Has anyone gotten VMware ESX 3.5 Update 4 to recognize the Qlogic
QLE8042 CNA with both the 10G Ethernet interface and FC HBA? We're
trying to get the server with the CNA installed connected to the Nexus
5000 and while the Ethernet interfaces are shown as up on the N5K, the
VFC interfaces are
There's no such policy-maps defined in your config.
If you supply an undefined policy-map in radius VSA then cisco just drops the
connection.
Michael
On Thursday 11 June 2009 08:13:24 pm Samantha (Regional Connect) wrote:
Hi
I have the radius issuing the following attribute (example)
You need to increment the sequence number:
lcp:interface-config#1=service-policy output 160
lcp:interface-config#2=service-policy input 2560
also make sure the service policy referred to are in you configuration :)
Samantha (Regional Connect) schreef:
Hi
I have the radius issuing the
Could cisco router 2800 series work under BGP protocol for internet ?
thx
_
Note: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity named above and may contain information
Yes... just not fast, but if you run a 2821/2852 with a gig of Ram, it can do
multiple tables quite fine, it just takes a little while to fully load all the
routes.
A 2811 with 768 will also be fine. I wouldn't try a 2801... even with 512 it
will be slow.
...Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens,
On 2009-06-11 21:01, Phil Mayers wrote:
I would avoid the sup720, the rsp720 has 2x the ram and more
Obviously it's worth emphasising that the RSP720 is 7600-only, and from
posts on this list it's still not in general availability I think?
True, the RSP is 7600-only, but only the RSP720-10GE
Hi,
we've got our ciscos configured that ip pool configuration is derived
from our radius servers.
In order to change the ip pool, I change the pool in the radius config.
But our ciscos are still using the old ip pool. It seems like some
caching issue.
Is there any way to let the cisco
Hi.
Depends on what you mean by work. A 2811 with 512 megs of RAM will handle
multiple full feeds ok. It chugs when they are first sent, but will handle
them fine. The question is really how many routes do you need from your
provider. You may only need a default from one provider and
Well, with the 6548, you're still going to be limited to 8 Gbps,
rather than 6 Gbps. It's a CEF256 card, which means it has an 8 Gbps
fabric connection to the supervisor, instead of just sharing the 32
Gbps like the 6148 does. So if you're looking to drive more than a
gig through an
I've done a lot of thinking and searching on this problem and I haven't
been able to figure out any way to solve it. The rest of the Engineers
here have come to the conclusion it just can't be done.
We have a pretty large deployment of Cisco 7200's with the vast majority
being carded out with
Your question is one of mine as well. I plan to from EC's across the 6548 and a
6516-GBIC (yes copper and fiber).
So does this essentially mean that every 6 ports has its own gig ASIC? So, I'd
have to stagger like: 1/1, 1/7, 1/13, etc.?
Now, if what you're reporting is correct (I'm sure it
Don't know if this would work, but why not bar them from the controller command
instead
Ie
Conf t
Controller T3 1/0 -Block this command
shut
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Byrd, William
Sent: 12
Unfortunately since they need access to build channel-groups for customer
DS1 transport this isn't an option. :-(
-Will
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacKinnon ian.mackin...@lumison.net
Sent: Fri, June 12, 2009 9:54
Subject:RE: [c-nsp] A question about TACACS+ and controlling command
On Jun 12, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Bill Blackford wrote:
Your question is one of mine as well. I plan to from EC's across the
6548 and a 6516-GBIC (yes copper and fiber).
So does this essentially mean that every 6 ports has its own gig
ASIC? So, I'd have to stagger like: 1/1, 1/7, 1/13, etc.?
Phil Mayers wrote:
Kevin Loch wrote:
Unfortunately, Cisco's partners are useless. They propose 6509s
without the DFCs, which we know will fall over.
Well that depends...
