find attached some code of mine using openssl for that hashes and hmacs
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 09:12 +0100 schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 07:17:23PM -0500, Thomas Hintz wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone used Amazon S3 with Chicken? I can't seem to find any libs built
for
find attached some code of mine using openssl for that hashes and hmacs
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 09:12 +0100 schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 07:17:23PM -0500, Thomas Hintz wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone used Amazon S3 with Chicken? I can't seem to find any libs built
for
Am Mittwoch, den 29.12.2010, 17:57 -0500 schrieb Joe Python:
Jorg,
When I ran this I got
Error: unbound variable: ##process#io-ports
Sorry. A weird twist in my compile time environment.
Must be process-io-ports.
___
Chicken-users
Maybe this is better for you?
Use like this:
(process-call (lambda () 7)) = 7
/Jörg
(declare
(disable-interrupts)
(foreign-declare #EOF
#include errno.h
EOF
)
)
(define process-io-ports
(let ([make-input-port make-input-port]
[make-output-port make-output-port]
Just got a few minutes off and was thinking: maybe you are a less
experienced Schemer asking for a parallel map executed by subprocesses.
Am Mittwoch, den 29.12.2010, 11:56 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Maybe this is better for you?
Use like this:
(process-call (lambda () 7)) = 7
pthreads
;; (C) 2008, 2010 Jörg F. Wittenberger -*-Scheme-*-
(declare
(unit sqlite3)
(uses srfi-1 srfi-18 srfi-69 atomic pthreads)
(fixnum)
(usual-integrations)
(disable-interrupts)
(foreign-declare #EOF
typedef C_word obj;
#define FALSE_OBJ C_SCHEME_FALSE
#include sqlite/sqlite3.h
#include
Am Sonntag, den 05.12.2010, 16:15 -0700 schrieb Alan Post:
Should `equal?' descend into procedures, or just do an `eq?' test?
R5RS only requires a structural equivalence test for pairs and
vectors, but being able to contain (say) records is something that's
too handy not to have.
Would the
Am Montag, den 06.12.2010, 08:51 -0700 schrieb Alan Post:
R5RS section 6.1 has this example:
(equal? (lambda (x) x)
(lambda (y) y)) === unspecified
Thanks!!
Just got a ticket to be fixed here. :-/
___
Chicken-users mailing
Am Montag, den 06.12.2010, 08:46 -0700 schrieb Alan Post:
I selected equal? in this case because the *lists* aren't going to
be pointer-equal, just their contents, and the contents fall into
two distinct classes, procedures and strings, and the strings won't
be eq? for the same reason the
Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 13:36 -0700 schrieb Alan Post:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:03:15PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 12:57 -0500 schrieb Hans Nowak:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:33, David Steiner davidsteiner2...@gmail.com
wrote:
i'm reading SICP
Am Samstag, den 04.12.2010, 14:56 +0100 schrieb Felix:
(define (cons x y)
(define (dispatch m)
(cond ((= m 0) x)
((= m 1) y)
(else (error Argument not 0 or 1 -- CONS m
dispatch)
...
Error happens here in csi already.
... depending on how `caar' was
Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 12:57 -0500 schrieb Hans Nowak:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:33, David Steiner davidsteiner2...@gmail.com
wrote:
i'm reading SICP and practicing in chicken. in the book they redefine
cons, car and cdr using procedures:
(define (cons x y)
(define (dispatch m)
Yes, I'll do that. I could also least remove the warning for the
(common) case of a conditional performing a self-tailcall.
Do you mean that this pattern
(let ((x ...))
(let loop (...)
(if ...
(loop ...
in tail position of a procedure would still return
Am Montag, den 29.11.2010, 13:53 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Hi Hugo,
Am Sonntag, den 28.11.2010, 17:27 +0100 schrieb Peter Bex:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:53:53PM -0300, Hugo Arregui wrote:
Hi guys,
(define (make-memoized proc)
(let ((memo (make-hash-table))
(missing
Am Montag, den 29.11.2010, 10:34 -0300 schrieb Stephen Eilert:
So it is not only memoization, but a caching system. I was going to
write something similar, to cache webservice responses.
That it is.
I've got several caches working with the attached code.
The API is kind of patterned after
Am Freitag, den 26.11.2010, 11:03 -0500 schrieb Felix:
The style warning I'd like to avoid if all possible.
Me too.
