Re: [c-nsp] Renumbering serial interfaces

Besides the reload in xx that several have mentioned you can also put secondary Ips on the link Nad then cancel the primary. I.e. interface ATM0/0.32 point-to-point Ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.252 secondary Telnet/ssh to this address using source address 2.2.2.1 Then no ip add 1.1.1.1

[c-nsp] multicast on transit LAN

Hi, i did some progress on this topic, with the help of ip igmp helper address. At L3 my network lab is like this, the vlan/network between 3560 and 3750 is the vlan 100. Customers_cpe--Cisco3560-| Customers_cpe--Cisco3560-| Customers_cpe--Cisco3560-|

Re: [c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router

Andy B. wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Tom Sands tsa...@rackspace.com wrote: The 6704 looks like the biggest problem in this setup. We avoid them at all cost. What would be your recommendation then? 6708? Absolutely, while a 2:1 card the buffers are far greater. Also,

Re: [c-nsp] Renumbering serial interfaces

I have a bunch of T-1 (ATM) interfaces that I need to renumber. I have always done this with 2 people, one on each end. Is it possible for one person to do this, from one end ? If I am on the near side, I log into the far sides serial IP and do this: You could setup ipv6 between the two

Re: [c-nsp] Renumbering serial interfaces

Sorry the last line should be ip address 208.70.109.156 255.255.255.255 Making the secondary primary, and removing the primary. I remember doing it with no ip address x.x.x.x but I just tried and it gives me the same error. Too much lunch I think. Brian -Original Message-

[c-nsp] Small Catalysts with odd no buffer errors

I have a 2950 switch we just provisioned to deploy, and in checking it out beforehand, have run into an unusual no buffers condition. I've seen this before but never been able to resolve what is causing it. See if this rings any bells... Doctors-Temp#sho int f0/1 FastEthernet0/1 is up, line

Re: [c-nsp] Renumbering serial interfaces

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:22:26 +0100, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote: On 2010.02.18 03:22, Brian Turnbow wrote: Besides the reload in xx that several have mentioned you can also put secondary Ips on the link Nad then cancel the primary. I.e. interface ATM0/0.32 point-to-point Ip add

[c-nsp] CIR with Radius on PPP interfaces

Hello, Is there a way to policing/cir/sla on a virtual PPP interface via radius, or am I asking the wrong question? I'm trying to set service levels on an LNS where the access layer doesn't support radius provisioning. Should I try to do this, or should service level always be dictated at the

Re: [c-nsp] CIR with Radius on PPP interfaces

Philip, Take a look here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/12_3x/12_3xi/feature/guide/123X IQoS.html You can download a policy-map profile name from RADIUS for PPP sessions. The policy-map in your case could only have a class-default class with a single action to police the traffic to

[c-nsp] Network-to-network connection - MPLS / non-MPLS

What options are available for establishing network-to-network connections between an MPLS network and a native IP network that has no current MPLS capability? The scenario I have is a single POP ISP (non-MPLS) that is desirous of establishing a connection to a larger MPLS-based ISP. The idea

Re: [c-nsp] Network-to-network connection - MPLS / non-MPLS

* EoMPLS over GRE * L2TPv3 -- Regards, Ge Moua Network Design Engineer University of Minnesota | OIT - NTS -- Mike wrote: What options are available for establishing network-to-network connections between an MPLS network and a native IP network that has no current MPLS capability? The

Re: [c-nsp] Renumbering serial interfaces

Hi, On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:58:56AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: I suppose that considering that this is a PtP link, the OP could apply an IPv6 address to each end, verify reachability, and temporarily remove all v4 addresses and still maintain a connection until the work is complete :)

Re: [c-nsp] EOMPLS between 10G subinterface and GE subinterface between two 7600

switchport nonegociate missing on the pe? 2010/2/17, Ioan Branet ioan.bra...@gmail.com: Hello, I used also vlan-tagging but with same result: show configuration interfaces xe-3/1/0 description ** Link To PE1 **; vlan-tagging; link-mode full-duplex; gigether-options {

[c-nsp] Missing BGP MIB support on Cisco 2621

According to Cisco's MIB Locator, c2600-is4-mz.123-26.bin should have CISCO-BGP4-MIB support, but when I try to walk that part of the tree (1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.187) in v1 or v2c that fails. I'm using this router to do IPv6 tunneling, and the only routes exchanged on this router are IPv6. Anyone else

[c-nsp] BGP Event Process

Hello, Does anyone know what that BGP event process does? Can't seem to find any references to it on cisco's website. show processes | i BGP|PID PID QTy PC Runtime (ms)Invoked uSecsStacks TTY Process 211 ME 412D1F30 59728232 138200687 432 5484/9000 0 BGP Router 213

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS VPN with lot of PPP interfaces and central firewall

Am 21.01.2010 10:41, Gerald Krause schrieb: Am 21.01.2010 08:10, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) schrieb: ... you might want to look at the Half-Duplex VRF feature, which allows to build a hub spoke VPN setup without having to put each branch on the same PE into a different VRF. HD VRF will assign

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS VPN with lot of PPP interfaces and central firewall

Am 19.02.2010 05:09, Gerald Krause schrieb: ... I've got this error message when the authentication take place: %VPDN-3-NORESOURCE: L2TP LNS no resources for user cpe2-vrftest; Result 2, Error 4, SSS Manager disconnected session When I remove the downstrem VRFTEST-DOWN part from the

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Event Process

Hello, Does anyone know what that BGP event process does? Can't seem to find any references to it on cisco's website. BGP event handles critical events like next-hop changes. why do you ask? oli ___ cisco-nsp mailing list