Hello,
I have a problem with SIP to ISDN internetworking on Cisco IOS.
I'm unable to receive early-media messages from the ISDN side of the call.
Hardware and software versions are: Cisco 2800 Software
(C2800NM-ENTSERVICES-M), Version 12.4(20)T6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2).
# debug isdn q931 int
man, 15 11 2010 kl. 10:29 +, skrev Tomas Daniska:
it's not only ARP reply that takes into account when talking
operability of such solutions.
At one particular case, we had been hit hard with this clustering
method. Over the time, everything worked as the old switches were
slightly lax
Benny,
it's not only ARP reply that takes into account when talking operability of
such solutions.
At one particular case, we had been hit hard with this clustering method. Over
the time, everything worked as the old switches were slightly lax on RFP
compliance. After upgrading to a 3C[XL]
-Original Message-
From: Benny Amorsen [mailto:benny+use...@amorsen.dk]
Microsoft were by far not the first to do this, and I still believe that
it is a brilliant solution to a difficult problem, even though we do not
use it.
Maybe, still changes nothing on the fact that if they
Exactly what problems are you experiencing? One way audio? No
ringback? DTMF issues etc?
Have you tried voice rtp send-recv? This is used for cut Through
Two-Way Audio Early. Not sure it will help though.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/voice/command/reference/vrf_t.html#wp1076026
Please post your sanitized sip-ua config. You may be missing your progress
mappings.
Sent from handheld
On Nov 15, 2010, at 5:36 AM, Marco Marzetti ma...@lamehost.it wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with SIP to ISDN internetworking on Cisco IOS.
I'm unable to receive early-media
-Original Message-
From: Benny Amorsen [mailto:benny+use...@amorsen.dk]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 1:30 PM
If you have the switches do the duplication, you save having to buy a
dedicated duplication appliance (load balancer) which itself can be a
correct me if I'm wrong - but
On Monday, November 15, 2010 06:23:26 am Pete Lumbis wrote:
Only a guess, but I'd probably say they didn't test new
code with old rommon so they can't guarantee something
won't go wrong. I've seen plenty of times where it will
work perfectly fine forever, but if they never tested it
they
Robert,
Looking here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6406/data_s
heet_c78-584733.html
DC power supplies already exist...
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert Hass
Worked like a charm. Thanks for the help.
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Soares [mailto:amsoa...@netcabo.pt]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 7:50 PM
To: Todd Shipway; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Bridging Serial Interfaces
R1/R2:
Bridge irb
Bridge 1 protocol ieee
Hi all
I brought new ASA and would like to upgrade the fireware as it doesn't
support Gig
1/ How can I get this upgrade?
2/ ls it free CCO?
3/ what is free SmartNET account
Thank you so much
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Curious why cisco recommends to upgrade rommon if it works also
on older version ?!
My guess: so they have a simple reason to throw the ball back in your court
when insert problem here happens.
-Randy
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hi
Could anyone tell me what CPU is used in the DFC3CXL? Could not find any
information related.
I'm interested in Netflow Data Export (NDE) performance on the DFC3CXL:
does it have the same NDE performance as RSP720 or is it more like SUP720?
Thanks
On 15/11/2010 15:30, Sergey Nikitin wrote:
I'm interested in Netflow Data Export (NDE) performance on the DFC3CXL:
does it have the same NDE performance as RSP720 or is it more like SUP720?
The DFC3XL does not do NDE. This is done by the RP on the RSP720 / SUP720.
Nick
On 15/11/10 15:24, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 15/11/2010 15:30, Sergey Nikitin wrote:
I'm interested in Netflow Data Export (NDE) performance on the DFC3CXL:
does it have the same NDE performance as RSP720 or is it more like SUP720?
The DFC3XL does not do NDE. This is done by the RP on the
Really?
