Re: [c-nsp] SXI3 strange issue, Loose mode uRPF jumps to strict by itself

On (2010-07-29 23:07 +0200), bas wrote: ACL's for customers is too much work, tedious and prone to mistakes. It can be. In ideal world routers are only touched when testing new products or troubleshooting software defects. Master configuration should live in customer database out of which

Re: [c-nsp] Juniper M320 vs. 7600/SUP320-3BXL and WS-X6148A-GE-TX

what about asr9k with low-queue cards? its price and performance is reasonable as well. br, A. On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Chris Hale wrote: Hello, Looking for options to our next upgrade from our 7200VXR platform. Someone suggested 7600 and the WS-X6148A-GE-TX cards with a SUP720-3BXL. We're

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast issues on 7600s with WS-6748-sfp blades

It never worked, when I sent that reply I had mistakenly thought it was an internal email. I feel sorry for you Tim :-) ... you continue to get beat up for a simple mistake from many many moons ago! This e-mail, including any attachments and response string, may contain proprietary

Re: [c-nsp] Smart Net for used Cisco

SOP. It is in my experience easier if you have Network Hardware arrange the smartnet as well when you buy it, otherwise cisco might have you do something like send them a picture of the serial number on the card or something crazy like that (I've heard). I buy used/rfb all the time from my VAR

[c-nsp] vPC Object Tracking (used when vPC Peer Link with Single 10G Module)

I am looking for the vPC Object Tracking Solution NX-OS configuration that solve blackout issue when using vPC Peer Link with Single 10G Module. The vPC object tracking enhancement tracks uplinks and vPC peer link as an object list. When vPC object tracking is enabled, a vPC peer detects the

[c-nsp] Define MPLS default EXP value?

Hi all, we're planning to introduce MPLS within our network backbone, among other things for QoS purposes. Our current concept is based solely on using EXP values for different priority levels (the IP TOS fields need to be left unchanged.) Aside from applications which require higher-than-normal

[c-nsp] %ERROR: Standby doesn't support this command

Anyone, I'm having issues with some 4510s with dual Sup6-E running 12.2(53)SG2 doing this on interface range command. Making our deployment kind of tough: SCUAS01(config-if)#interface range GigabitEthernet1/1 - 48 SCUAS01(config-if-range)# switchport mode access %ERROR: Standby doesn't

Re: [c-nsp] GigE Throughput on 3825

Seth is completely correct that it's all about CPU. Don't quote me but I think we rate the 3825 at about 300 kpps(number is out of date so newer IOS may not reach this number) . This is likely a 0 feature number so it could be much lower if QoS, GRE, uRPF, etc, etc, etc are used. -Ben On Jul

Re: [c-nsp] Define MPLS default EXP value?

On 30.7.2010 17:57, Patrick Abeldt wrote: Hi all, we're planning to introduce MPLS within our network backbone, among other things for QoS purposes. Our current concept is based solely on using EXP values for different priority levels (the IP TOS fields need to be left unchanged.) Aside from

Re: [c-nsp] Define MPLS default EXP value?

Ignoring some of the more exotic QoS that can be done on the 7600 CWAN cards, on the 6500/7600 platform you only have two options I am aware of. 1) trust the incoming TOS and it will be mapped to EXP automatically. 2) use service-policy on non-trusted interface to set all EXP values manually.

Re: [c-nsp] GigE Throughput on 3825

Thanks to everyone who has already responded on and offline. So it really boils down to the router can forward so many pps limited by the power of the CPU and depending on packet size actual bandwidth may vary? -Jeff -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] GigE Throughput on 3825

On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Jeff Wojciechowski wrote: Thanks to everyone who has already responded on and offline. So it really boils down to the router can forward so many pps limited by the power of the CPU and depending on packet size actual bandwidth may vary? Google for

Re: [c-nsp] GigE Throughput on 3825

That's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks! -Jeff -Original Message- From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 12:21 PM To: Jeff Wojciechowski Cc: Benjamin Lovell; Seth Mattinen; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GigE Throughput on

[c-nsp] GSR not switching multicast

Hi all, maybe it's just too late and I'm blind but can't leave home until I finish this, does anyone have a hint please? IOS (tm) GS Software (C12KPRP-K4P-M), Version 12.0(32)SY4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) PIM in SSM, everything is signalled fine. G2/0/5 is receiving multicast streams, and

Re: [c-nsp] %ERROR: Standby doesn't support this command

On 7/30/10, Church, Charles charles.chu...@harris.com wrote: Anyone, I'm having issues with some 4510s with dual Sup6-E running 12.2(53)SG2 doing this on interface range command. Making our deployment kind of tough: SCUAS01(config-if)#interface range GigabitEthernet1/1 - 48

Re: [c-nsp] GSR not switching multicast

How about allowing igmp message in/out the interface? permit igmp any any Matthew Huff   | One Manhattanville Rd OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577 http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff  | Fax:   914-460-4139 -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] Define MPLS default EXP value?

There have been a couple of good answers already, but if you really want to change what EXP value is assigned to packets that have no other TOS marking, then you could also look at changing the dscp-exp map. From what I have read (and I'm happy to be corrected on this) the PFC based QoS