Hi,
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 09:41:10AM +1000, Brad Henshaw wrote:
Gert Doering wrote:
OK, I've done quite some testing, tuning to the extreme...
Queueset: 1
Queue : 1 2 3 4
--
buffers : 1 5 93
That's strange... can you show show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf ipvpn_0001 prefix,
this shows the resulting vrf BGP table (i.e. after import) which might or might
not be identical to the rd rd output (wowever it looks like you're using
the same RD on both PEs, so this might not make a difference
Ray Burkholder wrote on Friday, October 03, 2008 5:30 AM:
I have a customer with two sites. Site 1 connects to Router A. Site
2 connects to Router B. We have an internet connection on Router C.
Router A connects to Router C and Router B connects to Router C.
The customer wishes to be
Hmm, so your requirement is to limit (shape/police) the
amount of BW the customer can use towards the Internet, and
impose no limits for Site A--B traffic? If that's the case,
I guess there is no real nice (and
scalable) solution.
That is pretty much it in a nutshell.
Afterwards,
On Thu Sep 25 17:20:40 EDT 2008, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2008-09-25 22:56 +0200), Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
One funny thing is that the 6500 release note now (SXH) says:
48-port Gigabit or 10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet SFP about the
6748-SFP, where the previous (SXF) phrase was: 48-port
Hello all
We are doing etherchanel between two a Cisco catalyst 4509 switchs but load
balancing is not working On the one link we have about 700M and on the other
60M. The configured load balancing method is the default which is (src-dst-ip).
Any ideas?
Hi,
We are doing etherchanel between two a Cisco catalyst 4509 switchs but load
balancing is not working On the one link we have about 700M and on the other
60M. The configured load balancing method is the default which is
(src-dst-ip).
the method you need to use to get
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 07:15:19PM -0700, Irfan Siddiqui wrote:
I don't think this is possible on 720X you have to read it of of chassis
Indeed. We resorted to configure the chassis sticker ID as snmp-server
chassis-id manually. We found no electronic way, not up to NPE-G1.
Best regards,
FWIW - FF02::1:2 to UDP/547 is a DHCPv6 solicit (or information request) ...
And the ASA probably doesn't have relaying configured (or, atleast, doesn't
know where the server is)
HTH
/TJ
--Original Message--
From: Jay Hennigan
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I can confirm that this appears to be true of NPE-G2s as well.
David Barak
Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 07:15:19PM -0700, Irfan Siddiqui wrote:
I don't think this is possible on 720X you have to read it of of chassis
Indeed. We resorted to configure the chassis sticker ID
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:39:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
configuration of your network... eg, in this case,
if a server is on the network and all clients
is on a different network, then as far as the cisco
is aware, then all traffic in that scenario will
look the same to the load
Hello All
At work we have a network of BRAS for PPP termination, consisting of Juniper
ERX and Cisco 10k.
I was wondering what is the most efficient way to filter incoming subscriber
traffic. We would like to
verify that incoming subscriber traffic is indeed sourced from the IP that
we assigned
global (outside) 2 interface
Dan
John Ramz wrote:
OS 7
I only have 2 Public Ip addresses:
2.1.1.2: In the ROuter
2.1.1.3
I am configuring this firewall very basic:
Ethernet0: outside Ip address: 2.1.1.3
Ethernet1: inside Ip address: 192.168.254.253
global (outside) 1 2.1.1.3
nat
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 05:54:31PM +0300, Victor Lyapunov wrote:
-Creating an ACL that is common for every subscriber (same for all routers)
that allows incoming traffic
originating from the address ranges that are assigned to us. This would
create an incoming ACL with
roughly 24 entries
What is the mechanism employed by ip verify unicast? Does it create
on-the-fly an ACL for each
interface that it is applied to containg in my case just one entry that
matches the network address
of the interface? In this case in a typical BRAS terminating 16000 users
would require 16000
Thank you, guys, for sharing your knowledge. I will research about EEM applet
and will apply the solution.
alejandro wainshtok
--- On Thu, 10/2/08, Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Rodney Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NAT timeout
To: Alex Wa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Hello,
I'm looking for anyone who might have any recommendations from similar
setups they've done with H-Qos on ES20 linecards providing aggregate
shaping to remote sites made up of multiple VLANs.
Here's my scenario, looking to create H-Qos egress service policy on an
ES20G 1GE interface to
Hi,
We have an 8600 that has a 12 port DS3 card and at present we split up
various VPI's to different DS3 ports. This has been working for some time.
We just added a OC3 card to the unit and that will tie to the Qwest cloud.
When trying to build a connection between a PVC on the OC3 card to a
Hi, does anyone know if there is a way to get a Cisco switch to ignore
STP BPDUs and simply pass them through the box, apart from L2CP
tunneling? We have a scenario where we have a customer 6500
connected to an Ethernet NID device which is doing QinQ that is then
connected to a 4507
19 matches
Mail list logo