Router#show processes cpu | i NDE
195 8 343 23 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Earl
NDE Task
Router#remote command switch show proc cpu | i NDE
178 12 1 12000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0
Netflow NDE Task
416 3358520648 502274475
On 15/11/2010 16:31, Phil Mayers wrote:
Actually, as I understand it in certain configurations the NDE packets can
be generated and emitted by the DFC CPU. As I recall, certain netflow
options and/or masks prevent this from happening, and require the RP CPU to
either modify the NDE packets which
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Deric Kwok wrote:
I brought new ASA and would like to upgrade the fireware as it doesn't
support Gig
1/ How can I get this upgrade?
I'm assuming you bought an ASA 5510? If so, I think a Security Plus
license is required to do what you want to do. Your best bet would
Try adding isdn send-alerting to the interface and voice call
send-alert to the root config.
On 11/15/2010 3:36 AM, Marco Marzetti wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with SIP to ISDN internetworking on Cisco IOS.
I'm unable to receive early-media messages from the ISDN side of the call.
Hardware
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:44:26 +0100, Roger Wiklund co...@xy.org wrote:
Exactly what problems are you experiencing? One way audio? No
ringback? DTMF issues etc?
Have you tried voice rtp send-recv? This is used for cut Through
Two-Way Audio Early. Not sure it will help though.
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:51:49 +0100, Brian Turnbow b.turn...@twt.it
wrote:
Hi Marco
See inline
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Marco Marzetti
Sent: lunedì 15 novembre 2010 10:36
To:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:00:21 +, Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com wrote:
Please post your sanitized sip-ua config. You may be missing your
progress mappings.
Sent from handheld
On Nov 15, 2010, at 5:36 AM, Marco Marzetti ma...@lamehost.it wrote:
Hello,
My sip-ua setting is totally
On Sunday, November 14, 2010 01:04:04 pm Jared Mauch wrote:
On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:12 PM, ML wrote:
I've often wondered if people pay attention to the firmware of their
linecards.
I wonder how many people know there is another level of software at play
and that it could be upgraded
Marco,
-Original Message-
From: Marco Marzetti [mailto:ma...@lamehost.it]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 12:10 PM
My sip-ua setting is totally plain.
What setup do you reccomend?
It is to a Broadworks / Broadsoft platform?
If so, I typically use the last pstn-cause, but the first
On 2010-11-15 16:31, Phil Mayers wrote:
Actually, as I understand it in certain configurations the NDE packets can
be generated and emitted by the DFC CPU. As I recall, certain netflow
options and/or masks prevent this from happening, and require the RP CPU to
either modify the NDE packets
Hello,
I configured my dial-peer in this way:
dial-peer voice 1400 pots
voice cut-through alert
preference 4
destination-pattern 199151119
progress_ind setup enable 1
no digit-strip
port 0/0/1:15
!
Better to use progress_ind setup enable 3
Telling the network that the
Hello all,
I have just received notification below.
-pavel
Get Ready for Software Download Enhancements on Cisco Website
To improve your experience with Cisco and protect your investment in
Cisco Products, we’re pleased to announce the improvement of Software
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
I have just received notification below.
[...]
To improve your experience with Cisco and protect your investment in
Cisco Products, we’re pleased to announce the improvement of Software
download entitlement controls effective December 13, 2010.
I
On 11/15/2010 11:46, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
I have just received notification below.
[...]
To improve your experience with Cisco and protect your investment in
Cisco Products, we’re pleased to announce the improvement of Software
download
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:34:35PM +0100, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
I have just received notification below.
Get Ready for Software Download Enhancements on Cisco Website
Enhancements, heh.
Oh well. I think we'll go and buy more Vendor $J gear in the
At 02:46 PM 11/15/2010, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
I have just received notification below.
[...]
To improve your experience with Cisco and protect your investment in
Cisco Products, we're pleased to announce the improvement of Software
download
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Oh well. I think we'll go and buy more Vendor $J gear in the future
- a single OS image that runs on all their routers (at least that's
what I've been told).
