Hi allI was wondering about the below output , when i get the no reply , does
that mean that i faced a change in the MTU through the path?Can i detetct MTU
vlaue through the path if configured ?
[root@core ~]# tracepath -n www.facebook.com 1: 172.16.2.225 0.135ms pmtu
1500 1:
Hi,
Warning: The CLI will be deprecated soon
'enable secret 5 $x/'
Please move to 'enable secret password' CLI
Any suggestions on how to get around this - I don't really want the
password lying around in plain text...
the password shouldnt be lying around in
On 11/27/2012 03:40 AM, Kell, Jeff wrote:
We're doing an eval on some PowerConnect 7048P switches, and have run
into spanning tree issues. They don't like PVST, but will spit out
STP that in theory will revert a Cisco to STP (is this process
contagious? or limited to the upstream?).
The STP
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:30:00AM +, Phil Mayers wrote:
Normally I'm not a big fan of proprietary protocols, but MST is so
awesomely sucky for Campus environments (map all your VLANs to
instances before you start, and never change it - yeah, right!) that we
mandate Cisco
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 10:12 +0200, M K wrote:
I was wondering about the below output , when i get the no reply ,
does that mean that i faced a change in the MTU through the path?Can i
detetct MTU vlaue through the path if configured ?
snip
You're really not making it easy for anyone with that
On 27/11/2012 9:30 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
Normally I'm not a big fan of proprietary protocols, but MST is so
awesomely sucky for Campus environments (map all your VLANs to
instances before you start, and never change it - yeah, right!) that we
mandate Cisco compatible PVST in all our edge.
On 27/11/12 12:27, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
What vendors, other than Cisco, support some form of Rapid-PVST? I
believe Arista do on their switches - are there any others? If it's
Extreme, Foundry, HP in older firmware (newer firmware dropped it in
favour of MST, IIRC - sigh). I think it's
Hey guys,
I have a Cisco 2821 - System image file is
flash:c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T.bin
and a 2851 - System image file is
flash:c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T2.bin
Same exact IOS.. infact, the 2851's IOS was copied fromt the 2821.
===
*On the 2821 I can:*
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:00:17AM +1100, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Anyone know what is going on here that just saving a copy of the config
will want to wipe the flash?
The built-in flash of the classic routers can not erase individual
files, but only erase all-in-once, so it will ask you
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:27:08PM +1100, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
What vendors, other than Cisco, support some form of Rapid-PVST? I
Juniper does, both on MX not-so-switches and on EX.
believe Arista do on their switches - are there any others? If it's
proprietary, did Arista license
Does the 2851 have 'file verify auto' configured?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 8:00 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 2851
Hi!
I have stumpled across a wierd problem, and would like some input on
where to dig for the answer :-)
My setup looks like this... All links are routed directly on the
interface (/31), no MPLS over SVI.
XX-ro-test-02 (ME3600X) -- XX-ro-test-01 (ME3600X) --
XX-ro-core-01 (ASR9K) --
Nope.
show run all | i verify
nothing... on the 2821 and the 2851.
*
*
*Skeeve Stevens, CEO - *eintellego Pty Ltd
ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/eintellego ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau
I know what it did... the question was WHY between a 2821 and 2851 it acts
differently.
*
*
*Skeeve Stevens, CEO - *eintellego Pty Ltd
ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/eintellego ;
What does the sh l2vpn bridge-domain det or sh l2vpn bridge-domain int det
says?
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Claes Jansson
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:50 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Here is the output, currently running from XX-ro-test-01 switch, not
XX-ro-test-02 as in the initial output.
//Claes
#
# ME3600X
#
XX-ro-test-01#sh mpls l2transport vc detail
Local interface: Vl444 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 444 up
Interworking type is Ethernet
Destination address:
Hi All,
Just experienced a load of these on one of our 6500/Sup-7203BXL units:
15:13:01.373 GMT: %ALIGN-3-SPURIOUS: Spurious memory access made at 0x40D42728
reading 0x8
15:13:01.373 GMT: %ALIGN-3-TRACE: -Traceback= 40D42728 40D425B4 40D42618
418D8C74 40306030 40306970 4030A2FC 4313B13C
On 27/11/12 16:21, Robert Williams wrote:
Hi All,
Just experienced a load of these on one of our 6500/Sup-7203BXL
units:
I've seen those occasionally. We reliably get them just after a reload.
