Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS LSP Generation/Expiry + Database Optimization - Issue - Update!

Hi all. So this turned out to be a bug with iSPF in IS-IS. TAC have filed bug ID CSCsy75784. Although first found in 12.2(33)SRC3, this issue affects all versions of SRC, SRD, as well as a few other trains. Cheers, Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [c-nsp] 3750/3750E stack upgrade downtime?

On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:26 -0500, Tony Varriale wrote: You can reload the master without doing the whole stack. Well, that would select a new master. And this new master has to be running the same software version as the current master, otherwise it would not be able to participate in the stack

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6724-SFP SXI = high cpu usage?

Not seeing it with the DFC here and sup720-10g. 2 24 CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6724-SFP 2 Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3C #sho ver Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(33)SXI, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)

[c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

On a peering session we started getting the following: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 198.32.XXX.XX 6/7 (cease) 0 bytes This all started when we upgraded to 12.2(18)SXF16 it seems or at least the timeline matches up.. So, I've discovered that 6/7 means Connection collision

Re: [c-nsp] Monitoring External Web Server

If you want to go commercial, we use a software-as-a-service (SAAS) product called Gomez. You periodically contact your server from browser-client nodes on their backbone. You can also execute scripts from these nodes that will walk through your web-site in a pre-determined way. The pricing

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

* Paul Stewart: So, I've discovered that 6/7 means Connection collision resolution - does anyone know what that means in English? ;) In general, it means that both peers successfully established a TCP connection, and one connection was closed. This happens from time to time and does not

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

Thanks what's happening (and perhaps I should have explained this a bit better) is the session is starting to become established and then dropping. This is repeated every 30-60 seconds over and over and the BGP session never actually establishes. Take care, Paul -Original Message-

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

Paul Stewart wrote: Thanks what's happening (and perhaps I should have explained this a bit better) is the session is starting to become established and then dropping. This is repeated every 30-60 seconds over and over and the BGP session never actually establishes. Paul, Does the

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

Thank you - but what is the solution to my problem or is there one? By the sounds of it I need to change out the IOS to a new version;) -Original Message- From: Christophe Fillot [mailto:c...@utc.fr] Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:01 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] Monitoring External Web Server

Aaron, I have not delved into EEM but from what I have read about it and its support for TCL, it's entirely possible that you can: 1) Create a TCL script to test your web server with a GET or other method (see http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/

Re: [c-nsp] Monitoring External Web Server

Forgot to mention that you control everything from their web-site (hence SAAS) which makes it very easy. You could resell the service ... http://www.gomez.com/ Joe Loiacono/CIV/c...@csc Sent by: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 04/03/2009 10:14 AM To Aaron Riemer arie...@wesenergy.com.au

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

Paul Stewart wrote: Thank you - but what is the solution to my problem or is there one? By the sounds of it I need to change out the IOS to a new version;) In theory this should resolve automatically, but it is abnormal if your session never establishes. If this began to happen with

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

Paul Stewart wrote: Hi, On a peering session we started getting the following: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 198.32.XXX.XX 6/7 (cease) 0 bytes This all started when we upgraded to 12.2(18)SXF16 it seems or at least the timeline matches up.. So, I've discovered that

[c-nsp] Too dumb for SLB on ASR1Ks?

Maybe someone can point me to a document that helps me through - or Rodney cuts in and tells me it's a bug ;) I have the following pretty simple (stripped down) configuration which does work on a 7201 and does not work on the ASR1000... (Yes, on the ASR the interface has 0/0/0 instead of 0/0

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

Thank you - unfortunately I do not know about the equipment on the other side but it was working perfectly up til the IOS release. This release also seems to have reintroduced the ttl-security bug that was happening a couple of releases back...;( The folks on the other side of the link tell me

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

Have you checked the capabilities being negotiated with that peer to see if anything new was negotiated up after the change? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 09:02

[c-nsp] same-router tunnel loopback

Using a same-router tunnel loopback to move traffic between global and vrf on a SUP720: rtr-1#sh run int tun254 Building configuration... Current configuration : 251 bytes ! interface Tunnel254 vrf forwarding v101 ip address 10.1.0.254 255.255.255.254 ip mtu 1500 ipv6 address

Re: [c-nsp] Monitoring External Web Server

I would strongly recommend keynote over gomez. It's what a lot of folks use. Gomez has some interesting features, but I found them harder to work with. Pingdom is also a popular choice. Or you could just use nagios or other monitoring tools do you have any sort of network

[c-nsp] Emulating the L2 aspect of VPLS with VRF-lite

Sorry for the length. I have another Friday mind-bender. We're going into an agreement with a new customer to replace their existing shared radio infrastructure with several bonded PtP DS1s at a number of sites and a DS3 at a main site. The owner of the radios infrastructure currently

Re: [c-nsp] Too dumb for SLB on ASR1Ks?

What part exactly doesn't work? just the load balancing? do you have IP connectivity ok to your real servers? how is that virtual IP being sent to the box? it's not listed anywhere in your configuration on how 10.10.237.x gets to the box. On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Elmar K. Bins

[c-nsp] aironet disable ssid when no lan connection

Hello, Is there a command on an 1131ag aironet ap that allows you to disable the ssid broadcast if there is no lan connection to the ap? Thanks, Dan. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] aironet disable ssid when no lan connection

Will station-role root access-point fallback track fa 0 under the radio interface work for you? On 4/3/09 9:10 PM, Dan Letkeman danletke...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is there a command on an 1131ag aironet ap that allows you to disable the ssid broadcast if there is no lan connection to the