Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Daniel A. White
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I just found this Chromium rendering engine called Awesomium.
>
> Daniel A. White
>
Alas, Awesomium does not support the "value-added" browser-like capabilities
that we would want in our ActiveX control. Wh
I just found this Chromium rendering engine called Awesomium.
Daniel A. White
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Marshall Greenblatt <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Amanda,
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Amanda Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> It depends a little on what you want
Hi Amanda,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Amanda Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It depends a little on what you want to do. Do you want to embed the
> entire UI, tab strip and all, or do you want to embed web views? It
> sounds a little from your description that you're reinventing th
It depends a little on what you want to do. Do you want to embed the
entire UI, tab strip and all, or do you want to embed web views? It
sounds a little from your description that you're reinventing the
multiprocess wheel--you can already invoke a renderer process and talk
it via an IPC channel-
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Marshall Greenblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think it would be nice to leverage chromium's multi-process
> architecture
> > in a COM context. The chromium browser process would be hosted in
> > a local COM server ex
I wish I knew COM programming. At this point, I'm still starting to
learn MFC.
On Nov 14, 1:44 am, "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds good-ish to me. Go forth and code a demo...?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscr
Marshall Greenblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it would be nice to leverage chromium's multi-process architecture
> in a COM context. The chromium browser process would be hosted in
> a local COM server executable.
> Each browser window requested by the container
> application (and crea
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm familiar with straight COM C++ and MIDL and can imagine how that might
> look, but I don't know enough about the issues with ATL. I've heard some
> objections to ATL in the past.
>
> At any rate, it'd be good to
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Marshall Greenblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hi Darin,
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> There is no existing COM-style Chrome component that can be easily
>> embedded for web rendering.
>> -Darin
>>
>
> Do you (
Hi Darin,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no existing COM-style Chrome component that can be easily embedded
> for web rendering.
> -Darin
>
Do you (or Google, or Chromium) have a preference when it comes to COM
frameworks? It would be nice to
If anyone is interested in helping me, I would like to venture to
start one then.
On Nov 13, 7:14 pm, Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no existing COM-style Chrome component that can be easily embedded
> for web rendering.
> -Darin
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:05 PM, thetrueapl
There is no existing COM-style Chrome component that can be easily embedded
for web rendering.
-Darin
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:05 PM, thetrueaplus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Is there a way to embed Chromium as a component in a Win32 or MFC
> application? I would like to build it into my app
12 matches
Mail list logo
