Hi all,
Do you guys have any good recommendation of any Cisco
Conference/Seminar/Course conducted by Cisco other than Networkers? Please
recommend. Thanks.
Regards,
Cheeyong
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26087t=26087
This comes up once every quarter or so. I need Cat5000 sup1 16mb ram, but I
have an older hardware revision Sup, so need this special MEM-C5K-16M-CUSTOM
part number apparently only available from Cisco. But, I remember reading in
this list a long time ago that just need and your fine except
Paul,
November 1st it started to happen.
Thanks for looking into this.
Brandon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul Borghese
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Duplicate Emails?? [7:25902]
Ok,
Ask yourself this question
What is always implicit to any access list even though it it is not seen
when the access list is displayed ?
When you have the answer you will know why you cannot apply that ACL
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26090t=26024
All,
I have a question that may have several answers, I have tried a few with
varying results and would just like to see if anyone else has any
suggestions. We run a Large Telco Data Backbone, most of which has been run
on OSPF and BGP. Our distribution and access layers contain layer three
You know the funny thing about cisco is that they dont make a thing, they
just farm it out and repackage it. This will hold true for the memory as
well, pop out the memory module and take a close look, it should be just PC
memory, either 72 pin edo ram or 128 pin sdram. Sad but true Cisco makes a
Rubbish, the IP addressing, IPX addressing is already done, names are done,
passwords are done, you jump right into complex configuration and you better
be qucik becasue at the moment cisco want to see how fast you are rather
than how good you are, for me the two day ccie's are far better
Hello Group,
We have a AS5300 (for dialup clients) to which several E1's have been
plugged.
Can any one of you tell me how to get SNMP based (or any other way)
statistics so that USAGE of the E1's can be seperately monitored over a
period of time.
Thanking in advance,
Vajira
Message Posted
Chaps,
i have been reading part two of howard ospf guide and i think i am missing
the point on a couple of things and i would apprecite any help you guys
could give..
1)Summarization
one config says this
int e0 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0
int e2 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
network 172.17.0.1
hi , anyone
knows if Linux Client by Cisco for VPN concentrator
3005 supports Internet sharing .
What I mean is if a Linux server dialups to the VPN
3005 server . Can it be installed for internet sharing
for the rest of the Linux clients?
regards,
suaveguru
Search for a program called MRTG
It is free, requires configuration, but is an excellent tool for
rendering graphs of usage, as well as lots of other features and add
ins.
I use it to moitor (amongst others) the modem usage on our AS5300.
Cheers,
Symon
---
Hello Group,
We
Cisco Press and Exam Cram's. These subjects will be hard to tackle if you
do not have above the CCNA understanding going into your studies. For this
reason, use the Cisco Press as your guide (it's were the exam comes from).
All the best !!!
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Juan Blanco
I found the Lammle CCNP routing book to be easy to learn, but lacking
in some major areas for the exam.
Symon
---
Cisco Press and Exam Cram's. These subjects will be hard to tackle
if you
do not have above the CCNA understanding going into your studies.
For this
reason, use
We have a 6500 with dual SUP-1A's with each having MSFC.
The MSFC's are configured in redundant mode.
Thus the configuration can be changed on only one of the MSFC's.
There is a unique problem being faced with such a config.
The vty 0 4 configuration is as follows:
line vty 0 4
session-timeout
How can they be better? People taking the one day are taking the same exact
test as the ones who had the two day. One day people just skip the time
consuming basic stuff.
DAve Diaz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Rubbish, the IP addressing, IPX addressing is
Unfortunately not so in this case. There is documented problems with Sup I
with hardware 1.6 or earlier. The cheap Kingston and standard third party
options for Sup I don't work. I have found one place that sells the official
version quite cheap though just today on the net, but looking for 3rd
Please tell me one of the messages that was duplicated.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Brandon Peyton
To: Paul Borghese ;
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:33 AM
Subject: RE: Duplicate Emails?? [7:25902]
Paul,
November 1st it started to happen.
Thanks for looking into this.
also to add, for those that get 29xx series switches, a 2926T (or F) is
SupII bsaed, and a 2901 is SupI based. One of the key advantages of a
SupII is the ability to do Fast Ethernet Channel.
I would argue, that even for CCIE lab preperation, a Sup I is sufficient.
Sure, you may not be able to
write erase
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Richard Johnson wrote:
[ The following text is in the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the US-ASCII character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
How do I reset a 2600 router so it looks as if it came out
Hi Larry,
I'm not familiar with the PIX tool, but have worked
with ConfigMaker a few times.