I'd rather vote for changing the syntax definitions (one-by-one, tell me
the git/svn/wtf reference and I'll try my best).
Don't bother with it. There are quite a
Am Mittwoch, den 24.11.2010, 19:25 +0100 schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:15:24PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
I didn't know SQLite had any replication whatsoever at all. Or did you
roll your own?
Well, I told you with a grin that this is a letters to the editor. So
Am Mittwoch, den 24.11.2010, 18:53 +0100 schrieb Felix:
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:08:46 +0100
Have a compiler switch (since it may break some code), which changes the
code
Am Donnerstag, den 25.11.2010, 22:34 +0100 schrieb Felix:
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:24:01 +0100
Am Mittwoch, den 24.11.2010, 18:53 +0100 schrieb Felix:
From: Jörg F
Am Mittwoch, den 24.11.2010, 08:37 -0700 schrieb Alan Post:
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
I'll paste an example from my code, because an example is sometime
better than a lyrics.
If you where to keep the byte offset (called start in the code down
there) with your position objects,
Am Mittwoch, den 24.11.2010, 08:37 -0700 schrieb Alan Post:
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
I'll paste an example from my code, because an example is sometime
better than a lyrics.
If you where to keep the byte offset (called start in the code down
there) with your position
Am Dienstag, den 23.11.2010, 09:19 +0100 schrieb Peter Bex:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:32:24AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
== 2. Core development
The scrutinizer was updated to give a warning when a one-armed `if`
is used in tail-position, as suggested on chicken-users by Jörg
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 03:55 -0500 schrieb Felix:
If I had to deal with a name clash, I'd just put a renamer-module in
between.
This winds up in *much* less mental effort, than memorising new terms or
abbreviations for the same argument structure (modulo some type
replacements).
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 03:11 -0500 schrieb Felix:
For a Scheme (who would never ever - promised - participate in a
religious war ;-) the file kinda feels like Felix haven read too much CL
recently.
Yes, that may be, but being able to use a common API over various
sequences
I got one more idea, which would be great if possible at all:
Have a compiler switch (since it may break some code), which changes the
code to return zero values instead of the distinguished undefined value.
This should turn my problem into an exception as soon as I try to bind
the value to a
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 15:03 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 03:11 -0500 schrieb Felix:
For a Scheme (who would never ever - promised - participate in a
religious war ;-) the file kinda feels like Felix haven read too much CL
recently.
Yes
Great, forgot the link
How about stealing most from SRFI-1 like this?
... which does not actually work because
- an error in srfi-1 reference, which is fixed in chicken
- a typo
- an logical error when it comes to repeated traversal of a sequence in
the weird case.
here's a better
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 21:22 +0100 schrieb Peter Bex:
On Saturday another new thread (!) was started by Alan Post in which
he reported a bug in Chicken's keyword argument handling. He created a
ticket in Trac to help track this bug, but with the help of Alex and
Felix he found out it was
Hi Chickeners!
We need a new mailing list.
No, wait. I don't want to follow this on any mailing list. Please
let's have an RSS feed for those things I will all too often have hit
the button with the label mark all as read for live time reasons.
So. All following belongs into the section
Ups,
sorry. (interspersed with German -- for [personal] reasons)
not, not sorry, tut mir Leid -- was paßt aber genauso irrational ist.
There are obvious things, which are easier to convey face by face and in
native language.
So, spare me, expending my any (especially written AND non-native
or with print?
Am Samstag, den 20.11.2010, 16:12 +0100 schrieb Felix:
From: Jeronimo Pellegrini j...@aleph0.info
Subject: [Chicken-users] Problem with threads
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:10:28 -0200
(use srfi-18)
(define looping-thread
(let ((loop (lambda () (do ((i 0 (add1 i)))
Am Samstag, den 20.11.2010, 15:26 -0500 schrieb Hans Nowak:
On 11/18/10 10:03 AM, Felix wrote:
I've put together a little library of generic sequence operations,
and would like to get some feedback, since I'm not sure about the
nomenclature and API. Find it here:
Am Sonntag, den 21.11.2010, 18:08 +0100 schrieb Felix:
So, I wonder, why not use the same conventions? Instead, I see names
like 'size', 'elt', etc. Wouldn't it be clearer to use names like
sequence-length, or, if that is too verbose, seq-length, etc...?
I wanted to avoid name-clashes.
