Nathan pisze:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan wrote on Monday, October 20, 2008 10:29 AM:
In effect, I want to extend the VC coming in on one PE so that it
(L3) terminates on another PE.
you need the routed pseudowire feature, but
Hi,
We have a customer that has multiple sites all connecting back to their
router in our colo. All the T1 and multilink T1 locations work just fine.
The one site that does not seem to have NAT working correctly is the one
on a T3. Each and every site is configured the same way with their own /24
Yes, the G1 is having the same problem. I assume it has to do with the fact
that the 7200 series router is a old architecture and it was never necessary
to implement this feature when it was develeoped.
We have Dimension Data as global maintenance partner and they are not able
to take devices into
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephan Lochner) wrote:
Yes, the G1 is having the same problem.
Interesting enough, 7301 (which should be a G1 in a 1RU chassis)
doesn't seem to fail there.
Elmar.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
hi
Сергей Кремезной wrote:
Hi all!
I have some problems using flow-capture and Cisco routers 7206-VXR/NPE-G2.
Once per 2 or 3 days the proccess flow-capture dies. It disappears from
top-table
on the server, working as a collector (FreeBSD, Intel Xeon 3220 4GB 4x1000GB
1x250GB ARECA 1110).
A
Hi
how can I set up the clock / dns and virtual ip
following is my setting the clock. now it is 11:20.
but it shows 15:01
router#show clock
*15:00:16.743 UTC Wed Oct 22 2008
router#calendar set 11:20:00 22 Oct 2008
router#show clock
*15:01:38.215 UTC Wed Oct 22 2008
2/ how can I set up the
The only good NMS is the one you write yourself.
If every network was the same I'm sure we'd have a perfect NMS solution
available, but unfortunately they are not, whether it be a commercial
solution or open source, someone still has to write some glue to tie
them together, some of the things
Hi does anyone have experience with ME3400 switches. How are the performing?
What about the stability
Regards MKS
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 15:44, MKS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi does anyone have experience with ME3400 switches. How are the performing?
What about the stability
We have a dozen or so in production. So far, rock solid and no major
issues with them.
--
Marko
CCIE #18427 (SP)
My network blog:
Hi!
These are good metro switches. No main issues with them.
However, as their name imply, these are metro switches. So metro
functionalities are present (UNI/NNI port types for instance, REP resiliency
protocol), while some LAN functionalities are absent (such as VTP for
instance which is less
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Eric Kagan wrote:
Just a thought - did you try 'atm route-bridged ip' on the atm
sub-interfaces ? I just had to add this to a recent config in order for
layer 3 to work.
I took it OUT, and the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MKS
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:44 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] ME3400
Hi does anyone have experience with ME3400 switches. How are the
performing?
What about
Robert Blayzor wrote on 23/10/2008 7:37 μμ:
On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:08 PM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
btw, a 24-port ME-3400 would be a welcome addition.
You mean a 48 port?
You're right. I was referring to a 24 GE model (20 dual + 4 SFP).
--
Tassos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tassos,
We have around 200 of them and we are extremely happy with them! We use them
for all kinds of L2 services and we haven't met any major issues.
I second that as well.
What seems worrying is the fact that lately we met 2 of them with a
These are good metro switches. No main issues with them.
However, as their name imply, these are metro switches. So metro
functionalities are present (UNI/NNI port types for instance, REP resiliency
protocol), while some LAN functionalities are absent (such as VTP for
instance which is less
Agreed.
But short of that, there are alternatives..
At $employer, we're evaling (among other things) SolarWinds' Orion platform.
Seems pretty spiffy, and does all of what you need and more..
-jamie
On 10/23/08 7:42 AM, Daniel Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only good NMS is the one
Hi Adrian,
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:10 +0800, adrian kok wrote:
how can I set up the clock / dns and virtual ip
following is my setting the clock. now it is 11:20.
but it shows 15:01
router#show clock
*15:00:16.743 UTC Wed Oct 22 2008
router#calendar set 11:20:00 22 Oct 2008
I have 2 SAN boxes and several servers, in addition to the rest of the data
center's servers to plan a network upgrade for. We are currently using a 4006
w/Sup II running CatOS 8.4(11)GLX and several older 2950/3500/3550 series
switches.
All of the equipment is getting older and we are trying
That is a big help! One of our carriers has just given us 7 IPVPN lines
of speeds of either 150Mb/sec or 300Mb/sec. 6 of the lines tested
perfectly. The 7th has 4% pkt loss when doing 18K pings. The carrier
hasn't managed to find the problem for the past 3 weeks. This very well
might help
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 15:10 -0700, Chris Gauthier wrote:
I have 2 SAN boxes and several servers, in addition to the rest of the
data center's servers to plan a network upgrade for. We are currently
using a 4006 w/Sup II running CatOS 8.4(11)GLX and several older
2950/3500/3550 series
Hello Chris:
I have 2 SAN boxes and several servers, in addition to the rest of the data
center's servers to plan a network upgrade for. We are currently using a 4006
w/Sup II running CatOS 8.4(11)GLX and several older 2950/3500/3550 series
switches.
All of the equipment is getting older
21 matches
Mail list logo
