I did propose that to the WebKit developer list a few years back but I
suppose it is time again. Unless things have changed, they seem dead
set against anything that is not open source.
Paul
On Dec 4, 11:06 pm, Darin Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An extension like that would have to involve
As an argument, you could say that isn't it funny activex controls can
override the specified viewport size and even resize itself whenever
it wants while a NPAPI has no control on its viewport?
M-A
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:52 AM, PaulTopping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did propose that to
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:09 AM, PaulTopping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't NPAPI considered somewhat dead technology? Supported but not a
venue for enhancement.
No, there is a group dedicated to enhancing it, and proposals for how to
improve things. It doesn't get as much attention as a lot
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:06 AM, PaulTopping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know, NPAPI requires that
the amount of space the equation takes up on a page be known in
advance, rather than be calculated at run-time to be dependent on the
MathML content. There is no support for baseline
On Dec 2, 9:59 am, Peter Kasting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:06 AM, PaulTopping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know, NPAPI requires that
the amount of space the equation takes up on a page be known in
advance, rather than be calculated at run-time to be
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM, PaulTopping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was my hope that others would read this and
think of problems it might solve. SVG support could be done this way,
as I suggested. In general, I think it leads to a more modular
approach to browser architecture. It would
Actually, our MathPlayer implementation in Internet Explorer is a good
proof-of-concept. It is a plugin that interfaces with IE using a small
set of interfaces most of which (events, DOM) already would exist in
any browser. It performs very well and has been available for years,
starting with IE
I know this might sound off topic, but why don't you code a JavaScript
parser? It could be easily ported to other browsers.
Daniel A. White
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:54 PM, PaulTopping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, our MathPlayer implementation in Internet Explorer is a good
The right place to put MathML support, I think, would be in WebKit.
That way Safari and other browsers benefit too.
The WebKit project has an open bug indicating they would like support:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3251
They also have a working patch for some preliminary support,
Sure, but they don't have a plugin mechanism capable of supporting it.
This was the reason for my post. For business reasons, we do not want
to make MathPlayer open source. Our MathML rendering engine and math-
to-speech software are core parts of our business. We have approached
the Safari
10 matches
Mail list logo
