here's hoping Oleg's cmake branch comes together soon. :)
-Dan
On 14-04-06 08:55 AM, Daniel Leslie wrote:
I'm trying to create a 'portable' distribution of chicken and am
running into a simple issue. Basically, the built
On 12/5/2013 5:50 PM, Dan Wilckens wrote:
On 12/4/2013 7:01 PM, Dan Wilckens wrote:
Hi,
I built Chicken 4.8.0.5 from source on the mingw-msys platform (under
windows vista). After attempting to port and debug a program I wrote
originally for Gambit scheme it seems that I've run into an issue
On 12/4/2013 7:01 PM, Dan Wilckens wrote:
Hi,
I built Chicken 4.8.0.5 from source on the mingw-msys platform (under
windows vista). After attempting to port and debug a program I wrote
originally for Gambit scheme it seems that I've run into an issue with
the read-line command
-installed sfri-34. I think the other two extensions I use
(sfri-69 and irregex) were already installed. Thanks for any help you
can provide!
Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken
and passing it to
another, for instance.
I've tried doing such things with multiple processes using a mix of
shared memory objects and pipes, but it was ludicrously cumbersome,
despite a few eggs I wrote to alleviate the process.
-Dan
___
Chicken
Chibi grant you?
-Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Regarding:
http://wiki.call-cc.org/embedding
Is it possible to embed chicken in such a way that there exists multiple
concurrent top levels that do not directly interact unless objects are
specifically passed by the programmer?
-Dan
___
Chicken
functions to be mutated.
-Dan
On 6/27/2013 10:07 AM, Claude Marinier wrote:
Hi,
A function in pcap-interface.c calls Chicken Scheme. It builds a
vector containing a bunch of things, e.g. C_fix(ethtype), and the
source and destination addresses as vectors. The scheme code converts
the address
By using parameters; see also:
http://api.call-cc.org/doc/chicken/parameters/make-parameter
http://api.call-cc.org/doc/miscmacros/define-parameter
http://api.call-cc.org/doc/chicken/special-forms/parameterize
-Dan
On 6/26/2013 2:47 PM, Daniel Ajoy wrote:
add binds a to 1 at the moment
Oh you just had to be different. ;)
The related SRFI is withdrawn, is it safe to assume that fluid-let will
be available outside of Chicken?
-Dan
On 6/26/2013 2:56 PM, Kon Lovett wrote:
See http://api.call-cc.org/doc/chicken/special-forms#def:fluid-let
#;1 (define a 1)
#;2 (define (add x
Probably the simplest solution would be to treat it as fixed size and
use the maximum possible size for the object.
From http://linux.die.net/man/7/inotify
Specifying a buffer of size
sizeof(struct inotify_event) + NAME_MAX + 1
will be sufficient to read at least one event.
-Dan
Hmm, now I want to work with SPOCK a bit more.
-Dan
On 6/19/2013 7:38 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
On Thu, 02 May 2013 13:57:58 + Mario Domenech Goulart
mario.goul...@gmail.com wrote:
An interview with Felix Winkelmann, the author of CHICKEN:
http://spin.atomicobject.com/2013/05/02
was constructing inside of a foreign-safe-lambda call were sitting at
top-level in application instances that were running for quite an
extended time, and themselves were frequently referenced. (IE, a
foreign-safe-lambda constructed Color would be referenced as the
clear-color repeatedly).
-Dan
Feel free to ask questions in the IRC channel, #chicken on irc.freenode.net
-Dan
On 6/5/2013 7:07 AM, nehal singhal wrote:
Hi,
I am a newbie to chicken.Can i get some aid as to how to start
coding through chicken. I was recently learning racket and also have
know-how of Python-2.6
macro
to patch it all together.
-Dan
On 6/5/2013 8:10 AM, pluijzer . wrote:
Hello everybody,
I was planning to use Chicken Scheme in a fashion more similar to
Guile and Lua. i.e. passing Scheme Data Objects from Chicken to C and
back using the C interface.
I am a little confused though
Oh dear!
Well, it works and I haven't had problems. What's the correct way to go
about this?
-Dan
On 6/5/2013 2:36 PM, Felix wrote:
From: Dan Leslie d...@ironoxide.ca
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken C interface
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:47:45 -0700
I do this a fair bit in the Allegro
Thanks, I'll get on updating my broken eggs soon.
obvious humpty dumpty joke notwithstanding
-Dan
On 6/5/2013 2:39 PM, Felix wrote:
From: pluijzer . pluij...@gmail.com
Subject: [Chicken-users] Chicken C interface
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 17:10:41 +0200
Hello everybody,
I was planning to use
at process
forking. posix, posix-shm, posix-semaphore and lolevel's object-evict
(or the new protobuf) should be helpful in this regard.