I do tech-support so see installs rolled out with
config-maker configs sometimes, and most of them have
some issue. Something was left out, or something
wasn't quite right, etc.
If they need/want to
Hai,
I agred with you :)
This is a Cisco Networking Forum and should stay that ways.
New people here may stay away just because of this type of arguments.
Thanks
Nuurul Basar Bin Mohd Baki
Senior Customer Engineer
CCNA, MCP
--
From: Marshal Schoener[SMTP:[EMAIL
Take this URL to get MRTG.
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/
Be sure to send Tobias a postcard. :)
-Original Message-
From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 05:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: E1 usage monitoring on AS5300
Sometime ago, (6 months I think) someone came up with a link to download HP
Openview trial version. Being a good network engineer, I download it to my
check it out later file. Well, later is here now. Where is downloaded it
to is gone! (My mind is with it I think)So would someone point me
Marcus,
Will you share your 'offical version' contact with us? Did you manage to
find a 3rd party or cheaper version?
Thanks,
Lance
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26109t=26088
--
FAQ, list archives, and
I think this is what you're looking for:
http://www.openview.hp.com/products/nnm/seetrybuy/index.asp
John
William Harrison 11/13/01 7:42:45 AM
Sometime ago, (6 months I think) someone came up with a link to
download HP
Openview trial version. Being a good network engineer, I download it
Very good, I didn't made it :-(
My score was 748, I passed all my CCNP exam without any problems, seems to
me that I missing something in my study materials (I've got the CID book
from ciscopress), any suggestions for reading / links ?
Tom
Message Posted at:
No, I usually only feel stupid when I do something really idiotic. Like for
example by making a complete ass out of myself by making completely
erroneous statements on mailing lists, being obnoxious in the process and
then pretending that it was all just a ploy when someone points out how
The only problem with this link, is you don't get all
the bells and whistles with it, like all the help
files, all the icons, etc.
If your not concerned with that, that link is good.
Debbie Westall
--- John Neiberger
wrote:
I think this is what you're looking for:
Sorry I forgot to mention that, if you want the full
demo version, contact HP via the Customer Service
Section and request they send you a copy by CD-ROM. I
received mine in about 4 days.
The only problem with this link, is you don't get all
the bells and whistles with it, like all the help
What book Caslow ?? (Cisco Certification Bridges, Routers, and Switches
)
1ra edition or second edition
JNC
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26118t=26118
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I know I have 90 min.
How many questions are there? What is them passing score?
thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26117t=26117
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Is it still true that Cisco does not support AAA accounting under Radius? I
have set up a radius server and one of my routers to authenticate to it.
This works fine, however, there are no accounting records being sent from
the router I have configured
aaa accounting commands 0 use-radius
Hire, Ejay wrote:
You can also force it to write the config to a tftp server via snmp.
I have no doubt this is true but have never tried it. Would you care to
share how this
is done?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26120t=25969
was ccbootcamp study guide helpful.
Todd Carswell wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
Just wanted to chime in with my celebratory remarks. I passed the CCIE
RS
written today.
I used some of the usual complement of books that I've seen recommended
here:
I passed the CID exam the first time I took it, but I passed with
exactly the passing score (talk about close!) If you're weak on SNA
(which I am) then you may want to just snoop around cisco.com a little.
A search on SNA will turn up some decent reading material, and that's
all I used to sit for
You do not have to use contiguos ports. For example, I want to create a GEC
with ports 2/1-3 and 5/1-3. The command would be set port channel
2/1-3,5/1-3 on. Hope this helps!
-junovtv
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26123t=26077
I have been doing accounting from my routers to a Ciscosecure ACS Radius
server for some time now. So I know that you can do it.
Richard Newman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Is it still true that Cisco does not support AAA accounting under Radius?
I
have
I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with the 2 port multi
channel T3 port adapter for the 7xxx series routers. I have heard from some
people that they are good and some that they are very buggy. I have one
that I would like to put in production but before I do I wanted to see if
Yes, the ccbootcamp RS written workbook was my central piece of study
material. I used Caslow, Doyle, and a few white papers here and there to
fill in the gaps.
While the workbook did not go into the various topics in depth (I don't
think that's what it was written for), the questions provided
I am sure then that I am missing some configuration parm then. I have
several routers running IOS 11.2, 12.0 and 12.2. The router in question is
running IOS 12.0(19). Here is my router config at the end. I know that my
radius server (FreeRadius v0.3) is accepting accounting infomation because
in
what is Test Center more recommended
1.- Global Knowledge Network or
2.- ccbootcamp.com (c) 2001 Network Learning, Inc.
