On Friday 11 September 2009 04:39:43 pm you wrote:
2009/9/10 Matthew Welland m...@kiatoa.com
Seconded. I gave some code of mine to someone with instructions to
install chicken to compile it. He said it doesn't work. Oops. Yeah, You
gotta use 3.3. Ok, how do I get it. Uh, dunno. He now
Replying to myself - I just needed to use require instead of use.
I'll test a few other apps and if it goes well start moving to 4.1.
On Saturday 12 September 2009 09:52:51 am Matthew Welland wrote:
On Friday 11 September 2009 04:39:43 pm you wrote:
2009/9/10 Matthew Welland m...@kiatoa.com
require works but probably require-library in chicken 4 is the nearest
equivalent to use in chicken 3. In chicken 4, use now does
require-library + import, and the import is causing the problem.
As far as modules, as a quick fix you can probably just wrap your
geolib source file (etc.) in
Jim Ursetto scripsit:
As far as modules, as a quick fix you can probably just wrap your
geolib source file (etc.) in (module geolib * (import scheme chicken)
...), so USE will operate as it did in Chicken 3.
Actually, you can't. In Chicken 3, use would load stuff from the
current directory,
On Saturday 12 September 2009 02:13:47 pm you wrote:
require works but probably require-library in chicken 4 is the nearest
equivalent to use in chicken 3. In chicken 4, use now does
require-library + import, and the import is causing the problem.
As far as modules, as a quick fix you can
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Matthew Welland m...@kiatoa.com wrote:
On Saturday 12 September 2009 02:13:47 pm you wrote:
require works but probably require-library in chicken 4 is the nearest
equivalent to use in chicken 3. In chicken 4, use now does
require-library + import, and the
Jim Ursetto scripsit:
Version 4.1.1 - SVN rev. 15417
#;1 (use a)
; loading ./a.import.so ...
; loading /Users/jim/local/chicken-4/lib/chicken/4/scheme.import.so ...
; loading /Users/jim/local/chicken-4/lib/chicken/4/chicken.import.so ...
; loading ./a.so ...
But if you haven't compiled it
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 6:50 PM, John Cowan co...@ccil.org wrote:
But if you haven't compiled it and just have the source, that doesn't work;
it used to in Chicken 3's csi.
$ rm a.import.so
$ rm a.so
$ csi
Version 4.1.1 - SVN rev. 15417
#;1 (use a)
; loading ./a.import.scm ...
; loading
Jim Ursetto scripsit:
$ csi
Version 4.1.1 - SVN rev. 15417
#;1 (use a)
; loading ./a.import.scm ...
; loading /Users/jim/local/chicken-4/lib/chicken/4/scheme.import.so ...
; loading /Users/jim/local/chicken-4/lib/chicken/4/chicken.import.so ...
; loading ./a.scm ...
#;2
Okay, then, it
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:14 PM, John Cowan co...@ccil.org wrote:
Okay, then, it seems you at least have to do csc -J.
That is true, which is why I mentioned it in the next sentence.
Jim
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
2009/9/10 Matthew Welland m...@kiatoa.com
Seconded. I gave some code of mine to someone with instructions to install
chicken to compile it. He said it doesn't work. Oops. Yeah, You gotta use
3.3. Ok, how do I get it. Uh, dunno. He now thinks chicken is a POS. My
fault for not testing my
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:14:50PM -0700, Derrell Piper wrote:
Someone asked me what I meant by my first comment. I checked
Salmonella and it reports the following statistics for eggs (4 on top,
3 on bottom):
Failed99
Succeed 334 (76%)
Skipped 4
Total
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 03:14:50 pm Derrell Piper wrote:
Someone asked me what I meant by my first comment. I checked
Salmonella and it reports the following statistics for eggs (4 on top,
3 on bottom):
Failed99
Succeed 334 (76%)
Skipped 4
Total 437
Hi Folks,
These are planned changes to the unit structure of Chicken 4:
1) Unit utils 'read-all' - Unit extras.
2) Unit utils 'qs', 'system*', 'compile-file-options', 'compile-
file' - Unit files.
3) Unit extras random stuff - Unit utils
4) Unit files pathname stuff - Unit pathname
5)
Hi Kon
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:51:35 -0700 Kon Lovett klov...@pacbell.net wrote:
2) Unit utils 'qs', 'system*', 'compile-file-options', 'compile-
file' - Unit files.
I suggest renaming `qs' to something more meaningful.
Best wishes.
Mario
___
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:51:35AM -0700, Kon Lovett wrote:
Hi Folks,
These are planned changes to the unit structure of Chicken 4:
1) Unit utils 'read-all' - Unit extras.
2) Unit utils 'qs', 'system*', 'compile-file-options', 'compile-
file' - Unit files.
3) Unit extras random
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:59:17PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
Hi Kon
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:51:35 -0700 Kon Lovett klov...@pacbell.net wrote:
2) Unit utils 'qs', 'system*', 'compile-file-options', 'compile-
file' - Unit files.
I suggest renaming `qs' to something more
Kon Lovett scripsit:
2) Unit utils 'qs', 'system*', 'compile-file-options', 'compile-
file' - Unit files.
These last two don't seem to be on the wiki anywhere.
I agree that qs is a crappy name; it should be shell-quote or
quote-for-shell.
I want to perform 1 - 3 soon, and 4 - 6 after.
On Sep 9, 2009, at 11:12 AM, John Cowan wrote:
Kon Lovett scripsit:
2) Unit utils 'qs', 'system*', 'compile-file-options', 'compile-
file' - Unit files.
These last two don't seem to be on the wiki anywhere.
I know. TBD.
I agree that qs is a crappy name; it should be shell-quote or
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Peter Bex wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:51:35AM -0700, Kon Lovett wrote:
Hi Folks,
These are planned changes to the unit structure of Chicken 4:
1) Unit utils 'read-all' - Unit extras.
2) Unit utils 'qs', 'system*', 'compile-file-options', 'compile-
file' - Unit
Seems like you already have a substantial broken egg problem with
Chicken 4 already. You sure you want to break yet more eggs? Do you
have the ability to fix all the eggs? If so I think you should
consider that as part of this re-org. I also dislike 'Utils'; that's
awfully generic.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Kon Lovett wrote:
How can we ensure eggs keep working on systems with
Chicken 4.1 and Chicken 4.2 (assuming these will be made into 4.2)?
We can only distinguish between major versions of Chicken in
chicken-setup and other egg tools.
The setup-api
I trust you will make any changes backwards-compatible and transparent
for a while so we have a semblance of stability.
Unless you are also proposing that you will modify every affected egg
and add a cond-expand to distinguish between Chicken 4.1 and 4.2.
I'll accept breakage if it gets me cool
Someone asked me what I meant by my first comment. I checked
Salmonella and it reports the following statistics for eggs (4 on top,
3 on bottom):
Failed 99
Succeed 334 (76%)
Skipped 4
Total 437
Failed 65
Succeed 139 (67%)
Skipped 4
Total 208
...which seems to
Hi Kon,
Good idea in principle. Unit extras and utils should be dissolved
altogether, if possible. Can I ask you to wait until Chicken 4.2.0 is
released? I will merge trunk into the prerelease branch this weekend,
and start testing it, so if you can start making your changes to trunk
after
25 matches
Mail list logo
