Morning,
PSes with Output Fail red lights. Upon close investigation it looks
[...]
Has any seen two PSes seemily die at the same time? Deep down I think
I *think* (read: I might be wrong but) that the PSes also switch off
and show OUTPUT FAIL when the router is shutdown from the
Seth Mattinen wrote:
What's the difference between the C6500 and the 7600?
Just software?
Oh no, you're going to wake Gert :-).
I always find Gert's input quite educational. ;)
As do I, but being somewhat of a newbie with all this stuff, I find
lurking and reading the conversations of
On 8/31/2010 8:55 PM, Michael Damkot wrote:
sounds like you're missing your boot pointers in the config...
boot-start-marker
boot system disk0:c7600s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.bla-bla-bla.bin
boot-end-marker
True, there wasn't a boot statement (Doh). I also noticed the SP
confreg was 0x0.
On 8/31/10 3:20 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
Hi,
I have a customer with a 7204VXR / NPE300 and 256MB DRAM and the
following cards/interfaces:
-C7200-IO-FE-MII/RJ45=
-PA-8T-V35= (only three serial interfaces in use)
-PA-FE-TX
-PA-FE-TX (spare)
-PA-1GE=
It currently
On 01/09/10 01:55, Michael Damkot wrote:
sounds like you're missing your boot pointers in the config...
boot-start-marker
boot system disk0:c7600s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.bla-bla-bla.bin
boot-end-marker
Not necessarily. I've seen (recent) SSO failures on dual-sup 6500
systems where the
The NPE-G2 is better if you want to forward some 1Gbps
through the box (configuration-dependent).
Bottom line, the NPE-G1/G2 gives you great value with those
on-board Gig-E ports.
Still not great if you want to handle a line rate DDoS attack with
minimum size packets...
Steinar Haug,
If you are shopping the used market, you may be better off with the
7200 series. The 7500 isnt worth the juice it sucks and even when
it was supported, it was an abysmal experience.
I'd agree with you on the 7200 preference, and the horrible power usage, but
there *were* good times with the
Joe Maimon wrote:
Real world I would not expect any more than roughly the same throughput
through a 7500 RSP4 with VIP2-50 as you will an NPE-400.
Of course. However, GEIP+ are significantly cheaper than PA-GEs, and
I'm running VIP4-80s. I'd love to run an RSP8 but they still cost $$$.
Still not great if you want to handle a line rate DDoS
attack with minimum size packets...
Agree - but if the budget is tight, some pain might not be
avoidable.
My take is if you want to handle 1Gbps (or better) on a
sustained basis (as opposed to a couple of hundred-Mbps at
peak),
It could also be one power to have insufficient power to run switch:
check using show power
#sh power
system power redundancy mode = redundant
system power total = 3806.46 Watts (90.63 Amps @ 42V)
system power used = 2041.20 Watts (48.60 Amps @ 42V)
system power available = 1765.26
Hello list
2 weeks ago i upgraded my WS-C6503-E/WS-SUP32-GE-3B to ios
advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI4a.
Since then I've seen 2 cases of layer 2 loop. This switch/router forms a layer
2 ring with 3 other switch/routers (for redundancy). This has ben working for
years without problems.
Has
hi,
thanks for the reply.
the document you pointed out
(http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf)
was good for the start, thank you. but it was very limited.
it just had the result for switching of 64Byte frame packets, not any static or
http://www.cisco.com/go/epc
For those of you that have used it and find it helpful in solving
problems in the network and would be willing...could you send me a short
quote *offline please* about the value it has been to you and how.
Rodney
___
Thanks for posting the URL for the router performance matrix. Anyone
know of a similar matrix for switches (L2 L3) and firewalls?
cjw
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:16:24 +0200
From: B?vre Jon Harald jon.harald.bo...@hafslund.no
To: 'bored to death' bored_to_deat...@yahoo.com,
On 9/1/10 7:55 AM, bored to death wrote:
hi,
thanks for the reply.
the document you pointed out
(http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf)
was good for the start, thank you. but it was very limited.
it just had the result for switching
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, bored to death wrote:
the document you pointed out
(http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf)
was good for the start, thank you. but it was very limited.
it just had the result for switching of 64Byte frame packets, not any
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 02:24:19 pm
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Still not great if you want to handle a line rate DDoS
attack with minimum size packets...
Agree - but if the budget is tight, some pain might not be
avoidable.
My take is if you want to handle 1Gbps (or better) on a
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, bored to death wrote:
as i know, the normal frame size of ordinary networks are 1500Bytes which is
very bigger than 64Byte. for example, in this document, the maximum switching
The average is definitely not 1500 bytes, more like 500-700 bytes. Most of
packets are either
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10:55:48 pm bored to death
wrote:
we have universal RFC 2544 for performance benchmarks of
network devices like routers , etc. i was wondering and
it's just a thought, shouldn't cisco or other vendors
give performance specifications of their products based
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 07:55:48AM -0700, bored to death wrote:
the document you pointed out
(http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf)
was good for the start, thank you. but it was very limited.
it just had the result for switching of
On 9/1/2010 09:04, Christopher J. Wargaski wrote:
Thanks for posting the URL for the router performance matrix. Anyone
know of a similar matrix for switches (L2 L3) and firewalls?
Google cisco switch performance
~Seth
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
A much better link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/netmgmt/configuration/guide/nm_packet_capture_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html
On 9/1/2010 11:52 AM, Rodney Dunn wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/go/epc
For those of you that have used it and find it helpful in solving
Anyone have these boxes and pumping a lot (1G thru most of the ports) of
traffic thru it? I've seen some older threads reagarding high CPU utilization
issues, low buffer concerns, etc. They are fairly iniexpensive compared to a
3560E or X and the oversub is basically 1:1.
This e-mail,
Yep! Here is the quick wiki page with an example on CSC (Cisco Support
Community):
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-5799
I'm working to get the functionality expanded and wanted some direct
customer references to this being helpful to speed up issue resolution,
reduce down time,
I am responsible to implement a DRAC Network. But I am in doubt of
what would be the best way to implement this network, I dont have any
experience at all with this type of implementation.
I have considered Cisco with Private-VLAN, but my manager doesnt have
budget for a network full of Cisco
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:46:10PM -0400, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
[...]
(By profession, I'm a coder -- I do this network stuff in my spare time
because I think it's cool.)
It's all cool.
But we're cooler. :-)
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
26 matches
Mail list logo