Is there any recommend ??
Joselito
CCNA,CCNP,candidate CCIE
Daniel Cotts wrote:
Second is better.
-Original Message-
From: Joselito Nuqez [mailto:[EMAIL
I wouldn't create 2 etherchannels between the switches, as this creates a
loop, and with STP enabled, one of the channels would be disabled. Use all
4 ports, or 2 of the ports; one from each supervisor engine. The commands
to accomplish this would be as follows:
set port chan 1/1,2/1 on (2
You're obviously a trainer! I am too.
The CRC is handled by the NIC, not the OS of the computer. Just a nit-picky
thing. However, I also have to object to the main message that you are
giving. I think it's very important to mention that it is rare that B1 (a
bridge or router) would
I am interested to know how many people use NetWare Core Protocol (NCP)
over TCP. Like Howard, I didn't think this was the normal way of handling a
migration from IPX to IP, although it certainly makes sense.
So, a survey: can people on the list let us know if they use this?
Note: I'm not
Juan Blanco wrote:
Jimmy
You may want to get a copy of SecureCRT, most people that I know that works
with Cisco equipment every day use it
My 2 cents
JB
Agreed.
SecureCRT is a superior product. But it's not freeware as is Teraterm.
Message Posted at:
first edition, corrections, and new topics. If anyone wants a worn,
marked copy of the first edition they can have it for the cost of
shipping.
Fred.
Joselito Nuqez wrote:
What book Caslow ?? (Cisco Certification Bridges, Routers, and Switches
)
1ra edition or second edition
JNC
Fred,
I would love to have it. Could you email me. I'm study for CCIE and could
use a marked up copy
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fred
Ingham
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That was it Thanks Bill
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
image001.jpg]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26135t=26135
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Hello,
We've got 3660 at central office and PIX at satellite
ofices to do IPSec VPN. Sometimes PIX couldn't connect
3660 and I have to reboot 3660 to make it work. I'm
wondering if there is a easy way, say clear the
connection, so I don't have to reboot the 3660?
Thanks in advance.
Jim
Finally something I know a little bit about. NWIP is dead (thank the Novell
gods). NCP runs natively over TCP now. When installing a Netware 5.1
server TCP/IP is now the default protocol. If you want to migrate from IPX
to IP you do it by having a NetWare 5.x server serving as a IPX/IP
I have that card on my 7206. I have had no problems. But except for one
little thing. It seems that that when ever the router is re-booted, it seem
to put the second interface into a line loop, at least on the led indicator
(orange). Simply doing a shut, no shut turns off the line loop led
Hi Jim,
Sounds like you're using an older IOS with flaky IPSEC code. Try upgrading
to one of the 12.2 releases. Solves a lot of IPSEC issues. May also need a
policy route map on the router side (internal interface) to set the DF bit
to 0 (don't fragment). Will solve MTU issues with IPSEC
In our case, we followed the setup championed in various novell TIDs.
It was fairly easy to assess the outcome of the stereotypical trade-off in
this case.
1. when we attempted to browse an nds tree via slp and access files via
ncp/tcp, it was many times faster than similar activities performed
Joselito,
I attended ccbootcamp.com#8217;s class last week. I can't say enough about
how great the class was! Before attending the class, I didn#8217;t feel
good about my chances, but now that I have been through their class, I think
I have a shot at passing. Each day was intense, and
After turning on debug radius I get the following error when the router
attempts to send accounting information:
RADIUS: unsupported accounting type 3 for user xx
So does this mean I have a configuration problem in my users file for my
radius server?
-Richard
Message Posted at:
A customer of mine is preparing for a conversion from Netware IPX to IP
only. Total network is 350+ servers. 98% are Netware 5.1. On Netware 5.1,
when 2 servers can communicate through IP they will use IP for all
communications.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Joselito,
I attended ccbootcamp.com?s class last week. I can't say enough about how
great the class was! Before attending the class, I didn?t feel good about my
chances, but now that I have been through their class, I think I have a shot
at passing. Each day was intense, and consisted of
Interested in feedback on using BGP as a Disaster Recovery and/or Load
Balancing solution:
BACKGROUND
Currently, we have one production datacenter (COLO) (DC1) with 2 100MB feeds
to redundant 7200s, 2 ip class C blocks (say 1.1.1.x and 2.2.2.x) one behind
each 7200. this is a Cisco failover
The non-designated port in the channel would still forward traffic.
