an elevated command prompt:
t.cmd srvon
Start network capture
Reproduce the issue
t.cmd srvoff
Stop network capture
Upload the t.cab and network trace to the workspace.
I will be sending you the workspace information in a separate email.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Volker,
I will investigate and follow-up on this case.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:41 PM
To: Sebastian Canevari
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol]
[case number in subject]
[casemail to cc]
Andrew,
I will investigate this and follow-up.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller (MOD)
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 8:14 AM
To: Andrew Bartlett
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: Behaviour of UF_LOCKOUT compared
[case number in subject]
[casemail to cc]
[dochelp to bcc]
Simo,
The case number 113102010876826 has been created for this inquiry. One of our
team members will follow-up soon.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: simo [mailto:i...@samba.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 5:06
[case number in subject]
[casemail to cc]
[dochelp to bcc]
Andrew,
The case number 113101710870929 has been created for this inquiry. One of our
team members will follow-up soon.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday,
...
Thanks,
Edgar
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 11:37 AM
To: Nadezhda Ivanova
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG113100710843173]: Question about LDAP delete operation on
Administrator and other built-in accounts
Nadia,
I will investigate
: Edgar Olougouna; cifs-protocol@cifs.org; p...@tridgell.net; MSSolve Case
Email
Subject: Re: [REG:112120310051084] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:08:47 +0100
David Disseldorp dd...@suse.de wrote:
Furthermore, FILE_READ_DATA access on the source file does not appear
David,
Thank you for the comments. I will review this and follow-up.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: David Disseldorp [mailto:dd...@suse.de]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:09 AM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org; p...@tridgell.net; MSSolve Case Email
Subject
Gordon,
I will assist you in answering this inquiry. Let's me first recommend the
following overview documents.
[MS-DISO]/[MS-ADOD] provided an overview of domain join scenarios (see
references).
Particularly [MS-DISO] Sections 6.1.3.4 and 6.2.3 define the assumptions and
pre-conditions
Thanks Matthieu,
I will review the code, trace this error and find out the possible reasons.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@matws.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 1:19 AM
To: Edgar Olougouna; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject
[case number in subject]
[dochelp to bcc]
Michael,
The case number 112091915263549 has been created to track this inquiry. I will
assist you in resolving this issue.
In the SMB2_CREATE_APP_INSTANCE_ID Create Context:
DataOffset: 36 (0x24) should be DataOffset: 32 (0x20) and no padding is
. The response is sent on the session that receives the
acknowledgment, as documented in 3.3.5.22.2 Processing a Lease Acknowledgment.
A future MS-SMB2 update will clarify that Lease break notifications are not
encrypted.
Regards,
Edgar
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 12:06 AM
Metze,
While investigating this, I also opened a separate case (112082770583609) for
the ECHO command.
A document bug has been opened to clarify SMB3 encryption regarding the ECHO
command.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:06 PM
.
If Session.EncryptData is FALSE, the response being sent is not
SMB2_NEGOTIATE or SMB2 SESSION_SETUP or SMB2 TREE_CONNECT, and
Share.EncryptData for the share associated with the TreeId in the SMB2 header
of the response is TRUE.
Regards,
Edgar
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012
and Oplock/Lease break notifications
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:19 AM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-protocol@cifs.org
Subject: Re: [REG:112080864018345] SMB3 encryption over
, so they won’t be signed. From
what I am observing they should not be encrypted as well.
A document bug has been opened to clarify these behaviors in MS-SMB2. I will
confirm you when updates are available.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Thursday, August
) Metzmacher; Edgar Olougouna
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-protocol@cifs.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:112080864018345] SMB3 encryption over multiple requests
Metze,
Slight change in plan to load balance on this side: my colleague Edgar (copied)
will help you on this issue.
Bryan
-Original
. If ChannelSequence in the request is not less than Open.ChannelSequence,
the server MUST decrement Open.OutstandingRequestCount by 1.
Regards,
Edgar
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:27 PM
To: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-protocol@cifs.org
Subject: [REG
Metze,
I am taking care of this question (case 112080853508014).
After reviewing the source code, I will be opening a document bug.
I will update you as soon as I have news.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Sreekanth Nadendla
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 10:38 AM
To: Stefan
Chris,
After review, a document bug has been opened to fix the issues you reported.
The changes will appear in a future release of the document.
As always, thanks for the feedback.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:48 AM
[bcc Dochelp, Tom Talpey]
[Added case number in subject]
Chris,
Thanks for reporting this issue. I have created a case number 112053052848843
on this. One of our engineers will review this and open a document bug as
appropriate.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R.
to
use a stronger 3-part SPN (service class/host:port/service name) for
authentication.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 12:02 PM
To: Christian Ambach
Cc: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher; cifs-protocol@cifs.org; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: [REG
[Dochelp to bcc]
Matthieu,
This issue is being tracked as case 112021212002899. An acknowledgement has
been sent as well.