-Dan
On 13-06-04 07:15 PM, Bryan Vicknair wrote:
SRFI-18 states:
Read and write operations on the store (such as reading and writing a
variable
This is very welcome!
I wonder if this would be useful for storing data in a posix shared
memory block...
-Dan
On 5/28/2013 3:15 PM, Thomas Chust wrote:
Hello,
during the CHICKEN spring thing in Cologne I started to work on a new
egg [1] implementing the protocol buffer [2] serialization
Huh, now that is useful!
https://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Unit%20lolevel#object-evict
Still, if I ever have call to use pshm for ipc between chicken and
not-chicken workers then this egg would probably be useful.
Thanks again,
-Dan
On 5/28/2013 5:24 PM, Thomas Chust wrote:
On 2013-05-29 00:32
I tried to install sdl egg (same thing with sdl-base) and it's setup script
calls sdl-config just as sdl-config --some-arg. sdl-config is bash script, so
means on windows we can't just call it. Is better to check for bash presence
and use command like bash sdl-config --some-args.
P.S. still
Egg named bb (GUI toolkit) uses getenv in setup script, but documentation
says: getenv was removed in Chicken 4.6.4. Use get-environment-variable
instead.. I founded this when i tried to install bb. Log:
B:\home\chicken-install bb
retrieving ...
connecting to host
http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/soil
http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/physicsfs
Disclaimer: I am the author of the soil, allegro and physicsfs eggs.
Patches are welcome!
-Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https
!
-Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
/2007/05/24/semaphores-in-linux.html?page=5
-Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
this would be a good opportunity to get used to Git
via a GitHub project? ;)
Thanks,
-Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
-cc.org/man/4/Unit%20srfi-4
Keep in mind that foreign-lambdas will take blob and srfi-4 vectors as
parameter types and convert them to their relevant C types without
undertaking a copy.
https://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Accessing%20external%20objects
-Dan
On 5/3/2013 11:04 AM, Pedro Melendez wrote
I was just poking through posix, posix-shm, posix-utils, and
posix-extras and it seems that none of them implement semaphores!
Am I missing something, or is this actually the case?
-Dan
On 5/3/2013 3:26 PM, Ivan Raikov wrote:
Hello,
I really strongly advise _against_ using SRFI-4 vectors
around a bit but haven't had much time to progress
very far.
I'm hesitant to take responsibility for writing a semaphore egg, but
what the hell. I'll start something on GitHub this weekend.
-Dan
On 5/3/2013 4:22 PM, Ivan Raikov wrote:
Are you talking about POSIX semaphores, sem_wait(3
Wild!
I've looked at binding GLM a few times but shied away from the wall of
templates. Your solution is a rather elegant hack, IMHO, leaving little
to the clients of your bindings to fuss about.
What's the license?
-Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing
the documentation.
Thanks!
-Dan
On 4/15/2013 3:41 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
Hi,
It is now possible to break up egg documentation into several pages. This was
previously possible on the wiki, but is now supported by chicken-doc as well.
Procedure: instead of creating a file, create a directory
://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Unit%20lolevel
-Dan
On 3/4/2013 3:04 PM, Bruno Arruda wrote:
Hi,
I was looking for a reference documentation of native procedures in
Scheme, but I found nothing.
Please, where can I find this?
Thanks!
___
Chicken-users mailing
.
That would be incredibly handy.
-Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Of course it would, and the Perl substitute command would be more general
still. For that matter, you could allow an arbitrary Scheme procedure to
be provided. But drop-prefix is dead simple, has precedent, and is
easy to understand and use.
Why not have both?
-Dan
and the contribution! And welcome to
Chicken-land, come join us on IRC if you get a chance.
Thanks,
-Dan
On 2/20/2013 9:36 AM, Nicholas Van Horn wrote:
I'm new to Chicken (and scheme for that matter), but I'm eager to
contribute. I've been working on several text processing projects for
which
, but there are
quite a few varibles.
Dan
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:17 PM, John Cowan co...@ccil.org wrote:
Stephen Eilert scripsit:
So far, I am using a combination of modules and includes.
IMHO, units are effectively obsolete unless you are dealing with such
large volumes of code that Chicken/gcc can't
rewriting as an option.)
Dan
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:19 PM, John Cowan co...@ccil.org wrote:
Dan Liebgold scripsit:
I probably have something obvious wrong, but after installing the
syntax-case egg in Chicken 4.2.0 I can't require it, and I can't make
sense of the error:
Chicken 4.x doesn't
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