Brant Stevens wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I wouldn't create 2 etherchannels between the switches, as this creates a
loop, and with STP enabled, one of the channels would be disabled. Use
we are using vpn client (3.0.6 rel 2 and 3.1.1) to connect to vpn 3000
concentrator with RSA ACE server 5.0 authenticating the connections. put
windows 98 in the mix and there tends to be problems.
#1 problem - VPN Subsystem unavailable - cannot make IPSec Connection
#2 problem - VPN client
A straight T1 clear channel line can get expensive depending on the
distance, plus that makes it an OPX (off premise exteansion) line. You
should use EM for the tie line between two routers, then some sort of WAN
circuit to bring the two together. You can do anything such as FXS to FXO,
etc,.
Good old-fashioned re-addressing. Once you re-address, summarize at the
abr's.
Mark Paterson wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
All,
I have a question that may have several answers, I have tried a few with
varying results and would just like to see if anyone
This is the forum for asking wiring questions. Any CCIE worth his/her salt
will know the physical layer of networking.
Now for your question, that will be fine for 10/100. But don't skimp out on
price and just get the 1,2,3,6 wires. I'd get all 8 pairs in the wiring
because GigE uses all the
I am going in to test tomorrow, but I need some information on:
Executive Summary
Design Requirements
Design Solutions
A couple of words on each would be cool as ice.
Hopefully someone will get back to me in time for me to read your brief.
Thanks
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Please
Can't re-address, these a public routable addresses, remember this is a
Telco Service provider, If it where that easy we would have done it that
way, this network also makes an enterprise look small by comparison. You
need to really think about this one.
Message Posted at:
You have to readdress. ATT does it, so can you. I never said it was going
to be fun.
Mark Paterson wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can't re-address, these a public routable addresses, remember this is a
Telco Service provider, If it where that easy we would
Depends on who is doing the routing. A PBX is capable of doing all it's own
dial-plans, or you can give the call-routing decision making to a cisco
router and have it do it, which also makes it way more configurable. You
really don't even need a router to tie two PBX's together if you want,
You are indeed correct. Posting questions here is a way of finding
information on the internet. It's the lazy persons way! Why take an hour
or two to look something up on your own when you can post a question here in
one minute and have someone else provide the answer?
The ability to research
James
Don't take this the wrong way but if you are worried about whether the
configs are on the router or not, save your money.
A little advice learn every command;
go to CCO and pull up the IOS command and config guides and have at it.
Start with getting the data-link going then move on to
I want to thank everyone for the prompt and courteous answers. I really
apprecaite the you insights and thoughts.
Take Care,
LJ
Larry Johnson wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have client that will not take no for answer.
He feels that the using ConfigMaker
DID is the public address of voice, but you may still need to map over DID
numbers to your internal extensions. Otherwise you need an auto-attendant
that asks you to enter the extension of the person you are trying to reach,
which could be considered the NAT of voice, since you need a box to
Just so I can learn, how do you load-balance between static routes? Does
the routers just handle static routes in a round-robbin fashion?
MADMAN wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Simple, get rid of BGP, you have two connections but your not dual
homed so BGP is not buying you
Here on the contract front I'm still getting 56/hr W-2. Contract gigs are
tight, but available for the taking.
--
Best Regards,
Chris Watson, CCNP
Jason wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think it is more because they want to push the salary down, so if they
advertise lower
Use IBGP for customer routes and OSPF only for reachability (loopbacks
and links between routers).
Your primary concern with OSPF at that point will be the
number of routers in a given area and link instability. If
you have enough routers that summarization is still reqired.
it is much easier
Repost, my first line didn't make it.
Go with the second edition. It contains everything in the
first edition, corrections, and new topics.
Fred.
Joselito Nuqez wrote:
What book Caslow ?? (Cisco Certification Bridges, Routers, and Switches
)
1ra edition or second edition
JNC
Why go away from EIGRP? Are you putting in No'tell or something? (WARNING! 2
cents: If aint broke.)
It seems that you may be able to place some those discontiguous nets into
some stub or NSSA's. My gut thought is to limit the core router and one
interface hop as part of Area 0 and then
CCNP Study guides were dead on.
--
Best Regards,
Chris Watson, CCNP
Mitchell Hershkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I just passed my CCNA exam and now plan to study for my CCNP
certification.
I used Sybex/Lammle to study for CCNA and found it to be an
I would like to know what is the Passing score on the Written Exam. On
CramSession it says that it ranges between 65% and 75%.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26164t=26164
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
I was browsing the Open Forum on CCO and came across this gem in a reply to
a query on CRC errors. I think someone's been working in sales for too
long, or else just used an acronym decoder without applying any thought.