One of our teammates will follow-up with you soon.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Darryl Welch
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 12:17 PM
To:
).
This has been seen with non-Windows servers as well.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 3:16 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC
Andrew,
Regarding your observation on “MS-KILE 3.3.5.3.2.3 Server Signature”:
We confirm that the document is correct.
The statement:
“the strongest cryptography that the domain supports”
is related to the SignatureType of the checksum instead of the server account
key.
Based on this
[Dochelp to bcc]
[Adding case number in subject]
Matthieu,
I will investigate this and follow-up.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Canevari
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 4:55 PM
To: m...@samba.org; Interoperability Documentation Help;
cifs-proto...@samba.org;
Vista and Windows Server 2008 SMB2 servers fail an IOCTL request with
STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER if [ max(InputCount, MaxInputResponse) +
max(OutputCount, MaxOutputResponse) ] is greater than 256*1024.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 1
[Dochelp to bcc]
[Case number in subject]
Andrew,
One of our teammates will follow-up on this issue. The case number is
01553031054.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 12:51 AM
To: Interoperability
Metze,
I have investigated this and engaged the product team to clarify SMB2 IOCTL
sizes limit. I will update you as soon as I have news.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:47 AM
To: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher (me...@samba.org
to
the downstream partner, which will cause the file to be recreated on the next
CMD_SEND_STAGE request from the downstream partner.
/Excerpt
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:05 AM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: p
[Dochelp to bcc]
[Adding case number in subject]
Metze,
I have opened the case number 01256623456 for this inquiry. One of my
colleagues will take ownership and follow up soon.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent:
in Use
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822300
How to configure the File Replication Service to allow fewer sharing violations
that block replication
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816493
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 3:52 PM
To: 'm
standards. We are reviewing the best option to publish an
informative content to prescribe that clients should not attempt to ask
multiple questions in the same DNS packet. This would eventually be in the form
of a KB article.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent
replica set members have the same file GUID.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 9:57 AM
To: 'm...@samba.org'; 'p...@tridgell.net'; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'
Subject: RE: Precisions for FRSRPC
Matthieu,
Question 2:
In paragraph
[Dochelp to bcc]
Thanks Matthieu for this input, I will investigate and follow up.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 3:48 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna; Interoperability Documentation Help; p...@tridgell.net;
cifs
/library/dd340857(v=PROT.13).aspx
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 10:53 AM
To: m...@samba.org
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: RE: [REG: 111091521929950 ]RE: about multi packet file transfer in
FRSRPC
Matthieu
Matthieu,
I am investigating this and will follow up as soon I have news.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Obaid Farooqi
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 1:10 AM
To: m...@samba.org
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: [REG:
[Adding case number in subject]
Matthieu,
I will investigate this and update you as soon as I have news.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Josh Curry
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 6:20 PM
To: m...@samba.org; Interoperability Documentation Help; p...@tridgell.net;
Adding Hongwei who is the owner of this issue.
He will follow-up with you soon.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Steve French [mailto:smfre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 4:54 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: Re: Level
[Dochelp to bcc]
Steve,
One of our engineers will follow-up soon on this inquiry. The case number is
111081664438980.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Steve French [mailto:smfre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc:
is Created During Domain Controller Promotion
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 5:13 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: Hongwei Sun; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111071166110452
.
Please send the new TTT trace and a full network capture as well.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 4:52 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna; m...@samba.org
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111071166110452] access
in the MS-NRPC document.
Related KB: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/942564
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 4:41 PM
To: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: [REG: 111070650721347] Behavior
uploaded files.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 4:52 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna; m...@samba.org
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111071166110452] access denied in
NetrLogonSamLogonEx
Edgar
Yes, your observation is correct. By storing both in the file, this allows the
importkey to validate that it has not been tampered.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 2:43 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: Bryan Burgin; MSSolve Case Email
Chris,
Thanks for sharing the good news! The fact that you got the decryption working
with two different AES implementations (e.g. Mcrypt and OpenSSL) shows that we
nailed down most important details required for successful non-Windows
implementation. Hopefully, this has value for testing
[Adding case number]
Metze,
I am taking care of this. I have opened a document issue on MS-NRPC. I will
follow-up as soon as I have news.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Josh Curry
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 10:21 AM
To: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher; Interoperability
Hi Chris,
Just a quick follow-up, the block size is 16.
Thanks,
Edgar
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
Chris,
Please find a quick recap of the current status. Let me know whether this helps.
* The AES-256 encryption is in CBC mode.
