On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
The current NPE-G1 peaks at 20-25% CPU load so it can take more.
Thanks,
Hank
Hank,
You should also take into consideration the type of the NPE and its current
load, as it may become a bottle neck.
Arie
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hank Nussbacher
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 17:03 PM
To: Łukasz Bromirski
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1 PPS limitations
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
For the GE ports on NPE-G1 you can expect around [EMAIL PROTECTED], for the
traffic going from/to GE port on NPE-G1 to C7200-I/O-GE it's close to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and going from/to PA-GE it's only around [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That'll depend on features, IOS train and the traffic characteristics
of course but those are the baselines for empty config with CEF and
12.1 train. 12.2S and latest 12.4(15)T rebuilds should get better
performance in the same scenario.
PA-GE to PA-GE traffic maxes out at around [EMAIL PROTECTED] with NPE-G1 and
NPE-400 - so it's not limitation of CPU engine but a bus limitation.
I need PA-GE to C7200-I/O-GE connectivity. For 1500 bytes, what is the kpps
one can expect for PA-GE to C7200-I/O-GE connectivity? IOS train is
12.4(12) but can be upgraded if we know there is better performance at a later
version.
Thanks,
Hank
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
