On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.org
wrote:
2) Most of the supposed performance advantage of strict aliasing
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Craig Schlenter craig.schlen...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Stephen White
senorbla...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Dan Kegel d
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
In this bug
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28749
It seems we're running afoul of a more finicky compiler not
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Victor Khimenko k...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
How about:
int fd = open(file_or_url, O_RDONLY);
if (fd = 0) {
close(fd);
OpenLocalFile(file_or_url);
} else {
OpenURL(file_or_url
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.orgwrote:
We have http://crbug.com/4436, and the problem is that if you launch
chrome index.html (with index.html in the current directory) it will
try to navigate to http://index.html/ instead. This behavior is useful
for
Go ahead and revert, I'm in a meeting. Sorry for this.
- Brett (writing from Antoine's computer)
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org wrote:
Brett, any progress? If I don't hear anything from you soon I'll revert
the patch.
erik
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 13:49,
If you don't build on linux, you can stop reading now.
For the incoming gpu plugin on linux, the following new packages are needed:
* mesa-common-dev
* libgl1-mesa-dev
* libglu1-mesa-dev
The gpu plugin change is not checked in yet (some of the slaves didn't get
those packages), but will
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Kevin Millikin kmilli...@chromium.org
wrote:
I'm trying to build Linux 32-bit on 64-bit Ubuntu 8.04.
The closest think I've found
is
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com
wrote
the gclient sync. That broke the whole thing.
Does anyone know how I could get back to the old revision of source ?
Thanks,
Sofia
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Sofia Tahseen
sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Antoine
. If it is not, the compiler should refuse NEON assembly...
Antoine
Thanks,
Sofia
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen
sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Joel/Erik/All,
I don't think armv5 is an issue
on chromium browser and make chromium working on a hardware that does not
support NEON?
Is it still crashing in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon ?
Thanks,
Sofia
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Joel/Erik/All,
I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5
libraries to build chrome.
I tried to debug the issue with gdb.
gdb chrome
GNU gdb 6.8-debian
Copyright (C) 2008 Free
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:50 PM, SOFIA TAHSEEN dnk...@motorola.com wrote:
Hi Antoine/Joel,
When I try to build using the following make command I get the error as
below...Have you seen this earlier :
make -r -j3 BUILDTYPE=Release chrome
(I have a dual core so used -j3)
CXX(target)
use_system_ffmpeg=1
gclient sync
Let me know if I am doing something wrong.
Try with a newer version of CodeSourcery. I haven't had this issue with
2009q1 or 2009q3.
I'm working on a fix anyway, see http://codereview.chromium.org/464064
Antoine
Thanks,
Sofia
On Dec 7, 5:13 pm, Antoine Labour
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com wrote:
I found many places using -m32 cflags. but my gcc can recognize it.
How do you compile?
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxChromiumArm
Antoine
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com wrote:
I found many places using -m32 cflags. but my gcc can recognize
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.org
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com
wrote
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Mark Larson (Google) m...@chromium.orgwrote:
The LinuxBuildInstructions got deleted from the Wiki:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/source/detail?r=1495
Anyone know why?
I restored them. Someone on IRC mentioned that they were using them, but
then they
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:23 PM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you please tell me how can I remove all .o after the build?
I tried 'make clean', but it said there is no 'clean' target'.
% find out -type f -name
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 7:21 AM, rahul rahulsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry about the late reply(I am in a different timezone and when my
comment didn't appear after 12 hours of submission, I thought it had
been pruned).
@Eric Roman
What class do you get this error on?
I actually got fed up
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
This works for warnings we know about now, but not warnings that will
occur in the future, which is the larger problem.
I'd say we break the
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Fabien Tassin f...@sofaraway.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 12:06 -0800, Evan Martin wrote:
I'd say we break the automated Ubuntu builds every couple of weeks
(and get an additional report from users at about that same rate).
