Oh, it's been done...
http://www.kdvelectronics.eu/uClinux-cisco2500/uClinux-cisco2500.html
stretch
http://packetlife.net/
David Coulson wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
So, we can run Linux on the Cisco routers,
My understanding is that you run Linux on an x86 device connected to
I have 6509 acting as VTP server, and many switches configured with the
same domain name and VTP password.
Every time I configure it as client, after a while I found it became
transparent.
Any advice??
Best regards,
Mohammad Khalil
Core Network Engineer
Batelco Jordan
Office: + 962 6
Hey guys,
I have a short term project which requires me to be able to route up to 2GB
of traffic (2 * 1GB upstreams).
I am planning on using 7200-G2's for the edge NAT devices and was wondering
the best way to load balance the traffic to them.
My idea was to use a 3560G or 3750G and use equal
Hey All,
Is there a way on a 2950, 3550, 3560(G), 3750(G) to block VTP from coming in
a port - at all.
.Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, RHCE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.skeeve.org
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
eintellego - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.eintellego.net
--
I'm a groove licked love
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:48:52AM +0300, Mohammad khalil wrote:
Every time I configure it as client, after a while I found it became
transparent.
I assume that it means one of the other switches here (and not the 6509).
Most likely you have more than 64 VLANs in VTP, which is more than
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Question is, while on the Portable Product Sheets, they have a good
routing section, there is nothing that seems to tell me how much layer 3
traffic the above switches can handle.
Like most L3 switches from Cisco, they'll do it at (or close to)
1) make the port an access port
2) block 01-00-0C-CC-CC-CC (used by CDP too)
3) use transparent vtp v1 different domain
4) block vlan 1 (although actually that's not possible)
You can also use switchport nonegotiate to turn DTP off, if you're getting
vtp mismatch messages
(different vtp
One other oh surprise!!! is the fact that the NPE-Gx built-in
ports
won't do over MTU of 1500 when their speed is set to anything other
than
1000.
Yep.. that's right... set the speed to 100, and the max MTU is 1500.
Set
the speed to 1000, and the max MTU is now 9216. Same port, same
Hi,
Oh, it's been done...
http://www.kdvelectronics.eu/uClinux-cisco2500/uClinux-cisco2500.html
2500? oh. now..if there was a 2651XM port i'd be very interested(!) :-)
alan
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
The current NPE-G1 peaks at 20-25% CPU load so it can take more.
Thanks,
Hank
Hank,
You should also take into consideration the type of the NPE and its current
load, as it may become a bottle neck.
Arie
-Original Message-
From:
I have a issue involving a large amount of Cisco 3500XL switches located in a
bunch of different sites and I need to change the Vlan management interface to
a completely new subnet, new vlan, and of course a new default-gateway.
I'm looking at how to accomplish this remotely...the option of
Hi All
one of my clients has a managed Internet solution with his simple MPLS VPN
and Internet access in granted to a selected group of sites including HQ
through managed internet router hosted at his ISP but he has a bit weired
request as he needs a site to connect to the Internet using Internet
* Tom Storey:
I notice Cisco poked at Junipers ScreenOS...
Cisco has/had CatOS, and has PIX and ASA operating systems, which look
and feel completely different to IOS, so they dont neccessarily get
off the hook that easily. :-)
And the VPN Concentrators had their own software line. I
I've been working all day trying to figure this out.
I'm trying to get via snmp the free and used processor memory values of a 6506
via SNMP (same sort of things are happening on other chassis).
When getting the ciscoMemoryPoolUsed and ciscoMemoryPoolFree values, with the
.1 index (to get
No mention of the version nightmare that is IOS either. For a given
platform, there are at least 3-5 compatible branches to choose from
and no clear direction of when to choose what fork (other than
fumbling with feature navigator or opening a ticket). E.g. an ISR may
have various X flavors, T and
Hi Ken,
On Apr 20, 2008, at 7:46 PM, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
I'm trying to get via snmp the free and used processor memory
values of a 6506 via SNMP (same sort of things are happening on
other chassis).
When getting the ciscoMemoryPoolUsed and ciscoMemoryPoolFree
values, with the
TFTP copy into running-config is processed after the transfer. You
won't lock yourself out mid-edit as you would if executing the same in
CLI. I recommend a config script making just the changes you need and
'copy tftp://foo/bar run'. You may have unexpected results when
applying a full startup
Im seeing duplicate advertise-map statements showing up in SRC with NPE-G1.
neighbor 172.1.0.101 activate
neighbor 172.1.0.101 advertise-map test_inject exist-map test_up
neighbor 172.1.0.101 advertisement-interval 1
neighbor 172.1.0.101 route-map AS65002-in in
neighbor
On Monday 21 April 2008, Scott Mace wrote:
Im seeing duplicate advertise-map statements showing up
in SRC with NPE-G1.
Not sure if these are related.
The case I logged with TAC resulted in bug ID CSCso72824,
which was later superseded by bug ID CSCsj48902.
Cheers,
Mark.
signature.asc
Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote on Sunday, April 20, 2008 10:30 PM:
Hi All
one of my clients has a managed Internet solution with his simple
MPLS VPN and Internet access in granted to a selected group of sites
including HQ through managed internet router hosted at his ISP but he
has a bit weired
20 matches
Mail list logo
