Hi,
I have a policy which I can see currently not applied on any interface, I
am trying to modify the policy (remove existing class-map and add new
class-map), but when I commit I see following message !!% Policy manager
does not support this feature: Platform does not support policy-map
Can you please confirm the modified configuration / new class-map? We are
running same version on CRS-1s with no. of policies modification on need
basis. This should not be the case...
-FJ
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Vikas Sharma vikasshar...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I have a policy which I
Hi Farhan,
All other policies I am able to modify except this. Also this is the only
policy with qos-group (for incoming packets)
policy-map CR_QOS_FROM_PE-CORE
class Premium-From-PE_CORE
set qos-group 5
!
class Business1-From-PE-CORE
set qos-group 3
!
class Business2-From-PE-CORE
set
Hi All,
I am noting CRC errors on my Ethernet port on my cisco router, what could it
be causing it..
--
**
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On 23/02/2011 9:19 PM, alex nyagah wrote:
Hi All,
I am noting CRC errors on my Ethernet port on my cisco router, what could it
be causing it..
duplex mismatch, bad cable, cosmic rays.
Send though a show interface from both ends.
-James.
___
duplex?
On 23.02.2011 12:19, alex nyagah wrote:
Hi All,
I am noting CRC errors on my Ethernet port on my cisco router, what could it
be causing it..
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, alex nyagah wrote:
I am noting CRC errors on my Ethernet port on my cisco router, what
could it be causing it..
You have to provide more information. Is this copper or fiber, what speed,
what is at the other end, how long is the cable etc.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson
Dear
I intergrated Cisco CSM 3.3.1 with Cisco ACS 4.2. After intergreting i am able
to login with ACS users and user defined in system identity setup but i have
don't have the sufficient previledge assiged (even i can't see the devices
added in CMS).
Also when CSM communicate first time
First thing I would do would be to check for a duplex mismatch and then check
the wiring (either by replacing the cable if it's a simple patch or using a
cable tester over the span.) You might also just physically trace it and see if
someone decided to hang a fluorescent light off of it or
Hi,
Usually when Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) errors are incrementing in the
show interface command output, it indicates that the cyclic redundancy
checksum generated by the originating LAN/WAN device does not match the
checksum calculated from the data received. On a LAN, this usually indicates
Thanks so much, I now have a point to start checking...
alex
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Kasper Adel karim.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Usually when Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) errors are incrementing in the
show interface command output, it indicates that the cyclic redundancy
Hello umair:
CONFIGURING BFD
BFD can be configured in two steps.
The
first step in configuring BFD is setting the baseline parameters for
all BFD sessions on an interface. The configuration occurs at the
interface level and the syntax is as follows:
[no] bfd interval 50-999 min_rx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco
TelePresence Multipoint Switch
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20110223-telepresence-ctms
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2011 February 23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco
TelePresence Recording Server
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20110223-telepresence-ctrs
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2011 February 23 1600 UTC (GMT
A few months ago we started having issues on one of our LNS's (7602-VXR) and
the issue was that the bearer that we had from the supplier (BT in our case)
was being ~100% utilised for the bandwidth we had purchased but because it was
only a percentage of the interface speed our NMS was not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA 5500
Series Adaptive Security Appliances
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20110223-asa
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2011 February 23 1600 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Firewall Services Module Skinny Client
Control Protocol Inspection Denial of Service Vulnerability
Document ID: 112893
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20110223-fwsm
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2011 February 23 1600 UTC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco
TelePresence Endpoint Devices
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20110223-telepresence-cts
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2011 February 23 1600
Am getting numerous logs with the following message:
Feb 23 20:54:02: %LSMPI-4-INJECT_FEATURE_ESCAPE: Egress IP packet delivered
via legacy inject pat
cant seems to make heads or tails of it.
Kindly assist
Regards,
Righa Shake
___
cisco-nsp mailing
On 23/02/2011 18:57, Dinesh wrote:
Does Cisco 6500 (6500-E) support 40G interface ?
Not currently, no.