I don't mind when my
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:24 PM, David Moore davemo...@google.com wrote:
Since I did this upgrade my builds have gotten very very slow. A single
file change, recompile and relink used to be about 35 seconds. Now it's 2
and a half minutes. As far as I can tell I'm using the right gold.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Andy Quan androidr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that SKIA is by default using floating point calculation
inside android. Does this mean that if the CPU has VFP unit, SKIA will
run faster?
I asked this due to my interest in JPEG viewer on android which
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Joel Stanley j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:23, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
That's really a question for the Android team, not Chromium...
As far as Chrome's use of Skia, if you compile for ARMv7, you'll get NEON
acceleration
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.orgwrote:
it'd be nice to have a gclient config lean or something like that.
It'd be nice for it to be the default in fact.
Antoine
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)
b...@chromium.orgwrote:
it'd be nice to have a gclient config lean or something like
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
I get
NameError: name '_toolset' is not defined while loading dependencies
of base/base.gyp while loading dependencies of app/app.gyp while
loading dependencies of build/all.gyp while trying to load
build/all.gyp
when
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I've spent a good deal of this week trying to track down what turned out to
be a simple but fairly common problem: I forgot virtual dispatch only
partially works in destructors. There have been several email threads
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
I've spent a good deal of this week trying to track down what turned out
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Just to be clear for those of us who are wobbly on C++, this is
because during the constructor or destructor, your object is of the
class in
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
General comments: Linux tends to be lighter which means it does
better on older hardware, so depending on what sorts of laptops you're
talking
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
ajw...@chromium.orgwrote:
I actually got some weird warnings on the make build a while back when I
specified the same file in two sources entries...something about circular
dependencies and make ignore one. But don't remember the exact
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
ajw...@chromium.org wrote:
I actually got some weird warnings on the make build a while back when I
specified the same file in two sources entries...something about
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Michael Moss mm...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏)
u...@chromium.org wrote:
On x86_64 machine, I couldn't build even if I clobber..
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
different
flags.
TVL
That means duplicating every rule that is needed for host and target though.
Antoine
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
If you don't care about gyp or cross-compiling, you can skip this message.
I've been experimenting with adding
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
If you don't care about gyp or cross-compiling, you can skip this
message.
I've been experimenting with adding host support for cross-compiling
If you don't care about gyp or cross-compiling, you can skip this message.
I've been experimenting with adding host support for cross-compiling into
gyp. By this, I mean being able to use the cross-compiler to build Chrome,
but still using the host compiler for build tools. Regular Chrome, with v8
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
undefined reference to
BlockedPopupContainer::kImpossibleNumberOfPopups
Aha. It's a bug in our code. chrome/browser/blocked_popup_container.cc
needs to
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
undefined
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:02 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org wrote:
We try to fire the timer rapidly, but if we get bogged down, it just
won't fire until later; when it actually does fire, we update our state
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Daniel mpc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to cross compile chromium to ARM, but I'm getting errors in
the native client code.
./native_client/src/include/elf.h:68:3: error: #error
NACL_TARGET_SUBARCH must be defined to be 32 or 64
It looks like I have to
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Steven Knight s...@chromium.org wrote:
Heads up for those using the GYP make generator: the GYP update last night
included a patch from mattm to add dependencies to the generated Makefiles
to run gyp to auto-regenerate the Makefiles if the .gyp file(s) change.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:30 PM, krtulmay krtul...@gmail.com wrote:
Sentence case is terrible. Can't understand why Vista HIG would choose
that. After all, why use Sentence case on all these things that are
*not* sentences?
Definitely should use Title Case, even for Windows. After all,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:03 AM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.orgwrote:
Can't we blacklist nspluginwrapper, and use the same logic that it uses to
find the real plugins?