Am Freitag, den 19.11.2010, 15:10 -0200 schrieb Jeronimo Pellegrini:
Hello,
I'm using Chicken from git/master branch (commit
ddaacdfdb11a0a1c0d1e6363b1af3af78746575c).
I recently noticed a change in the behavior of Chicken's
scheduler. See this program:
(use srfi-18)
(define
Am Freitag, den 19.11.2010, 02:56 -0500 schrieb Felix:
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:42:42 +0100
I guess I found the reason: -local. Apparently it changed slightly
Am Mittwoch, den 17.11.2010, 23:53 +0100 schrieb Felix:
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net
Subject: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:56:29 +0100
Hi Chickeners!
I ran into a rare call of undefined value -- somewhere
Am Mittwoch, den 17.11.2010, 23:59 +0100 schrieb Felix:
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net
Subject: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:56:29 +0100
* The handling of -extend has changed in a way I do not yet completely
understand
Hi Chickeners!
I ran into a rare call of undefined value -- somewhere in the middle
of several KLOC of code.
So how to debug that? It turns out not to be an easy operation. Hence
my idea here.
So far I see two basic approaches to handle the undefined behaviour of
standards: a) refuse to
Am Mittwoch, den 03.11.2010, 12:53 +0100 schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:36:18PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
I wonder if it would be feasible to to support 'heavy strings' by a
compile time option. At worst this could imply that there would be
2 .so files per egg, one
Am Montag, den 01.11.2010, 07:21 -0400 schrieb Mario Domenech Goulart:
Moritz Heidkamp (http://wiki.call-cc.org/users/moritz-heidkamp) has
created
the zmq (http://wiki.call-cc.org/egg/zmq) egg, which contains bindings
for
the ZeroMQ (http://www.zeromq.org/) library.
This is awful. I did
Am Montag, den 25.10.2010, 07:05 -0600 schrieb Alan Post:
It's too bad there isn't any ARM platform use.
Apparently I missed the survey too.
Now let's add an ARM installation:
http://a6b4d4edd80044de521eaeeb3893bc663.dyndns.softeyes.net/A849640f672ed0df0958abc0712110f3c/
A Sheeva Plug under
Am Donnerstag, den 21.10.2010, 15:01 -0600 schrieb Alan Post:
So far so good, that is what I would expect. I'd like to work with
an mmap buffer like a string. Is it possible to create an object
that will treat the mmap area as a string that I can run regular
string operations on without
Am Mittwoch, den 27.10.2010, 09:53 -0700 schrieb Kon Lovett:
I recently noticed that several of the ##sys# prefixes have been
eliminated recently (elsewhere in the code).
?.
Sorry, no traces left. Just noticed on my way.
At worst it might be a case of making sure the overwrite
happens
my 0.02$ on this
a) this is a chicken mailing list, VCS's are a terrible matter - at
least for me - since they are a matter of taste (and I have none); So
better we are aware that we are off-topic!
b) every vcs I found until now was able to start a religious war even
*within* myself
c) so far I
Am Donnerstag, den 05.08.2010, 04:27 -0400 schrieb Felix:
Now, this is nice indeed. Thanks!
Agreed. But in a way I feel it would more chickenish if those
nice-to-have-things where in an egg, not the core system.
/Jerry
___
Chicken-users mailing
Am Montag, den 26.07.2010, 09:14 +0200 schrieb Felix:
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net
Subject: [Chicken-users] (apparently) solved; patch attached -- was: clueless
about memory consumption.
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:10:49 +0200
Hi all,
The attached diff
Am Montag, den 26.07.2010, 10:12 -0300 schrieb Stephen Eilert:
2010/7/26 Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net:
Struggling with git I apparently and unintentionally committed some
changes locally. No idea how to undo that.
git reset last 'good' commit --hard
should undo
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+chicken (4.5.6-0.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream version
+
+ -- Joerg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net Thu, 24 Jul 2010 13:41:00 +0200
+
+chicken (4.5.6-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream version
+
+ -- Joerg F
Am Samstag, den 24.07.2010, 14:10 +0200 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Hi all,
The attached diff against git head contains these modifications:
(define (##sys#make-thread thunk state name q)
(##sys#make-structure
'thread
thunk; #1 thunk
#f
Hi,
while I'm still not sure that I found the issue, at least I on spotted
something, which is definitely wrong in chicken: mutex-unlock!