The DFC's only do next-hop (tcam) lookups and netflow. All packets are
switched on the centralized PFC. Each line
Geoffrey Pendery wrote:
I have a question of my own, since this subject has come up a time or
two - regarding the 6148's, the statement is made a couple times
that Etherchannel will get you port redundancy but no extra
bandwidth, since the ASIC is only a gig. But if I distribute my
channel
OK - found the REAL issue now.
My standby unit turned into a brick on me :o) I actually SAW it happen. All the
link lights went out at once.
Thanks again for the help.
-Jeff
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
The obvious answer is to restrict the use of the shutdown command.
Unfortunately the technicians that often make the mistakes
have to be able to use the command to shut down Serial or
Ethernet interfaces in the course of their work.
Something along the lines of this EEM Tcl policies:
On Friday 12 June 2009 11:34:14 am Pete Templin wrote:
Geoffrey Pendery wrote:
I have a question of my own, since this subject has come up a time or
two - regarding the 6148's, the statement is made a couple times
that Etherchannel will get you port redundancy but no extra
bandwidth,
You are correct. That only applies to the 6148. Originally it also
applied to the 6548 as well, but that limitation was removed later by
s/w optimizations in the LTL programming scheme. So you *can* get
more than 1G thru an etherchannel with 6548s, but of course, you
still can only get 1G max
On Jun 12, 2009, at 8:42 AM, Kevin Loch wrote:
Łukasz has already addressed this; suffice to say he's right, and
the above is not correct. A TCAM lookup *is* the forwarding
operation, and the DFC has all information required locally to
switch the packet (via the fabric) to the output
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:42:45AM -0400, Kevin Loch wrote:
A 6509 should not fall over without DFC's unless you are doing more
than 30mpps. That is 15gbit/s of 64 byte packets or 360gbit/s of
1500 byte packets.
Hah, keep drinking the cool aid! I have a pair of 6500s ready to fall
over at
I've got several outdoor Wi-Fi radios that I would like to configure in
a PtP configuration on multiple 802.11a channels.
My question to the list is, Can I use LACP on each end (via a network
switch) to aggregate those PtP connections into one virtual connection?
e.g.
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 12:58 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
Now let's talk about reality: 1/10 inbound/outbound ratios, 5% of
received traffic is Internet cruft requiring (wasted) TCAM lookups,
etc and such forth than any provider peering router observes, and
you're down to a much lower ratio.
Hi
I am trying to develop a small EEM applet to test shut a port when an event
on the port occurs.
The script i have written is
event manager applet EMSHUT
event syslog occurs 1 pattern my pattern
action 1.0 syslog priority emergencies msg HELLO
action 1.1 cli command enable
action 1.2 cli
On 13/06/2009, at 7:33 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Now, let's stop talking about non-DFC cards and start talking about
equipment which can handle uRPF on every port, full Netflow analysis
of up to 8 ports at a time, every port layer 3, every port filtered,
colo facility core/peering.
If this is
On Jun 13, 2009, at 3:52 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
I have a pair of 6500s ready to fall over at about 150kpps.
It sounds as if you've a lot of stuff being punted, which should bear
further investigation.
---
Roland
On Jun 13, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
Was the original intention of this thread not to find out exactly
what *is* the best tool for the above scenario? :)
GSR w/E3 or E5 LCs, ASR 1K, CRS-1, or N7K, depending upon the
circumstances (note initial FIB-size limitation on N7K; I don't
Could be yet another prompt-related EEM bug. See
http://blog.ioshints.info/2008/02/fix-bugs-in-eem-action-cli.html
http://blog.ioshints.info/2007/12/execute-cli-commands-with-prompts-in.html
Use the EEM debugging (debug event man action cli) to verify what's going
on.
Ivan
Now, let's stop talking about non-DFC cards and start talking about
equipment which can handle uRPF on every port, full Netflow analysis
of up to 8 ports at a time, every port layer 3, every port filtered,
colo facility core/peering.
On Jun 12, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
If this is
30 matches
Mail list logo