Last time I looked, the way nspw works: for each wrapped plugin it installs
a version of the nspw plugin into the
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Scott Hesssh...@chromium.org wrote:
Would it be possible/reasonable to use distcc plus a farm of
cross-compiler machines to let you do faster self-hosted builds? It's
not the right solution, but in the past I've found it to sometimes
be an easier path to take
There's growing interest from several parties in getting Chrome to
cross-compile onto linux/ARM. Let's make sure everyone is on the same
page so that we don't duplicate efforts.
I understand that Joel Stanley, Dean McNamee and Lei Zhang have
already been doing a lot of work towards that. There's
There's growing interest from several parties in getting Chrome to
cross-compile onto linux/ARM. Let's make sure everyone is on the same
page so that we don't duplicate efforts.
I understand that Joel Stanley, Dean McNamee and Lei Zhang have
already been doing a lot of work towards that. There's
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
- Gyp
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Erik Corryerik.co...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/21 Antoine Labour pi...@google.com:
There's growing interest from several parties in getting Chrome to
cross-compile onto linux/ARM. Let's make sure everyone is on the same
page so that we don't duplicate efforts
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
Yes, but even then we need to know how the launcher is named. Hardcoding
google-chrome is not good for chromium builds (and we are going to have
Chromium packaged for Gentoo). Having it chromium for Chromium is also
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)ajw...@chromium.org wrote:
I've noticed that most public functions on MessageLoop are non-virtual. How
bad would it be to make PostTask, and its variants, virtual? Are the perf
implications or similar that would be bad?
I'd like to be able
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Brian Rynerbry...@google.com wrote:
The -fvisibility=hidden flag is maybe supposed to do this (see
discussion on http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility ), but I tried
building both with and
So, sandboxing is in on linux, which is awesome. But how do I debug
sandbox-related issues (in my case, why I can't create a shared memory
buffer from the renderer when sandboxing is on). If I specify a
--renderer-cmd-prefix, it doesn't use the zygote process, and I don't
get sandboxed. If I let
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Adam Langleya...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Antoine Labourpi...@google.com wrote:
What's the best practice for debugging sanbox-related issues ?
Usually you can just ask me: the reason you can't create shared memory
is because you're
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Antoine Labourpi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Adam Langleya...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Antoine Labourpi...@google.com wrote:
What's the
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
* If you update your google-chrome-unstable packages and your
development builds start hanging, sync to = 20710 *
Details:
The latest google-chrome packages contain a sandbox binary, which the
development builds of
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Antoine Labourpi...@google.com wrote:
Does this part need to be sticky, or is it just to build the
chrome-devel-sandbox ? If the former it is going to be painful.
You only need to build
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Dan Kegeldaniel.r.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
I did
rm Makefile
gclient runhooks --force
and it didn't regenerate Makefile.
tools/gyp/gyp -f make build/all.gyp
does rebuild it.
Seems like gclient runhooks --force ought to, no?
Are you seeing the same thing
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Dan Kegeld...@kegel.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Antoine Labourpi...@google.com wrote:
Are you seeing the same thing I am seeing ? For me, through gclient,
Makefile is generated one directory up and is messed up.
By gum, yes:
$ diff Makefile
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
For what it's worth, I was really impressed by the O3D documentation:
http://code.google.com/apis/o3d/docs/index.html
Not sure how they did it, but I believe it was all generated. Not sure if
that's close enough to
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:57 PM, vijaytec...@gmail.com wrote:
Preferably a browser-independent way would be great.
Thanks in advance,
Vijay
I believe the best way to do that is to use NPRuntime. Essentially,
you programatically query window.location.href using a series of
NPN_GetProperty.
2009/6/3 Randall Spangler rspang...@google.com:
Hi Dean,
Croc (the coverage utility) currently takes an expansive view of which files
need to be covered. That's to catch cases where a new source file is added,
but not compiled into any tests.
The rules which Croc uses on linux are a
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
I get different stories about this all the time from different people.
It would be great to have them as part of the style guide so that I
can
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org:
2009/5/15 Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) w...@google.com
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org:
2009/5/15 Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) w...@google.com
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org:
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain
67 matches
Mail list logo