Index: srfi-18.scm
===
--- srfi-18.scm
+++ srfi-18.scm
@@ -368,11 +368,12 @@
(lambda
Am Mittwoch, den 14.07.2010, 13:23 +0200 schrieb Moritz Heidkamp:
Dear Chickeneers,
...
And it works as advertised. However, if I close both the input and the
output ports of the process, all other threads seem to be blocked. If I
close none of them or only one of them, it works. The
Thanks a lot Felix!
Am Mittwoch, den 07.07.2010, 14:31 +0200 schrieb Felix:
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net
Subject: [Chicken-users] clueless about memory consumtion
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:09:44 +0200
I have added a procedure for dumping the object-counts
Am Mittwoch, den 07.07.2010, 14:31 +0200 schrieb Felix:
I have added a procedure for dumping the object-counts in the
heap (see experimental branch), called `##sys#dump-heap-state'.
Thanks Felix!
Now I've got quite some more data - and dunno how to make head or tail
of it.
Different results
Am Dienstag, den 06.07.2010, 00:19 +0200 schrieb Thomas Chust:
2010/7/5 Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net:
[...]
I'm surprised about the memory consumption pattern my chicken program
exhibits after some hours running.
[...]
whereby the difference has a change
Am Montag, den 05.07.2010, 00:33 +0200 schrieb Alejandro Forero Cuervo:
I'm experimenting with my format-compiler extension. I got past the
limitation preventing the module system from dealing with recursively
dependent modules
I would not call this a limitation. IMHO a module system, which
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 15:03 +0100 schrieb Thomas Chust:
2010/3/25 Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net:
[...]
I failed miserably when trying to link a chicken program statically.
[...]
using -static instead I end up with an executable of roughly 4MB..
which
Hi all,
I failed miserably when trying to link a chicken program statically.
I my case I tried tk, found in the manual/Extensions that I would have
to convert the egg first to support static linking. As a temporary
workaround I put the required csc call in my Makefile
csc -c tk.scm -unit tk
Hi,
I just made a cutpaste mistake. Now I feel chicken could do better
than segfault at this:
(define-syntax pass-a-ref
(define-syntax with-a-ref
(syntax-rules ()
((_ ref b) b)))
(syntax-rules ()
((pass-a-ref ref b name)
(let ((t (make-thread (lambda () b) name)))
A) and the segfault on reference in file B.
I'll be back if I have a reproducible case.
Am Sonntag, den 21.03.2010, 13:30 -0400 schrieb Mario Domenech Goulart:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:59 +0100 Jörg F. Wittenberger
joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net wrote:
I just made a cutpaste mistake. Now
a trivial definition appears to be missing from srfi-18:
condition-variable-name
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
+
+ * New version
+
+ -- Joerg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net Thu, 13 Feb 2009 14:08:00 +0200
+
chicken (3.2.0-0.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Added directory information to texi documentation file.
diff --git a/debian/chicken-bin.install b/debian/chicken-bin.install
index
Hi,
I found thread-signal not properly working when the target thread is in
sleeping state.
The attached patch fixes the issue.
/Jörg
diff --git a/srfi-18.scm b/srfi-18.scm
index f7c3324..205820d 100644
--- a/srfi-18.scm
+++ b/srfi-18.scm
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@
(syntax-rules ()
((_ . _)
Am Donnerstag, den 26.11.2009, 18:01 +0100 schrieb Sven Hartrumpf:
Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:52:37 +0100, Joerg.Wittenberger wrote:
be careful about new gcc version!
Yes, I can confirm this in some rare cases.
Does -optimize-level change Chickens optimization?
I hope so :-)
I meant to
High 5
be careful about new gcc version!
Am Mittwoch, den 25.11.2009, 22:48 +0100 schrieb Sven Hartrumpf:
I managed to avoid this segmentation fault by switching from
-optimize-level 3 to 2.
The gdb backtrace is not really useful, so we better forget
this error :-)
Does -optimize-level
Hi,
my experience might not be related to your problem here at all.
YMMV
But the past days I spent much time to track down a - for me new -
bug/problem relating to uhm, a special case: I recently upgraded to
ubuntu 9.10 on a amd64 plattform. All sudden my program ran into all
sorts of
I've got no idea what's going on here at all, but
to me the second request looks wrong in any case.
Shouldn't those parameter field separators be and never ; ???
Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2009, 12:53 +0100 schrieb Colin Fleming:
Using netcat and stunnel to see what's going on, it's very strange, I
Am Sonntag, den 26.07.2009, 18:59 -0400 schrieb Michael Maul:
Is there a way to define a module composed of multiple source files?
