Hi,
I just updated the chicken installer to version 4.8.0.1. You can get it at
https://bitbucket.org/roti/chicken-installer/downloads.
Enjoy,
Răzvan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
Mulțumesc! It's very nice to have an easy-to-use installer for Windows.
Hi,
I just updated the chicken installer to version 4.8.0.1. You can get it at
https://bitbucket.org/roti/chicken-installer/downloads.
Enjoy,
Răzvan
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Kushnariov
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Dan Leslie d...@ironoxide.ca wrote:
Nice work, contributions are greatly appreciated. :)
Since you're asking for constructive feedback, two things come to mind:
It's a matter of taste, but IMHO it's schemier that *descriptive-variable*is
preferable to
Hi people,
some questions regarding egg docs:
1) I understand that the egg doc should be added to the wiki, but I
suppose that it should respect a particular format to be compatible
with chickadee, I'm right? where I can found it?
2) Is there any tools for this? I found the cock egg, but I
Hi Hugo,
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:52:24 -0300 Hugo Arregui hugo.arre...@gmail.com wrote:
some questions regarding egg docs:
1) I understand that the egg doc should be added to the wiki, but I
suppose that it should respect a particular format to be compatible
with chickadee, I'm right? where
On Feb 20 2013, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
join-strings, and string-match or match-string. Another is to
keep the s- prefix, which is a natural grouping. Or you could
require the user to prefix on import, but if that's always needed due
to conflicts, why make them go through the extra
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
I've been in this situation often enough. My boiler-plate solution
is to create yet another module which imports all of the prefixed
(in this case this would be the s- prefixed stuff), bind them
to the names sans prefix and export again. Then ipon import
I've proposed a new type of import specifier to go with prefix,
namely drop-prefix. Rather than prefixing all names, this removes
the prefix from any names that have it. This would be a Good Thing to
add to Chicken; Chibi already has it, and it is part of a proposal for
R7RS-large.
That
On Feb 21, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
On Feb 20 2013, Mario Domenech Goulart [well, actually, I, Jim] wrote:
join-strings, and string-match or match-string. Another is to
keep the s- prefix, which is a natural grouping. Or you could
require the user to prefix on import,
On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:04 PM, John Cowan wrote:
I've proposed a new type of import specifier to go with prefix, namely
drop-prefix. Rather than prefixing all names, this removes the prefix
from any names that have it. This would be a Good Thing to add to Chicken;
Chibi already has it, and it
On Feb 21 2013, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
On 21 Feb 2013 20:50:16 +0100 Jörg F. Wittenberger
joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net wrote:
On Feb 20 2013, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
join-strings, and string-match or match-string. Another is to
keep the s- prefix, which is a natural
Jim Ursetto scripsit:
I've proposed a new type of import specifier to go with prefix, namely
drop-prefix. Rather than prefixing all names, this removes the prefix
from any names that have it. This would be a Good Thing to add to Chicken;
Chibi already has it, and it is part of a
Dan Leslie scripsit:
Of course it would, and the Perl substitute command would be more general
still. For that matter, you could allow an arbitrary Scheme procedure to
be provided. But drop-prefix is dead simple, has precedent, and is
easy to understand and use.
Why not have both?
Okay,
Of course it would, and the Perl substitute command would be more general
still. For that matter, you could allow an arbitrary Scheme procedure to
be provided. But drop-prefix is dead simple, has precedent, and is
easy to understand and use.
Why not have both?
-Dan
Somehow I can't verify that my type declarations are actually
effective.
So far I noticed that when I make usage-error wrt. types I
- within a single file that is -
get an error in tje compilation step.. Which is what I like.
Now that I've got a .types file for each module, I tried to
enforce
On 2/21/13 9:55 AM, Nicholas Van Horn wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Dan Leslie d...@ironoxide.ca
mailto:d...@ironoxide.ca wrote:
I'm not certain what you intended by 'official', but if you meant
that you'd like to see it packaged with Chicken then perhaps you
should
Thanks Mario, Dan. Very useful information as usual!.
Regards,
Hugo
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
17 matches
Mail list logo
