Re: [c-nsp] Weird Cat 6500 SUP2 problem

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Security Team ci...@peakpeak.com wrote: I am setting up a 6509 with SUP2's in RPR+ redundancy mode.  When I cycle power on both supplies, the top SUP2 comes up fine. But the bottom one is stuck in rommon If I type b to boot the second one it comes up fine.

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst vs. Nexus

Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:28:25PM +0200, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: Now you know (one of the reasons) why some of us love our Juniper M/MX/T routers :-) Why am I not suprised at all to see this comment? ;-)) Now, with Junipers, you have incompatible hardware thingies

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst vs. Nexus

On 11/09/2009 11:36, Phil Mayers wrote: IOS sometimes feels like the very best that the 1980s has to offer... I mean, come on - I was actually IMPRESSED when 12.2(33)SX gave me show run part router bgp ASNUM. Is that really the best we can do in 2009? I remember my cisco account manager in

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst vs. Nexus

Nick Hilliard wrote: Cisco is a very large company and it appears to have a lot of empires. Multiple empires beget balkanisation and lead to the sort of software train splits that we see. I can imagine that it must be very difficult to keep any sort of control on source code, when you have

Re: [c-nsp] BFD on 7600

Justin Shore wrote: MKS wrote: Can you share your experience with BFD on the 7600 platform and sw release? I use it and like it. So did we (on SRD), until we hit bug CSCek38313. Fix coming in mid Nov apparently Regards, Dave ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst vs. Nexus

databazy 4416 (20090911) __ Tuto spravu preveril ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.sk ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst vs. Nexus

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:36:23AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote: It's also worth emphasising that JunOS has a consistent cross-platform API for configuring their devices, and has done for a long while now. Cisco's (embryonic) efforts seem to be falling firmly into the one XML schema per

[c-nsp] SNMP v3

hey all i have been reading the article from www.cisco.com http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0t/12_0t3/feature/guide/Snmp3.html and they mentioned the supported platforms and 2811 and 7600 for example are not mentioned is the list updated or they do not really support snmp v3 ?

[c-nsp] Cisco SCE 2020 and snmp question

Hi, I need to graph via snmp and mrtg or rrdttool , ip traffic and protocols for Cisco sce 2020 box. I saw in the web , the utility rtmcmd. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6135/products_user_guide09186a00808165dd.html#o16507. I´m trying to run the scripts, in a linux server,

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst vs. Nexus

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:57:40AM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote: To be fair, JUNOS has its share of warts here. They split up namespaces by JUNOS revision. Since the XML namespace is considered as part of the name of the tag, this means that though they have consistent schemata, their tags

[c-nsp] eigrp over atom

I'm having problems getting eigrp to talk over an mpls l2 link between two cpe devices. cpe -- 3550 -- 7206 -- 7206 -- 3560 -- cpe cpe - 3550: access port on 3550 3550 - 7206: trunked port on vlan 100 7206 - 7206: mpls l2 xconnect 7206 - 3560: trunked port on vlan 100 3560 - cpe: access port on

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Cat 6500 SUP2 problem

Make sure you have the bootvar's set right and the config register also correct on both SUP's, as I once had a SUP2 that wouldn't boot, just to find out the confreg on the spare was not right, so it was just dropping to ROMMON.. --- Howard Leadmon -Original Message- From: