Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3550 + BGP

2008-11-02 Thread Xavier Beaudouin
Hello, Le 28 oct. 08 à 10:23, Pierfrancesco Caci a écrit : :- Nimal == Nimal David Sirimanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyone have any experience running BGP on Cisco 3550 platforms? Any idea how many BGP routes it can handle? last I tried (some 3 years ago) it died with about 7000 routes.

Re: [c-nsp] Client DHCP Server

2008-11-02 Thread Church, Charles
As you probably know, a DHCP server without some getting some help from the routers is only going to serve addresses on the network it's located on. Assuming this is on the customer prem, you're probably not going to see them at the 7500 end. Do you have a topology diagram? Any reason you can't

Re: [c-nsp] Client DHCP Server

2008-11-02 Thread Mohammed Dado
I've tried turning of the DHCP server on the wifi routers, but there's a problem in some of them that the option of turning this service off is already missed. What about using some supported features by the ISP-router to stop this DHCP requests from happening ? Best Regards, Mohammed Dado

Re: [c-nsp] Client DHCP Server

2008-11-02 Thread Church, Charles
I'm assuming your network is a LAN at the customer site, with a Wimax bridged connection back to the 7500, so the 7500 interface is the default gateway for the LAN. If so, I don't believe there is anything you can configure on the 7500 to stop DHCP clients on the LAN from obtaining addresses from

Re: [c-nsp] Client DHCP Server

2008-11-02 Thread Paul Stewart
Does the Airspan equipment not support filtering? Almost all Wimax/BBW gear I work on has filtering for PPPOE, DHCP, Netbios etc. so someone can't plugin their router backwards and create havoc... Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [c-nsp] Client DHCP Server

2008-11-02 Thread Mohammed Dado
Access NW is WiMAX. Cisco hardware at the ISP end is Cisco 7500 Series. Best Regards, Mohammed Dado Technical Support Engineer - EMEA Airspan Communications Ltd -Original Message- From: Simon Lockhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 November 2008 13:34 To: Mohammed Dado Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] Client DHCP Server

2008-11-02 Thread Mohammed Dado
Guys, Anybody faced such a case before ? Best Regards, Mohammed Dado Technical Support Engineer - EMEA Airspan Communications Ltd _ From: Mohammed Dado Sent: 30 October 2008 12:24 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Client DHCP Server Gents, I

Re: [c-nsp] Client DHCP Server

2008-11-02 Thread Simon Lockhart
On Sun Nov 02, 2008 at 11:26:10AM +, Mohammed Dado wrote: I have a customer facing a problem that his end-user WiFi router's are issuing IP addresses ! I'm under the impression that this could be stopped by the DHCP snooping binding configurations in the ISP end. Any ideas ? Before anyone

Re: [c-nsp] Client DHCP Server

2008-11-02 Thread Mohammed Dado
It does support filtering using our NMS monitoring tool. I'm investigating this as well. We've an option that helps stopping this from occurring which is discarding classifiers, this is created upon the service flow products depending on our customer network behaviour ! Best Regards,

Re: [c-nsp] Client DHCP Server

2008-11-02 Thread Mohammed Dado
Yes. The 7500 is doing bridge and a DHCP server for clients is affecting multiple customers. It's almost your second proposed scenario. Best Regards, Mohammed Dado Technical Support Engineer - EMEA Airspan Communications Ltd -Original Message- From: Church, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL

[c-nsp] QOS Revisited

2008-11-02 Thread Paul Stewart
Hi there. I'm trying to create a policy-map to be applied on a subinterface - Cisco 1841 router .. wanted to get a basic config running and then I'll expand it a bit more (separate signaling from the actual voice streams etc) class-map match-any Voice match access-group 10 ! !

Re: [c-nsp] OID to pick up Device Type of Cisco devices

2008-11-02 Thread Scott Keoseyan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there not a MIB out there that contains/displays the contents of what's in the CDP neighbor table, and is this information not in the table itself... bridge/router/ip-phone/AP/etc.,,? I thought there was a network-management tool out there

Re: [c-nsp] 7206VXR and CBWFQ

2008-11-02 Thread Networkers
What code rev is in there? Thanks, Chris On 10/20/08 3:20 AM, Brian Turnbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please don't tell that to this router policy-map llq class sipRTP priority 512 class class-default fair-queue random-detect vc-class atm CVPHDSL-VoIP

[c-nsp] L2VPN Pseudowire Redundancy

2008-11-02 Thread Gary T. Giesen
I'm not sure if this is possible, but maybe someone can give me some input on how to best achieve this. I'm labbing EoMPLS using 4x 7206 VXR. I'd like to create a fully redundant pseudowire (from the provider persective). The idea is to put two PE routers at each end of the pseudowire (with a

Re: [c-nsp] L2VPN Pseudowire Redundancy

2008-11-02 Thread Mateusz Błaszczyk
you would have to land these xconnects on VPLS instance. so add 4 more devices that would be your N-PEs with VPLS instance and your current PEs would become U-PEs connected to the rest of the MPLS cloud with 1 xconnect to the active N-PE and backup xconnect to the standby N-PE. But I am not sure

Re: [c-nsp] Lightstream Alternative

2008-11-02 Thread Mateusz Błaszczyk
If the SPA card for the 7600 could do the switching, the cat 6500 should also be able to do it. But even for the 7600 I can't find any information on atm switching. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/fslocal.html#wp1098419 -- -mat

Re: [c-nsp] L2VPN Pseudowire Redundancy

2008-11-02 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
I would suggest that you treat these 2 parallel PW's as 2 separate L2 connections. Each connection would be handed over to the end customer separately, and the customer can run STP end to end between their CE's. This way the failover between PW1 and PW2 would be based on CE-to-CE STP

Re: [c-nsp] OID to pick up Device Type of Cisco devices

2008-11-02 Thread lee . e . rian
Lincoln Dale wrote on 11/01/2008 06:46:35 PM: Karl Gaissmaier wrote: Maybe RFC1213 ipForwarding would work ipForwarding OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { forwarding(1),-- acting as a gateway not-forwarding(2)

Re: [c-nsp] OID to pick up Device Type of Cisco devices

2008-11-02 Thread lee . e . rian
Scott Keoseyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/02/2008 11:00:23 AM: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there not a MIB out there that contains/displays the contents of what's in the CDP neighbor table, and is this information not in the table itself...

Re: [c-nsp] OID to pick up Device Type of Cisco devices

2008-11-02 Thread Lincoln Dale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lincoln Dale wrote on 11/01/2008 06:46:35 PM: Karl Gaissmaier wrote: Maybe RFC1213 ipForwarding would work ipForwarding OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { forwarding(1),-- acting as a gateway

Re: [c-nsp] L2VPN Pseudowire Redundancy

2008-11-02 Thread Rakesh Hegde
How about creating two psudowires , PE1- PE3 and PE2-PE4 ? This will give you two logical point to point connections between SW1 and SW2 and at the same time take care of device (PE) failure . STP,by default, will take care of the redundancy. You may also want to use UDLD and/or PAGP or LACP to

[c-nsp] SXF15/SXF15a experiences?

2008-11-02 Thread Janet Sullivan
I'm interested in hearing about people's experiences with SXF15/15a, especially in an internet edge/full BGP route table type environment. So far I've run into one oddity with SXF15 (BGP wasn't updating the local routing table until a clear ip route *), and I'm debating whether to downgrade.

Re: [c-nsp] 7206VXR and CBWFQ

2008-11-02 Thread Brian Turnbow
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-JS-M), Version 12.2(31)SB13, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Brian From: Networkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: domenica 2 novembre 2008 18.20 To: Brian Turnbow; Victor Cappuccio Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: