I've just merged all the docs and samples changes since we branched
(except those related to unmerged features) to 249, so that Nick can
flip the switch and make code.google.com reflect beta.
Please remember if you're making changes after this point to docs or
samples (or reviewing changes) to
Automatically closing tree for update on Linux Tests (valgrind)(1)
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Linux%20Tests%20%28valgrind%29%281%29/builds/1821
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/waterfall?builder=Linux%20Tests%20%28valgrind%29%281%29
--= Automatically
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
I've gone through and gardened the bugs per our goals for stable:
Win, linux: http://bit.ly/5s4lrp
Mac: http://bit.ly/8hHpdO
Surely I'm missing some, but this should be a start.
I know you had to decide to boot some
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org wrote:
a) We don't have good support for untabbed browsing; if we really wanted to
support that we should have a --no-tabs mode which removes the tab strip and
forces NEW_TAB to NEW_WINDOW, but I don't think we want to support it.
Greetings chromium-developers,
Sorry for my beginner's question in advance.
To fix a long-lasting issues: Issue 11577 (*1) and Issue 23497 (*2), I
have implemented a MockSpellcheck class (*3), which is a mock
implementation of our spell-checker used for layout tests. Even though
this change can
Hi Horonori,
Thanks for taking a look at this!!
What kinds of differences are you seeing without the new spellchecker class?
The only notable difference seems to be that the fonts are slightly
different vs. the expected output.
Where is the expected output coming from? What OS version are you
Thanks Lei for fixing everything!
M-A
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
I also needed to install libpam0g-dev. Linux_view try bots should be happy
now.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
It'll reload the try server
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
I've gone through and gardened the bugs per our goals for stable:
Win, linux: http://bit.ly/5s4lrp
Mac: http://bit.ly/8hHpdO
Surely I'm missing some,
To assist users when they have too many tabs open, they should be able to
split the window into two tabs.
User action: Right click a tab, from context-menu select Split window
Browser's action: makes a new window featuring all the tabs to the right,
including the tab which was right-clicked.
Hello friends.
I have just one day using chromium, and the truth is that I am very
happy with this browser. Thanks for your work.
Today at work, a friend and I raised quite doubts about the use of
the
operation of cookies in browsers. The ultimate question is quite
simple to ask:
Knowing that
See also http://crbug.com/1237
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Nathan J. Brauer m...@nathanbrauer.com wrote:
To assist users when they have too many tabs open, they should be able to
split the window into two tabs.
User action: Right click a tab, from context-menu select Split window
That's all, thanks.
- a
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 21:23, Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.org wrote:
I wrote up this section under our Tree Sheriff page:
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/tree-sheriffs#TOC-Disabling-tests
Thanks! I expanded the section to also mention the FLAKY_ prefix
(which is very helpful in
a) what labels will a bug that's been deemed merge-worthy have?
b) isn't the next beta cut from ToT? are we planning to re-release the
current beta?
-- Evan Stade
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Aaron Boodman a...@google.com wrote:
That's all, thanks.
- a
--
Chromium Developers mailing
Hello again guys.
Keep thinking on the issue and giving you more possibilities.
Images we have two tabs open:
- Tab A: an open session with gmail
- Tab B: nothing
And then:
- Tab A: an open session with gmail
- Tab B: start gmail
Chromium could be made to warn us through some sort of icon in
Chromium code has the concept of a Profile. All renderers are associated
with a profile. There is one cookie store per profile.
By default, renderers are all given the same profile. When you use
Incognito mode, for the purposes of cookies you can think of it like
creating a new profile which
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org wrote:
a) what labels will a bug that's been deemed merge-worthy have?
I dunno if there is an existing convention for this, but I was
thinking we just leave the bug open. Basically everything on mstone-4
releaseblock-stable needs to
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org wrote:
a) what labels will a bug that's been deemed merge-worthy have?
I dunno if there is an existing convention for this, but I was
thinking we just leave
There's also the FixedUnreleased status, which we usually use for
security bugs. That seems to fit this use case too.
Adam
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:55
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Jeremy Moskovich jer...@chromium.orgwrote:
Hi Horonori,
Thanks for taking a look at this!!
What kinds of differences are you seeing without the new spellchecker
class?
The only notable difference seems to be that the fonts are slightly
different vs. the
Hello Chromium,
Continuing with my interest in Chromium's effect on battery life I've
been playing with an ARM build of Chromium on the BeagleBoard, with
power instrumentation. I've taken power measurements showing Firefox
and Chromium at cold start, warm start and loading Gmail.
Hi Jeremy,
Thank you for your quick response.
To check the source of the expected image, I notice it comes from the
WebKit tree (i.e.
third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/platform/mac/editing/selection/unrendered-002-expected.png).
So, I would like to run WebKit layout tests, see its output images,
and
Hi all,
I'm developing on the Mac, and I'm trying to write a ui_test to verify HTTP
auth behavior for shared workers (specifically, I want to make sure that if
you have two parent documents for a shared worker, and the first one closes,
http auth requests from the worker still trigger the
It shouldn't be too bad to support that automation on all platforms. It is
probably just a matter of teaching the frontend code that shows / hides the
dialog to generate some notifications or respond to some automation
commands.
It definitely seems like we should support the LoginPromptTest on
+chromium-dev
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Dominic Mazzoni dmazz...@google.comwrote:
Hi,
Here's an experimental proposal I'd like to throw out there. All types of
suggestions, criticism, and questions are welcome.
- Dominic
*
*
*Overview*
This experimental API exposes information
(Disclaimer: I know very little about a11y.)
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Erik Kay erik...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Dominic Mazzoni dmazz...@google.com
This experimental API exposes information about focused controls in the
native ui, like dialog boxes and the
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 03:22, Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org wrote:
The closest thing I found to what I want is the LoginPromptTest ui_tests,
but these seem only to work on Windows because the automation framework
doesn't yet support NotificationType::AUTH_NEEDED on anything but windows:
27 matches
Mail list logo