I've tried using a load in side the file where the module is defined
but that dosen't seem to work?
(include yoursouce.scm)
I'm confused (about chicken/trunk):
the current manual contains:
[procedure] (string-match REGEXP STRING [START])
[procedure] (string-match-positions REGEXP STRING [START])
my usage (from pcre times):
(string-match-positions compiled-match string offset flags)
note: a 4th (flags)
Hi all,
I just did a svn up and got a broken chicken compiler:
Error: bad argument count - received 3 but expected 2: #procedure
(every pred404 ls405)
I guess compiler.scm around line 413 the call to every looks
suspicious:
(define (walk-generic n class params subs)
(let ((subs2 (map
Am Sonntag, den 25.01.2009, 14:59 + schrieb Alaric Snell-Pym:
There are a few more minor issues related to higher load, which I
shall
post about (the one I currently have in my mind: beware of garbage
collection between fork and exec if finalizers might come into play,
since those
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 20:06 +0100 schrieb Peter Bex:
Better still, we could come up with a Scheme equivalent of Apache
Cocoon's pipelines, where you define regexp matchers on incoming URLs
and assign 'pipelines' to them. A Cocoon pipeline is a chain that
starts with one or
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 21:27 +0100 schrieb Peter Bex:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 03:01:30PM -0500, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
So, if you have to simulate features of the storage engine to get
compatibility, all you have to do is tell users that there are some
limitations
to it. Give
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 09:30 -0600 schrieb Lam Luu:
This is why I want to serialize continuations. If we can save it to
disk, or pass it between one one sever to another, we can scale it just
as we scale any other type of data
Hm, did you write this before my last posting regarding
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 19:29 +0100 schrieb david krentzlin:
The last i want is a framework that breaks or works against me as soon
as i need to do things the creators didn't think of.
Again from my perspective (i.e., I'm biased): with askemos.org there is
IMHO just one design
I've missed that posting (due to mail host faliure).
Am Freitag, den 16.01.2009, 10:18 + schrieb Alaric Snell-Pym:
On 12 Jan 2009, at 12:20 pm, Mor Phir wrote:
I was wondering if anyone on the ml where using chicken in a
enterprise enviroment.
*booming silence*
I'm sure there was
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 09:26 +0100 schrieb Basile STARYNKEVITCH:
Hello All
(my second mail of questions; I'm very newbie!)
Apparently the Chicken thread package is continuation based and does not
use pthread hence is not able to take of profit of several cores running
several
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 13:23 +0100 schrieb Peter Bex:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:01:10PM +0100, J?rg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Are there any Chicken packages which are blocking? More specifically,
can I run, using the http package, both HTTP client HTTP server some
other user
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2008, 08:58 +0100 schrieb felix winkelmann:
DESTDIR is the destination directory for installation. I'm not familiar
with the debian builds, but usually, this is set to install into a particular
directory for packing a binary distribution (note that this is not the
Hi all,
my reading of R5RS allows symbol-string to be implemented more
efficiently - though not as safe:
procedure: (symbol-string symbol)
Returns the name of symbol as a string. ... It is an error to apply
mutation procedures like string-set! to strings returned by this
procedure.
I'm
Hi all,
YMMV about that one. I have several string comparisons, where the
compared strings might turn out to be eq? too. Apparently often enough,
this patch saves almost 20% runtime for me.
/Jörg
Index: runtime.c
===
---
Hi Felix,
ich mag nicht alle paar Tage 'ne neue Version posten. Will Dich ja
nicht drängeln. Aber falls Du mal irgendwann doch noch dazu kommst: im
Anhang der Scheduler nochmal aufgeräumt. Funktional keine Änderung, nur
##sys#schedule sieht jetzt wirklich besser aus.
Sag, wäre das OK, wenn
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2008, 21:21 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Hi Felix,
[...]
sorry, this was obviously meant to be sent in private mail to Felix.
Nevertheless: enjoy the attachment. It should work as a drop in for the
old scheduler.scm. (You'll need the llrbtree.scm too.)
/Jörg
/chicken or
/var/lib/chicken/3 ?