I think they're often cosmetic.
So we’ve never had this before (we have a lot of these in
On Nov 27, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Robert Williams wrote:
Any advice or pointers appreciated!
So, when you see these alignment errors or tracebacks, they are always a
software defect. Typically this is something doing bogus pointer math, but the
event was non-fatal. (As compared to an
On 11/27/12 5:00 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Hey guys,
[snip]
===
*On the 2851 I cant:*
BDR-A#copy run q
Destination filename [q]?
Erase flash: before copying? [confirm]
Erasing the flash filesystem will remove all files! Continue? [confirm]
Erasing device...
I need to be able to send a magic packet over three layer 3 hops. Can this
be done? all I'm finding is an ip directed broadcast on a simple layer 3
switch.
How do you do it over multiple router hops?
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On (2012-11-27 11:44 -0800), Scott Voll wrote:
I need to be able to send a magic packet over three layer 3 hops. Can this
be done? all I'm finding is an ip directed broadcast on a simple layer 3
switch.
You send it to L3 broadcast address, which will make the edge router send
it as l2
Just curious, is the VLAN mapping to instances the big issue you guys have
with MST? In our deployments we used pretty large ranges to cover growth,
and mapped purposes such as L2-only VLANs (no SVI), servers, users, VoIP,
etc into separate instances, worked pretty solidly. Except when Nexus
Hello,
MST is a really good ***not*** proprietary protocol.. You just need to
understand how it works and how you can interconnect your regions all
together (not very straightforward I agree)
If you just have independent Layer 2 area's, you can create something like
that (on all your layer 2
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:22:27PM -0500, Chuck Church wrote:
Just curious, is the VLAN mapping to instances the big issue you guys have
with MST? In our deployments we used pretty large ranges to cover growth,
and mapped purposes such as L2-only VLANs (no SVI), servers, users, VoIP,
etc
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:11:18PM +0100, Nicolas KARP wrote:
MST is a really good ***not*** proprietary protocol.. You just need to
understand how it works and how you can interconnect your regions all
together (not very straightforward I agree)
If you just have independent Layer 2
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback people, we'll log a TAC for it anyway if it may help
locate the bug - but won't rush for a reload now since it seems to be
performing just fine. It's set to reload with SXJ4, so it will boot that in the
next available window for it.
Cheers again!
Robert Williams
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:55:23PM -0500, Tim Durack wrote:
Thanks, that gives me something to look at. (C6K running 12.2(33)SXI6.)
(I'm curious to hear how you get this solved in the end. Something
new to
--- On Tue, 11/27/12, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
From: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Wake on Lan over layer 3 hops
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2012, 12:02 PM
On (2012-11-27 11:44 -0800), Scott
Voll wrote:
I need to be able to send a magic
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 13:55 -0800, Randy wrote:
umm..since it is over three L3 hops, wouldn't OP also need -
ip helper-address broadcast ip of dest_subnet at the source in
addition to the above?
Have the WoL management station use the subnet broadcast address as
destination instead of the
I'm trying to configure a remote office and have run into a roadblock that
I'm hoping someone will be able to help with. I have configured a few
remote VPNs using ASA's in the past but always on pre 8.3 code without any
issues...so I'm sure its just something minor that I'm missing.
The setup is
Thanks all. it ended up being the ACL didn't include the WoL server
Scott
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 13:55 -0800, Randy wrote:
umm..since it is over three L3 hops, wouldn't OP also need -
ip helper-address broadcast ip
As Gert says - I understand mst just fine, thanks. It's just completely
unsuitable for our needs, and by the sound of it, others too.
It's also a solution looking for a problem. Even puny 600mhz cpu in sup720 can
handle vast numbers of vports with no appreciable load, afaict.
I'm sure there
I suspect the answer is no, but is there a 64-bit uptime value available via
snmp in IOS? Specifically on older gear like a 3550?
The 32-bit counter wrapping at 470-some days caused some mild panic.
Thanks,
Charles
--
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet
34 matches
Mail list logo
