12.3(2)T - according to command lookup tool
File download using http -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t2/feature/guide/gt_hcopy.html
On Oct 8, 11:49 am, b lam b.mw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I found no copy http command in my routers or switches when I try to
download the
pHey FriendbrI knew things would never be the same again this took all the
extra stress off my back now I am recognized all over the place trust me this
is no jokebra
href=http://easypeasy123.com/TimothyDoyle97.html;http://easypeasy123.com/TimothyDoyle97.html/abrtalk
to you later./p
12.3(24) and 12.3(2)T are different versions, with the T being the
technology train, I can believe it could have some new features that are not
present in the mainline 12.3 release.
---
Howard Leadmon
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
ci...@entrap.de wrote:
Greetings,
I have a 6509 with an X6716-10GE Card equipped with Cisco X2-10GB-LX4 10GE
modules and a Cisco 2960S-48TD-L Switch with two Cisco SFP-10G-LRM
modules.
LX4 and LRM are not compatible. LRM uses a single 1310nm laser,
LX4 uses four lasers around 1310nm and wdm
Hello,
Just want to confirm what should be done. I have a router that resulted in a
bad NPE 225. Had a spare NPE 225 but it wouldn't work for some strange
reason. So had an old NPE 150 laying around so inserted. When the router
came backup noticed that a message flashed nvram corrupt on console.
You should call Cisco TAC and see if you can get contract. I doubt it.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
Hey,
I'm wonder what's up with access to IOS software for EOL/EOS hardware for
example 3600 router serises EOL is 31 dec 2008. Downdload section still
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:51:57 -0500, root net rootne...@gmail.com wrote:
Just want to confirm what should be done. I have a router that resulted
in
a
bad NPE 225. Had a spare NPE 225 but it wouldn't work for some strange
reason. So had an old NPE 150 laying around so inserted. When the router
Thanks for the confirmation. That is the process I was going to take. Do you
know of any reason why that would happen?
rootnet
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 3:58 PM, javier jav...@cisco.com wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:51:57 -0500, root net rootne...@gmail.com wrote:
Just want to confirm what
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 12:00:19 -0500, root net rootne...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation. That is the process I was going to take. Do
you
know of any reason why that would happen?
Looks like the NVRAM got corrupted for some reason, I couldn't tell you
why though.
-jav
I definitely have a back up of the configuration. Whew! But I was just
confused as to why the circuits came up considering the NVRAM corruption.
Miracle of course.
Thanks for your help and information.
rootnet
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote:
On 10/8/11 8:51
Do you have a backup of the config? Assuming you're doing all this just to
migrate to a new box why not use the backup config to build the new box or
migrate? If you are going to fix it why not get the new working NPE and use
the backup to rebuild? I'm not sure password hacking the broken one
Right. I have a backup of config on the flash cards in the system. Anytime a
change is made it's copied to both flash cards and tftp to the server. The
only issue tftp is manual though and sometimes doesn't get done. RANCID from
now on. Haven't had time to setup but now it's a must.
rootnet
On
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 09:29:48AM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
12.3(24) and 12.3(2)T are different versions, with the T being the
technology train, I can believe it could have some new features that are not
present in the mainline 12.3 release.
In the golden times of IOS releases that
Hi,
I was just wondering about the output of:
sh bgp ipv6 unicast neighbors x advertised-routes
sh ip bgp neighbors x advertised-routes
I have configured next-hop-self and think that the Next Hop column
should show the IP of my side of the (e)BGP session.
Quagga and Foundry XMR behave
the output of the command you have executed locally will *always* display the
*real* next-hop!
Execute the sh ip bgp neigh routes/received-routes - depending on config to
*see* what your peer sees as next-hop!
The more-important question *IS* -
why do you have 'next-hop-self' configured?
1)
thx all the reply.
this mean copy http... command depends on diff IOS.
thx again.
On 10/9/11, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 09:29:48AM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
12.3(24) and 12.3(2)T are different versions, with the T being the
technology train, I
16 matches
Mail list logo
