10 GIG cisco compatible SFP in a 3750-X switch.
we started to see this error message after a fibre break and repair:
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te4/1/2: Tx power high alarm;
Operating value: 0.6 dBm, Threshold value: 0.0 dBm
Cant see how the TX power can go high? any ideas?
On 21/08/12 11:13, marc williams wrote:
10 GIG cisco compatible SFP in a 3750-X switch.
we started to see this error message after a fibre break and repair:
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te4/1/2: Tx power high alarm; Operating
value: 0.6 dBm, Threshold value: 0.0 dBm
Cant see how the TX
Marc,
Perhaps it was right on the limit of max receive threshold and they
repaired a splice that was dodgy to start with increasing the signal.
Patrick
Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:13:48AM +0100, marc williams wrote:
10 GIG cisco compatible SFP in a 3750-X switch.
we started to see this error
Put a real optical power meter on the fibers and adjust with pads as
needed to get your levels within specs.
On 8/21/12 4:37 AM, Patrick Cole z...@amused.net wrote:
Marc,
Perhaps it was right on the limit of max receive threshold and they
repaired a splice that was dodgy to start with
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:13 AM, marc williams mar...@me.com wrote:
10 GIG cisco compatible SFP in a 3750-X switch.
we started to see this error message after a fibre break and repair:
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te4/1/2: Tx power high alarm; Operating
value: 0.6 dBm, Threshold value:
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 06:13 -0700, Wayne Tucker wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:13 AM, marc williams mar...@me.com wrote:
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te4/1/2: Tx power high alarm; Operating
value: 0.6 dBm, Threshold value: 0.0 dBm
Too much signal can cause receiver saturation,
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 00:15 +, henry.hua...@yahoo.es wrote:
Currently we are testing Nexus7K, and we need to configure VRF-Lite
and have a model CentraServices.
Is possible this feature?
My unqualified guess is that it's possible, though I'm not sure what you
would win compared to other
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:26:50PM +, John Brown wrote:
Put a real optical power meter on the fibers and adjust with pads as
needed to get your levels within specs.
That's *RX* power. Not TX power. TX power is something that is measured
inside the SFP - an the question how can TX
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 06:13 -0700, Wayne Tucker wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:13 AM, marc williams mar...@me.com wrote:
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te4/1/2: Tx power high alarm; Operating
value: 0.6 dBm,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:13 AM, marc williams mar...@me.com wrote:
10 GIG cisco compatible SFP in a 3750-X switch.
we started to see this error message after a fibre break and repair:
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te4/1/2: Tx power high alarm; Operating
value: 0.6 dBm, Threshold value:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:26:50PM +, John Brown wrote:
Put a real optical power meter on the fibers and adjust with pads as
needed to get your levels within specs.
That's *RX* power. Not TX power. TX power is
Hi list,
Today one of our 7600 transit router was under dos attack and we saw
serious performance degradation.
Cpu was not affected but i saw transit traffic drops.
Firstly i think about pps lookup limit on 3CXL PFC but the command
show platform hardware capacity forwarding shows me that
Hi Marc,
as Gert says they vary over time so this has occurred because either its
putting out more power or the sensor has it wrong. You should test it with
a light meter. It may go faulty, this could be a sign its on its way out.
So, its probably not going to do any damage to a receiving optic,
Hi all,
I've got a pair of stacked 3750X switches running 15.0(1)SE3 and I'm noticing
something funky. On a pair of mirror destination ports, I'm seeing output
drops appear and disappear in the CLI output of 'show interface' at random
intervals. What I mean by this is, after clearing counters
Thanks Oliver for checking on that. Not a critical issue at this point
since it is not impacting service.
Thanks Andy for your help and input too.
-Lee
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
oboeh...@cisco.com wrote:
Andy/Lee,
I am seeing these entries in my logs
15 matches
Mail list logo