* A default initialization vector with a block of all 0x00 bytes (i.e. 16
bytes of zeros) can be used, and has the same effect as if no IV was being
48 bytes in length.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 11:32 AM
To: 'Christopher R. Hertel'
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for
netsh branchcache” importkey and exportkey
Chris,
I will follow-up as soon as I have the answers.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@samba.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:53 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061756137964
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061069959469] BranchCache and SMB2:
Questions specific to BranchCache.
Edgar,
Thanks for the clarifications.
Regarding the dwOffsetInFirstSegment and dwReadBytesInLastSegment fields...
I have a working
[Adding Hongwei]
Matthieu,
I transferred this issue to Hongwei who is investigating this for you. Thanks
for your patience.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 1:50 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: p...@tridgell.net
, it is automatically generated.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 10:49 AM
To: 'Christopher R. Hertel'
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061069959469] BranchCache and SMB2:
Questions specific
to the document.
Thanks again for the numerous observations.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 2:14 PM
To: 'Christopher R. Hertel'
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111051857287367] BranchCache and SMB2:
Questions
Hi Tridge,
Thanks again for collecting the traces. We will investigate and follow-up soon.
Best regards,
Edgar
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
Tridge,
If you have a chance to repro the issue, could you collect the following traces
to facilitate narrowing down the root cause.
- ETW for DNS,
- TTT trace,
- NetSetup,
- Network capture.
Please enable the following GUIDs for ETW tracing.
logman create trace minio_dns -ow -o
Chris,
Thanks for the numerous observations. I will review the questions and follow-up
as soon as I have an update.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@ubiqx.com]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:57 AM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: cifs-proto
Chris,
I am actively working on this with the product team to clarify a few more
points. I will update you as soon as possible.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@ubiqx.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 5:57 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: MSSolve Case
then, dwReadBytesInLastSegment should be zero
and dwOffsetInFirstSegment should be zero.
The product team will be reflecting the above clarification in the protocol
document. Let me know whether this answers your questions.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Tuesday
Yes, that will help the investigation.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@ubiqx.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 11:46 AM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [REG:111051857287367] BranchCache and SMB2: Questions specific
Chris,
Thanks for providing the traces and detailed information. I will follow-up as
soon I have an update.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@ubiqx.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:17 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
(that is, it has FLAG_SCHEMA_BASE_OBJECT present in its
systemFlags attribute), the Modify fails, with error unwillingToPerform /
unrestricted.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 4:14 PM
To: m...@samba.org; cifs-proto...@samba.org; p
, can be consulted on this behavior.
Best regards,
Edgar
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:25 PM
To: 'nivan...@samba.org'; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: Question about MS-DTYP 2.5.3.4 Algorithm for Creating a Security
Descriptor
Nadya,
I am researching
Matthieu,
I am taking care of this and will update you as soon I complete my research.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 5:13 AM
To: p...@tridgell.net; Interoperability Documentation Help;
!
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 5:51 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: Jeff Layton; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110121055487273] Requesting
-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 5:39 PM
To: Jeff Layton
Cc: Edgar Olougouna; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case
Email
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of
CIFS client timeout
of receiving
the SMB_COM_ECHO response, the client closes the connection if there is no
response to the outstanding commands that have exceeded the
Client.SessionTimeoutValue.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 1:45 PM
To: 'Jeff
The pcap format of the capture is fine. I am able to open this in Netmon. I
will update you as soon I have news.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Layton [mailto:jlay...@poochiereds.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Layton
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 6:01 AM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc
?
Answer:
Yes, there is no behavior change in recent versions of Windows.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 4:24 PM
To: Jeff Layton; 'Christopher R. Hertel'
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE
Jeff,
Could you provide some network captures so I can further investigate the
behavior you described?
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Layton [mailto:jlay...@poochiereds.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Layton
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 3:27 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc
[mailto:c...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:09 PM
To: Jeff Layton
Cc: Edgar Olougouna; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case
Email
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of
CIFS client timeout behavior
Below...
Jeff Layton
; MSSolve Case Email; Christopher R. Hertel;
cifs-proto...@samba.org; Edgar Olougouna; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: Re: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting
clarification of CIFS client timeout behavior
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Volker Lendecke
volker.lende
Matthias,
Thanks for your inquiry regarding the description attribute in AD. The case
number for this question is 110102774074009. One of our engineers will be in
touch with you shortly.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent:
Thanks for confirming that there is no misc parameter. I debugged this at the
server side and noticed it was down to NDR marshaling.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:16 AM
To: Edgar
Constructed Types
[MS-RPCE] Microsoft Corporation, Remote Procedure Call Protocol Extensions
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc243560.aspx
Section 2.2.5 64-Bit Network Data Representation
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4
Andrew,
I have created the case number 110081752971983 for this inquiry. One of our
engineers will take ownership of this case and will get in touch with you soon.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 12:22
Andrew,
I have created the case number 110062452298172 for this inquiry. One of my
colleagues will take ownership and will follow-up with you.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 7:22 AM
To: Interoperability
Andrew,
I am researching this issue and will update you as soon as I have news.