Am Dienstag, den 09.12.2008, 13:30 +0100 schrieb felix winkelmann:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
my standard debian build method fails like this:
/home/jfw/build/Scheme/chicken/debian/tmp/usr/bin
Hi all,
I just tried the code below (compiled with disable-interrupts). Effect
on my server
httperf --hog --server 127.0.0.1 --port 2009 --num-conn 1000 --ra 100
--max-piped-calls 20 --timeout 1000
from ~8 request/second up to almost 12.
What's changed? a) remove a variable of no use b)
Am Montag, den 24.11.2008, 12:46 +0100 schrieb felix winkelmann:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be easy enough to compile the export file into memory or a temp
file and overwrite the old file only if there are differences
Hi,
I noticed that the .import.scm files are overwritten, whenever the
associated .scm file is compiled.
This defeats separate compilation of modules. If the (any) file holding
the exports where updated only if it's content really changed, it would
be useful in Makefiles to suppress superfluous
Am Samstag, den 22.11.2008, 18:38 -0500 schrieb John Cowan:
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
I noticed that the .import.scm files are overwritten, whenever the
associated .scm file is compiled.
That's because they are object files from the point of view of
compilation; the fact
Hi all,
yesterday I wrote that the scheduler I proposed might have a problem.
I can NOT confirm that. Contrary: I'm now rather sure now that is has
no problems at all. (Besided me forgetting to put
##sys#timeout-list-head in the hide declaration.)
(((I do however have plenty of other
Hi all,
That is, hi Felix - I guess. :-(
I ran into problems while compiling.
The old, previously working, version did
(include chicken-more-macros.scm)
together with a
(declare (run-time-macros))
with the intent to make those macros available to eval at runtime.
Now I found the file
Am Freitag, den 14.11.2008, 16:21 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Hi all,
the other day I posted some modifications to the scheduler.scm, which
speed it up dramatically it you use a lot of srfi-18 features.
[...]
Than I updated my chicken to prepare the posting. (See other message
Am Montag, den 17.11.2008, 14:04 +0100 schrieb felix winkelmann:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's code, which maps symbol-append+string-append over input
forms to ease typing. (The openssl.scm - not even my code.) I have no
idea how
Am Montag, den 17.11.2008, 15:04 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
When removed, compilation continues.
And when replaced with the obvious hygienic replacement:
(define-syntax end-of-file
(syntax-rules () ((end-of-file) #!eof)))
I'm dying from the same unreadable object too. So maybe
Am Freitag, den 14.11.2008, 15:50 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Hi all,
I did not update my chicken for a week or so. Now this pet can't
compile my code anymore (which hasn't been touched either since it
compiled successfully).
Forget about that one for now. I guess I found
Am Samstag, den 15.11.2008, 13:58 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Am Freitag, den 14.11.2008, 15:50 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Hi all,
I did not update my chicken for a week or so. Now this pet can't
compile my code anymore (which hasn't been touched either since
Am Samstag, den 15.11.2008, 14:56 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Am Samstag, den 15.11.2008, 13:58 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Am Freitag, den 14.11.2008, 15:50 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Hi all,
I did not update my chicken for a week or so. Now this pet can't
Hi all,
I did not update my chicken for a week or so. Now this pet can't
compile my code anymore (which hasn't been touched either since it
compiled successfully).
The message:
csc -c util-chicken.scm -include-path /home/jfw/build/Scheme/chicken
-include-path . -O2 -inline -feature
Hello Marc, Tobia, Felix and the chicken mailing list,
Am Montag, den 03.11.2008, 11:11 -0500 schrieb Marc Feeley:
Concerning the alternative priority queue implementations (wttree.scm,
llrbtree.scm and skip lists), you have to be careful because those
implementations allocate memory
Am Montag, den 03.11.2008, 10:23 +0900 schrieb Alex Shinn:
Jörg F. Wittenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My conclusion: I begin a Nuke copyright issues in my
way!-implementation of llrbtree.scm.
Left leaning red-black trees are definitely worth trying,
I'm looking forward to seeing
Am Montag, den 03.11.2008, 11:11 -0500 schrieb Marc Feeley:
So please remove those legal road blocks.
In any case, the copyright information must be maintained, simply
to indicate who has intellectual property of the code (i.e. an
acknowledgement of who designed and wrote the code).
Am Samstag, den 01.11.2008, 09:51 -0400 schrieb Marc Feeley:
On 31-Oct-08, at 10:11 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Thankful for a suggestion from Marc Feeley I reused rbtree.scm from
the
snowfort repository. The attached version extends the snow version by
optionally generating
301 - 400 of 532 matches
Mail list logo