Input errors are the numbers of CRC errors and framing errors. A CRC is a
In a message dated 11/13/01 4:57:36 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subj: Re: OSPF aggreation question [7:26091]
Date: 11/13/01 4:57:36 PM Central Standard Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Paterson)
Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark
Yes and no...
If you plan to announce addresses from DC1 (provider 1) through
DC2 (provider 2) in the case of a failure/loss of DC1 you could
run into reachability issues. Some providers filter on allocation
boundries so the /24 announcements will probably not be globally
reachable. How severly
Further more, you assume that I don't have a permit any ACL already to go.
This ACL is also denied.
- Sean
Matthew Crane wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ask yourself this question
What is always implicit to any access list even though it it is not seen
when
Instead of the Zen moment, could you just help me out?
Matthew Crane wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ask yourself this question
What is always implicit to any access list even though it it is not seen
when the access list is displayed ?
When you have the
DOH! That ACL is *already in place.* Might time for me to go home.
Sean Knox wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Further more, you assume that I don't have a permit any ACL already to go.
This ACL is also denied.
- Sean
Matthew Crane wrote in message
[EMAIL
Priscilla,
Comments inserted below. Since, I'm using stupid MS outlook, my comments are
marked with a at the start of the paragraph only (which I had to manually
type!).
WAYNE BAETY, MCSE, A1C, USAF
Network Systems Trainer
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL
Exaclty 70%. There are different sections just like all the rest of Cisco
exams and your score is tallied on how well you did on each section. From
the way I understand it , different quiestions are wieghted differently.
Like some may be worth more than others. My favorite book was the CCIE prep
Hi everyone.
I'm using a 2900 Catalyst and embarassingly enough, I cannot fully block
myself from port 80. My ACL does block me from accessing the switch's Web
interface, but I still surf the net.
I'm on port F0/2 and my router is on F0/9. All ports are on the default
VLAN.
Any help
Don't hold your breath.:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kent Hundley
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Internet Routing Architectures 1st or 2nd edition?
[7:26067]
He won't be as suprised as
I was told that the second ed is the one to get. Want to buy my 1st ed.?:))
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Joselito Nuqez
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What book Caslow [7:26118]
What book
You need to add
IP ACCESS-GROUP 101 OUT
also to block outgoing WWW requests.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACLs Applied to VLANs [7:26175]
Hi everyone.
I'm using a 2900
VLAN access-groups act differently than routers, try switvhing it to an out
ACL instead.
MikeM
- Original Message -
From: Andrew L
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:59 PM
Subject: ACLs Applied to VLANs [7:26175]
Hi everyone.
I'm using a 2900 Catalyst and embarassingly
Anyone mess with this feature... recommendations?
Thanks,
Jeff
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26180t=26180
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
Excellent suggestion, That is our end goal. And considering we are running a
number of 12012's that can handle lots of peering sessions, BPG would be an
excellent solution. However if you had smaller routers at the core, say
7500's could this still work. The network has 200 access routers, that
Andrew L wrote:
Hi everyone.
I'm using a 2900 Catalyst and embarassingly enough, I cannot fully block
myself from port 80. My ACL does block me from accessing the switch's Web
interface, but I still surf the net.
I'm on port F0/2 and my router is on F0/9. All ports are on the
Your a funny guy :-) come on are you not going for your CCIE, There is a way
of doing this with out BGP or Re numbering.
Mark
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26183t=26091
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Actually that is not a Demo version, but full NNM CD, just without license
it will run for 90 days.
Alex
Debbie Westall wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sorry I forgot to mention that, if you want the full
demo version, contact HP via the Customer Service
Section
RCL wrote:
I am going in to test tomorrow, but I need some information on:
Executive Summary
Design Requirements
Design Solutions
A couple of words on each would be cool as ice.
Hopefully someone will get back to me in time for me to read your brief.
Thanks
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
I've never seen that error before.
Perhaps you could post the entire output from debug radius and debug aaa
accounting, while some user is trying to input commands.
Richard Newman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
After turning on debug radius I get the
I have worked with it on 5500's. Customer is a large Novell shop and would
periodically have some interesting broadcast storms. Usually a print server
and a tech's PC would get into some kind of argument. Works good. I set
the limits ~20%-30%. Low enough to stop any device from getting to
Hello Group,
We have a small ISP which gives few 128k Leased lines (ppp
configuration) from a Cisco 3640 router. This same router also the
gateway to the international pipeline.
Our requirement is to RESTRICT the international line usage by the
Leased line customers.
Preferably we look at
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