Thanks,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 11:02 AM
To: 'abart...@samba.org'
Cc: Bill Wesse; Matthieu Patou (mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net);
'p...@tridgell.net
Andrew,
I have created case number 110062157456375 for your inquiry regarding
msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage. One of my teammates will be in touch with
soon.
Regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 1:56 AM
Hello Matthieu,
Thanks for your request for clarification on the MS-DFSC document. I created
case number 110042518962417 for this request. One of my colleagues will take
ownership and will contact you soon.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou
Matthieu,
I have taken ownership of this case. I am researching your question and will
update you as soon I have news.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller (MBD)
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 1:54 PM
To: Matthieu Patou; Interoperability Documentation Help;
-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 12:09 PM
To: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Cc: Bill Wesse; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: Bug in MS-WINSRA section 2.2.10.1 Name Record
Stefan,
Regarding the issue you raised on replicating a name with a length of 255
Matthieu,
Thanks for your questions. I created the case 110021555999716 for this request.
One of my colleagues will contact you soon.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 3:26 PM
To:
Hi Tridge,
Thank you for this request on the MS-GSSA. One of my colleagues will take
ownership of this case 11002185893 and will be in touch with you soon.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010
: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:19 PM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: Bill Wesse; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: Bug in MS-WINSRA section 2.2.10.1 Name Record
Hi Edgar,
Could you send me which build of Windows 2008 you ran
Hi Stefan,
We completed our investigation on the Padding issue regarding the name record
in MS-WINSRA. The product team confirmed the observed behavior.
As a result, the definition of the Padding field will be updated to reflect the
following. The change will appear in a future release of the
Hi Stefan,
I am taking care of this case and will update you as soon as I have news.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Bill Wesse
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:37 AM
To: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Edgar Olougouna
Subject
the
necessary processes in place to avoid further occurrences.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:35 AM
To: Andrew Bartlett
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net; Endi Sukma Dewata
Subject: RE: Conflicting OIDs
Andrew
Andrew,
I am taking care of this and will be updating you as soon as I have news.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Bill Wesse
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:51 AM
To: Andrew Bartlett; Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org;
Metze,
Thank you for your inquiry. Please find below the answers for your questions.
1) When calling DRSGetMemberships to get the user’s group memberships,
DRSGetMemberships is not proxied by the DC of COMPUTER-DOM to a DC of USERS-DOM
in the cross-forest trust scenario you described.
Andrew,
I am looking into this and will keep you updated with my progress.
Best regards,
Edgar A. Olougouna
Sr. SEE, Microsoft DSC Protocol Team
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 4:00 PM
To: Interoperability
Hi Stefan,
We are actively working on this issue. I will update you as soon as I have news.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 2:56 AM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; 'p
Hi Stefan,
I am looking into this and will update you on my progress.
Best regards,
Edgar A. Olougouna
Sr. SEE, Microsoft DSC Protocol Team
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:47 AM
To: Interoperability
Hi Zachary,
I will be investigating this case and will update you as soon as I have news.
Best regards,
Edgar A. Olougouna
Sr. SEE, Microsoft DSC Protocol Team
-Original Message-
From: Zachary Loafman [mailto:zachary.loaf...@isilon.com]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 11:18 AM
To:
Hi Nadezhda,
This response relates to the portion of your inquiry regarding the
CreateSecurityDescriptor algorithm. I hope the following information will
clarify how CreatorDescriptor and defaultSecuritiDescriptor relate to the
CreateSecurityDescriptor procedure.
The CreatorDescriptor
[mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 3:22 AM
To: Edgar Olougouna
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7
Hi Edgar,
While investigating your inquiry, we would like to request more data to help
fully scope the issues
65537 with offset 65536) to see whether the file length becomes 131072
after the second write fails.
Best regards,
Edgar A. Olougouna
Sr. SEE, Microsoft DSC Protocol Team
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 11:08 AM
To: Stefan (metze
open specification specific documentation issue, and we
will be happy to assist.
Best regards,
Edgar A. Olougouna
Sr. SEE, Microsoft DSC Protocol Team
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 10:17 AM
To: 'tri...@samba.org'
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; p
Hi Ronnie,
I have completed my research on your questions regarding the [MS-GPEF]
document. As we agreed, I will then proceed and close the case.
This is a summary of the answers.
Document MS-GPEF section 2.2.1.2.1
The efsblob starts
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
