Hi guys,
there is something I can't quite figure out with BGP.
Let a bi-homed AS with only two BGP speakers (each of them has one eBGP
session with a different upstream, they speak iBGP together).
Router 1 receives 238k routes from provider A; so does router 2 from
provider B.
When looking
Great. Helped a lot.
Thanks.
-Mensagem original-
De: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2008 04:03
Para: Leonardo Gama Souza; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Assunto: RE: [c-nsp] Key-chain and MD5 authentication for IS-IS
Leonardo
hi...what is the different between fastEthernet3/0/0
with fastEthernet0/3. is it same.??im still confuse..
looking forward to hear from u..thanks
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with
A simple google search will get you back with millions :) below mentioned
link is one of them
http://www.petri.co.il/csc_how_router_interfaces_get_their_names_on_cisco_ro
uters.htm
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi,
I've got a 2811 that crashed with a bus error within a few hours of enabling
Netflow export. I haven't opened a TAC case yet, but my curiousity was aroused
by the address at which the error occured 0xDEADBEF3. This could almost
be pronounced Dead Beef
System returned to ROM
Any particular reason you're running a 12.4T version? We've got a 2821
running 12.4(16a) doing netflow export, been rock-solid for months.
Chuck Church
Principal Network Engineer, CCIE #8776
Harris Information Technology Services
EDS Contractor - Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI)
1210 N. Parker
On Thu, January 24, 2008 1:29 pm, Brad Beck wrote:
I've got a 2811 that crashed with a bus error within a few hours of
enabling Netflow export. I haven't opened a TAC case yet, but my
curiousity was aroused by the address at which the error occured
0xDEADBEF3. This could almost be
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 14:04 +, Tim Franklin wrote:
Yes - traditionally it's 0xDEADBEEF, I guess Cisco felt the need to
distinguish between different sides of beef and so dropped an 'E' to add
an index number :)
Seriously, it's an old coder utility / humour combo - if there's memory
On Thu, January 24, 2008 2:12 pm, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Why DEADBEEF and not some other 'magic' number is up there with why you
find so many workstations of long-time coders with the MAC of their
Ethernet card re-programmed to be nn:nn:nn:C0:FF:FE...
Maybe even with two Es in the end, like
No, doesn't seem to be. I tried lowering the MTU on the client, nothing
different.
2008/1/23, Frank Bulk - iNAME [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anything to do with packet size?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristofer
Sigurdsson
Thanks very much for the example Robert!
Do you know if m23 framing on the T3 is a standard with channelized DS3's? I
use a number of ATM DS3's and we use c-bit framing there.
Thanks,
-Nick Voth
From: Robert Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:02:47 -0500
To: Nick Voth [EMAIL
I don't think I've ever worked on a Novell network that didn't have
DEADBEEF as an internal network server address in use. Probably added a
few myself... :)
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Franklin
Sent: Thursday, January 24,
2008/1/22, David Freedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I dont see your crypto isakmp nat-keepalive statement.
Good point. I just added that, setting it to 20 seconds, but unfortunately,
the situation did not change. Thanks, though.
-Kristo
___
cisco-nsp
Once upon a time, Nick Voth [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Thanks very much for the example Robert!
Do you know if m23 framing on the T3 is a standard with channelized DS3's? I
use a number of ATM DS3's and we use c-bit framing there.
I've got CT3s that are m23 and CT3s that are cbit.
IIRC,
Hello Future CCDEs,
I have a router with dual WAN and one of them is in a VRF-lite, nothing
there but another default route.
I would like to be able to utilize that default route once the primary WAN
is down.
I have ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 SecondaryWAN 250.
When the primary interface down, i can
At 09:56 AM 1/24/2008, you wrote:
Thanks very much for the example Robert!
Do you know if m23 framing on the T3 is a standard with channelized DS3's? I
use a number of ATM DS3's and we use c-bit framing there.
You're welcome. Today, C-bit is typically used when you have a point
to point
On Thu, January 24, 2008 3:20 pm, Luan Nguyen wrote:
I have a router with dual WAN and one of them is in a VRF-lite, nothing
there but another default route.
I would like to be able to utilize that default route once the primary WAN
is down.
If there's *nothing* in it but a default route,
We were using Marconi in our previous company and it worked fine...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
Sent: 23 January 2008 21:54
To: Mad Unix
Cc: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MUX
Hi Mad,
CWDM is a nice and (relatively)
I am doing 2 dmvpn tunnels. One using the primary, one using the vrf. They
both terminate into the same hub router.
NAT config:
ip nat inside source route-map NAT_SEC_WAN interface FastEthernet0/0
overload
route-map NAT_SEC_WAN permit 10
match ip address PAT_ACL_1
match interface
Hello,
We like to understand how multicast is handled with Cisco 3560G in a
very special case : when we don't enable multicast routing in the device.
Problem is :
- we have more than 100 machines in a /25 that does multicast using
pim sparse-dense mode.
- we have several 3560G with 2 (maybe
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Nick Voth wrote:
Thanks very much for the example Robert!
Do you know if m23 framing on the T3 is a standard with channelized DS3's? I
use a number of ATM DS3's and we use c-bit framing there.
c-bit framing is normally used for clear-channel DS3s.
m13/m23 framing is
Hi
I have purchsed 1841 with same wic module .Is this below config work for point
to point T1 connection.
interface Serial0/0
ip address
service-module t1 framing esf
service-module t1 linecode b8zs
service-module t1 timeslots 1-12 speed 64
Regards
Gagandeep
Jay
All,
Can anyone tell me what the config command to peg an interface as up
even though its line down?