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
hi,
okay...i appear to have mislaid some memory cells over the past month
which coincides with a major bout of unable to drive google/bing or cisco.com
properly(!) ;-)
basically, auth logs show a device somewhere is trying to log into
some switches with wrong user/pass. and I cant
wouldn't the IP of the host it speaks of in the logs? or does it just say
failed log in from somewhere out on the network…?
my logs have a src…
%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list denied tcp 88.243.16.148(3900) - 10.142.7.1(23), 1
packet
-g
On Feb 23, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Alan Buxey wrote:
hi,
Hi,
wouldn't the IP of the host it speaks of in the logs? or does it just say
failed log in from somewhere out on the network…?
my logs have a src…
%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list denied tcp 88.243.16.148(3900) - 10.142.7.1(23),
1 packet
the device is on a legit bit of network so will be
Hi Alan,
The following command might help. It needs aaa new-model to be enabled
I believe.
login on-failure log
Feb 23 21:46:23.922: %SEC_LOGIN-4-LOGIN_FAILED: Login failed [user:
test] [Source: 10.0.0.1] [localport: 22] [Reason: Login Authentication
Failed] at 21:46:23 CET Wed Feb 23 2011
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 14:21, Alan Buxey a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
wouldn't the IP of the host it speaks of in the logs? or does it just say
failed log in from somewhere out on the network…?
my logs have a src…
%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list denied tcp 88.243.16.148(3900) -
This seems to come back with the info in the log:
login on-failure log
sh log shows this:
Feb 23 15:39:53.667: %SEC_LOGIN-4-LOGIN_FAILED: Login failed [user: ] [Source:
X.X.X.X] [localport: 23] [Reason: Login Authentication Failed] at 15:39:53 EST
Wed Feb 23 2011
Thanks,
Erik
-Original
Hi,
This seems to come back with the info in the log:
login on-failure log
sh log shows this:
Feb 23 15:39:53.667: %SEC_LOGIN-4-LOGIN_FAILED: Login failed [user: ]
[Source: X.X.X.X] [localport: 23] [Reason: Login Authentication Failed] at
15:39:53 EST Wed Feb 23 2011
oh, if only all
Hi,
You can log the successful ACL attempts too, even though the login
..of course! i'm always thinking of logging the bad things. thanks!
alan
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
On 23/02/2011 22:07, Dinesh wrote:
Thanks
one of link on cisco website showed 2010 as the time line for 40G on
6500. if you know of the current time line ?
is there any 40G planned for Cisco7606 ?
40G support depends on the sup2t, which has been delayed for some years.
Cisco say it's due out
We’re currently aggregating DSL connections with a Cisco 7401 using RFC 1483
bridged. We want to migrate from bridged to PPPoE and authenticate and assign
IP addresses with RADIUS.
We’re looking for sample configurations which have both 1483 bridged and PPPoE
interfaces on the same box. We'd
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 14:07 -0800, Dinesh wrote:
one of link on cisco website showed 2010 as the time line for 40G on
6500. if you know of the current time line ?
Just like Sup2T and N7k MPLS, it's permanently available at the end of
$(( $current_month + 4 )) or something. :-)
--
Peter
I have a bonded T3 that I have never been able to get over 45mbs. I
have been on the phone with my ISP and they are able to verify that
both circuits work and they feel bonded circuits are working fine and
that any problem is on my side Does anybody know what could cause a
bonded T3 not to be
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Lawrence cisco-...@theindianmaiden.com wrote:
I have a bonded T3 that I have never been able to get over 45mbs. I
have been on the phone with my ISP and they are able to verify that
both circuits work and they feel bonded circuits are working fine and
that any
Hi All,
Was hoping someone can provide some advice with regards to troubleshooting a
particularly painful multicast issue.
The set up isnt particularly complex:
Servers SwitchTunnel router (RP) GRE over WAN Tunnel router
SwitchServers
The tunnel router interfaces have been configured
How have you bonded the DS3? Typically load balancing on cisco boxes
are per session so you will never get over anything beyond the speed of
the link (45Mb/s). In order to do something beyond that, you need to
load balance per packet.
I wrote up this paper in '96 about how to do this with DS1s.
Keep in mind the Windows TCP scaling limitations, with default window sizes
an RTT of 10ms gives you a maximum of 52Mbps.
http://cisconet.com/traffic-analysis/throughput/104-tcp-throughput-calculati
on-formula.html
I am seeing a lot of this as customer bandwidth demands increase, this is
the
36 matches
Mail list logo
