Hi.
Does anybody have the experince of using SCE8000 with two SCM-E modules? We
got the second SCM-E couple of days ago and SCE always boots in recovery
mode, when I install the second module.
I could not find any documentation about installing and configuring the
second SCM-E, I think it should
Hello Vijay,
Hope you are doing great!
My name is Pavel and I will be assisting you with your Service Dequest
999666999. I am sending this e-mail as an initial point of contact and
so that you can contact me if you need to.
Problem Description
As I have understood it till now, the issue is
Hi.
We have (2) Metro Ethernet connections from two different carriers
connecting our two locations at the moment. We need to provide for
redundancy at the L2 level for these, and would like to combine the
bandwidth into one logical bundle.
We will be using Cisco switches on both sides of
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:52:42 +0100, you wrote:
EtherChannel can be used if, and only if, both carriers tunnels the
EtherChannel protocol. Such tunneling is only supported on VPWS (aka
Q-in-Q) type of circuits.
Well, actually one *could* run static EtherChannel (A.K.A. 'mode on')
without
I'm wondering how best to solve having a 7200/NPE-G1 with two
connections (inside and outside) in a redundant configuration,
considering that the router only has 3 interfaces.
The router is supposed to terminate an IPSec tunnel on one side and
route traffic towards the inside interface. The
Peter,
-Original Message-
I'm wondering how best to solve having a 7200/NPE-G1 with two
connections (inside and outside) in a redundant configuration,
considering that the router only has 3 interfaces.
The router is supposed to terminate an IPSec tunnel on one side and
route
Pavel,
Thanks, you made my day! It's the same action plan that I got the last
times we opened a case with Cisco ;-)
Regards,
Jeroen van Ingen
ICT Service Centre
University of Twente, P.O.Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Original Message
From:
Team,
i have installed one 3800 cisco router at my one of customer end, and
ihave to submit some security documents , in that document i have explain
cryptographic features, please help me for this, if anyone is having related
documents or how the cryptographic features are working i n the 3800
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 13:07 +0100, Daniska, Tomas wrote:
On the outside connection, do you really need to close the L2 loop at
the router side? I suggest it would be better to use two
point-to-point L3 subnets and a dynamically routed loopback interface
that would terminate the tunnel.
Yes,
Mikhail,
I recommend you open a TAC case, as this could be a hardware problem,
but it requires some debugging...
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mikhail Schedrin
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 11:46
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Denial
of Service Vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100303-cucm
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2010 March 3 1600 UTC (GMT
Mikhail,
Be sure both sce have the same pkg installed before you insert the second
one to the sce.
Which version are you running as it should be 3.6 and higher...
Jacob
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) avay...@cisco.comwrote:
Mikhail,
I recommend you open a TAC case, as
chris stand cstand...@gmail.com writes:
instructor led with onsite equipment ?
instructor led with remote equipment ?
I had several training courses both with on site and remote
equipment. Remote equipment is okay unless the Internet connection
breaks. Happened to me once: We decided to move
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Digital
Media Manager
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100303-dmm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100303-dmm.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2010 March 03 1600 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Digital Media Player Remote Display
Unauthorized Content Injection Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100303-dmp
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100303-dmp.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release
Greetings
We have a mixed BGP and OSPF routing environment. The routing protocol
on the MPLS and point to point T-1s is mostly BGP with some OSPF (but
moving to BGP). A vendor of ours to whom we have a WAN link advertises
via OSPF (and can not advertise via BGP). This link is in a DMZ off of
the
Hello,
I have a police-map applied to a vlan interface set to 10mbit. Works fine, as
long as traffic is routed on the CEF720 48 port module. But the moment traffic
is routed on the RSP720, traffic is above the 10mbit.
Is there something on the RSP720 that needs to enabled?
Here is my
Sharlon Carty wrote:
Hello,
I have a police-map applied to a vlan interface set to 10mbit. Works fine, as long as traffic is routed on the CEF720 48 port module. But the moment traffic is routed on the RSP720, traffic is above the 10mbit.
Is there something on the RSP720 that needs to
I'm running into some issues where the 7600's I have in place don't
want to redistribute connected subnets into ospf, only seems to happen
on the SUP720-3b image, and have the issue with 12.2(33)SRD(2a|3)
Anyone else run into this issue?, So far, TAC can't reproduce it. I'm
considering
We had a similar situation with rsp720's and sup720's, and under each
l3 vlan interface, had to add 'mls qos bridged' for the rate-limiting to
work as expected, as well as the other mls commands you have configured
on the trunk port in your example below
On 03/03/2010 01:43 PM, Sharlon Carty
What's the currently recommended stable IOS for the 7600 (sup720-3bxl)
with Service Provider (IP/MPLS/QoS/etc) intent? I see a reply from
Rodney back in April'09 recommended SRB, but I'm curious what it is
today..
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Lasher, Donn wrote:
What's the currently recommended stable IOS for the 7600 (sup720-3bxl)
with Service Provider (IP/MPLS/QoS/etc) intent? I see a reply from
Rodney back in April'09 recommended SRB, but I'm curious what it is
today..
SRD4 looks very promising, don't know
SRD2a and SRD3 on the sup720-3b has a bug where you can't check ospf neighbor
relationships via snmp, if that's a consideration.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Wed 3/3/2010 10:53 PM
To: Lasher, Donn
Cc:
Hi,
I am very thankful if anybody please suggest?
Regards
Daljit Singh
From: Daljit Singh - Core Network
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 7:09 PM
To: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: Comparison between Cisco and Juniper for Multicast Services
Hi,
I want to know the
Team,
i have installed one 3800 cisco router at my one of customer end, and
ihave to submit some security documents , in that document i have explain
cryptographic features, please help me for this, if anyone is having related
documents or how the cryptographic features are working i n the 3800
25 matches
Mail list logo