Yeah. One for MX, one for EX2200, one for EX8k, next one for
Hi
I was wondering is disabling 'bgp nexthop trigger' will decrease a
little CPU usage on router ? Eg.:
cisco(config)#router bgp 111
cisco(config-router)#address-family ipv4
cisco(config-router)#no bgp nexthop trigger enable
Router currently holds 3 full BGP feeds from external peers and nearly
Are you having to reduce BGP usage because your processor is pegged all the
time with BGP processes (scanner, etc.) or because it spikes? The processor is
supposed to spike while it's doing it's updates. Here's a GSR's output while
scanning.
CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/0%; one
Hi
Is any plan to implement ASN 32-bit (4 bytes) inside IOS of smaller
Catalysts ? Eg. 3560-X/3750-X - 12.2(55)SE or 4900M 12.2(54)SG ?
If yes when it will happen ? Maybe next IOS release ?
It's look like small Catalysts are platforms from Cisco which is not
support ASN 32bit. This feature is
We are considering terminating our T1s on on a GSR 12008. I just found the
6CT3-SMB 6Port Channelized T3 card, description of which can be found here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/6t3.html#wp1043332
Am curious if anyone is using this Card for T1s on the GSR and, if
Wow. This is probably going to be a nightmare for shared support providers too.
I really hope there's an 'enhancement' that helps them out, otherwise I image
they'll have to manage their customers logins somehow...
--Dan Holme
On 15 Nov 2010, at 19:34, Pavel Skovajsa pavel.skova...@gmail.com
I'ved used in it in the past. No issues seen back then. now you might want
to check to see if the card can do full feeds of bgp still (know some of the
older cards ran into running out of memory)
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 18:21, Dominic Ogbonna domi...@broadconnect.cawrote:
We are considering
From what I understand, it isn't a single image but it is an identical
command line experience.
Ie. The commands are all the same but there are differences in the compile.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:34:35PM +0100, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
I have just received notification below.
Get Ready for Software Download Enhancements on Cisco Website
On 2010-11-16 01:27, Michael Loftis wrote:
Juniper certainly has much less of the insanity of feature levels and
release trains [...]
...and a very limited subset of platforms comparing to Cisco. In terms
of going forward, IOS is being unified under IOS-XR umbrella (SPs),
NX-OS (DC) and
On 2010-11-16 00:13, Robert Hass wrote:
Hi
Is any plan to implement ASN 32-bit (4 bytes) inside IOS of smaller
Catalysts ? Eg. 3560-X/3750-X - 12.2(55)SE or 4900M 12.2(54)SG ?
If yes when it will happen ? Maybe next IOS release ?
Yes, there are plans, no, they're not public AFAIK, please talk
The most efficient way to filter all prefixes from a peer is no
neighbor x.x.x.x :) But seriously like Mike said, there is no good
reason to have a peer and filter all the prefixes from it.
If you are seeing CPU spikes during BGP scanner I don't see how
disabling next hop tracking will
What he said, while adding that the CPU on the DFC is the same CPU as
the SP on the PFC. DFC can still see pretty significant CPU usage as
even if the RP or SP is doing the export the DFC CPU must still do all
the recored creation, aging, etc. Very fast aging timers drive up the
DFC CPU
Dear All,
We are planning to implement IPv6 to our existing IPv4 network.
There are several things I would like to ask:-
1. Can IPv4 and IPv6 devices exist at the same time in the same LAN? and can
they communicate with each other?
2. If both IPv4 and IPv6 devices can be in the same LAN,
Thank you all.
And once again, could anyone tell me what DFC CPU is used in the
WS-X6708-10G-3CXL? I believe that remote command module X show version
will show this information.
Thanks
Benjamin Lovell wrote:
What he said, while adding that the CPU on the DFC is the same CPU as
the SP on
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:35:36AM +0100, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
...and a very limited subset of platforms comparing to Cisco. In terms
of going forward, IOS is being unified under IOS-XR umbrella (SPs),
NX-OS (DC) and IOS-XE (everything else).
Looking forward to see IOS-XE on Cisco
I plan to use the port on WS-X6548-GE-TX linecard (on 7600 router) to dial
PPPoE for Internet connection. Is it possible?
Thanks in advanced!
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
48 matches
Mail list logo