I seem to recall seeing this just days ago.
Thanks,
Joe
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
no keepalive ?
- Jared
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 01:44:37PM -0500, Joe Maimon wrote:
All,
Can anyone tell me what the config command to peg an interface as up
even though its line down?
I seem to recall seeing this just days ago.
Thanks,
Joe
No keepalive.
Juliano Luz
Analista de Redes e Telecomunicações
Infra-Estrutura de Redes e Telecomunicações
Telemática - Confederação SICREDI - Porto Alegre
+55 (51) 3358-7113
http://www.sicredi.com.br
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Joe
just do a no keepalive :)
-lmn
On Jan 24, 2008 1:44 PM, Joe Maimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Can anyone tell me what the config command to peg an interface as up
even though its line down?
I seem to recall seeing this just days ago.
Thanks,
Joe
yes. so unintuitive.
Luan Nguyen wrote:
just do a no keepalive :)
-lmn
On Jan 24, 2008 1:44 PM, Joe Maimon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Can anyone tell me what the config command to peg an interface as up
even though its line down?
I
From: Robert Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:46:25 -0500
To: Nick Voth [EMAIL PROTECTED], cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PA-MC-T3 and T1 config questions
At 09:56 AM 1/24/2008, you wrote:
Thanks very much for the example Robert!
Joe Maimon wrote:
yes. so unintuitive.
Hey, it beats unkeepalive all :-)
Jeff
Luan Nguyen wrote:
just do a no keepalive :)
-lmn
On Jan 24, 2008 1:44 PM, Joe Maimon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Can anyone tell me what the config command to
Hey, it beats unkeepalive all :-)
service enable undead?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
I am opening a new office and have a 1.5 Meg DSL circuit being dropped to
the C.O. from ATT with a few static IP's. I would like to use the Cisco
1801 W instead of the ATT modem as it offers me al the features I want, but
I am no DSL expert. I understand the 1801 has a DSL modem built in.
I don't recommend this to my clients. If you keep the ATT modem in
there then you can unplug the router so you can troubleshoot the DSL
circuit. It will make your life easier when dealing with ATT tech
support. Just insist on a modem with no routing.
Roy
Richard Golodner wrote:
I am
I am opening a new office and have a 1.5 Meg DSL circuit being
dropped to the C.O. from ATT with a few static IP's. I would like to use
the Cisco 1801 W instead of the ATT modem as it offers me al the features I
want, but I am no DSL expert. I understand the 1801 has a DSL modem built
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Richard Golodner wrote:
I am opening a new office and have a 1.5 Meg DSL circuit being dropped to
the C.O. from ATT with a few static IP's. I would like to use the Cisco
1801 W instead of the ATT modem as it offers me al the features I want, but
I am no DSL expert. I
[...] I imagine I will need the VPI /VCI, but what
other information would be needed?
You can ask them about the VPI/VCI and they may know but it's usually
0/35. Other than that there's lots of example configs out there on how to
configure Cisco stuff with dsl.
I'll throw a positive vote for
gagandeep singh wrote:
Hi
I have purchsed 1841 with same wic module .Is this below config work for
point to point T1 connection.
interface Serial0/0
ip address
service-module t1 framing esf
service-module t1 linecode b8zs
service-module t1 timeslots 1-12 speed 64
Only if
Here is a great tool from Cisco that goes through a little bit of a
wizard and asks the required information and then generates the
configuration, not to mention the SDM application on those little ISR's
is pretty neato and makes it easy to configure DSL connections, probably
easier then some of
there is something I can't quite figure out with BGP.
Let a bi-homed AS with only two BGP speakers (each of them has one
eBGP
session with a different upstream, they speak iBGP together).
Router 1 receives 238k routes from provider A; so does router 2 from
provider B.
When looking at
I've got a 2811 that crashed with a bus error within a few hours of
enabling Netflow export. I haven't opened a TAC case yet, but my
curiousity was aroused by the address at which the error occured
0xDEADBEF3. This could almost be pronounced Dead Beef
Yes - traditionally it's
Welcome to BGP.
A BGP speaker is only going to advertise its best external paths via
iBGP. If it has selected your other BGP speaker as its best path, it
will not (currently) advertise the externals that are not the best path.
If you examine your BGP RIB closely, you should be able
Hi,
Any suggestion will be very appreciated.
Here's the scheme :
Ports aggregation with trunking was success between Juniper - Cisco
Catalyst, but i'm having problem with the load that is not balanced on
each port.
It might be the config still missing one line somewhere :)
- a. rahman isnaini
On Jan 24, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:
In your opinion, is there any downside to this behavior
operationally (other than the time it takes for a unadvertised
route to present itself in the event the advertised route is
withdrawn?)?
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the
Can someone explain to me something in regards to the 3845 and SDM? I have a
new 3845 and it came default with a username and password of cisco. It also
comes across saying something about using SDM to configure it. Is SDM included
with the router? Is there a bin file I have to load or do I
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Tony Li wrote:
there is something I can't quite figure out with BGP.
Let a bi-homed AS with only two BGP speakers (each of them has one
eBGP
session with a different upstream, they speak iBGP together).
Router 1 receives 238k routes from provider A; so does router 2
44 matches
Mail list logo
