Yes, you should be able to do that, but on 3560/3750 I think there's a
limitation, it's not going to show the output of show policy-map interface
correctly. You can use show mls qos int g0/4 instead - it should give you a
view of whats going on...
Another thing, By default qos is disabled on
But Oran does not seem receive from Algiers any of its 6 CLNS neighbors
(and that includes the server):
I'd check the ISIS database on Oran to see whether it received an LSP from
each of the Algiers.
Than you can check for the verbose output to see whether the particular LSP
contains all
Hi Adam,
thanks for the quick answer.
About the ES role of the server: Alcatel confirmed that their servers
indeed need to be configured as ISes (which I agree sounds strange).
By each of the Algiers, you mean that I should see rtrnal01 more than
once in the list below, like rtrmar01 and
Hello all,
We are currently troubleshooting an old, badly-documented, non-supported,
CLNS/IS-IS network (for management of Alcatel NEs).
One of the issues we have identified is IS-IS routes not being announced by
one router to another (this might or might not explain the overall
the command is show mrib route rate. I've forgot to add rate to the end
tp# show mfib route rate 233.88.168.176
IP Multicast Forwarding Rates
Source Address, Group Address
HW Forwarding Rates: bps In/pps In/bps Out/pps Out
(x.x.x.x 233.88.168.176)
bps_in /pps_in /bps_out /pps_out
1898751 / 175
I'm sorry to confuse you I thought there are more ALG routers
On ORA you can see that ALG originated and advertised 3 LSPs
I see you mentioned some LSPs are not being propagated I'm thinking maybe
some area discrepancy in the net id
Please note the 49. or 47. should be the same on
I have an issue where I can get traffic to pass from HDQ to two branch offices
over our ipsec/gre tunnels even though the tunnels appear to be UP. The HDQ is
a 2811, branch 1 is a home office using an 871W and branch 2 runs a 2801
router.
I initially had HDQ working fine with the 871W
On 14/01/2013 14:59, false wrote:
I initially had HDQ working fine with the 871W (Branch-1) but when I
configured branch2 (2801), they both broke.
Can you ping the endpoints of each tunnel?
Nick
The tunnels appear to be up
but traffic is not routing across them. The two 2801 routers run
My google foo let me down on this one, so I thought maybe someone here would
know the answer
I'm specifically interested in integrated services routers and me3600x/cx
Appreciate any pointers
Thanks upfront
adam
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Sh mfib route rate
Thanks!
Aaron
From: Erçin TORUN [mailto:ercinto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 6:18 AM
To: John Neiberger
Cc: Aaron; Adam Vitkovsky; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] show command for active multicast kbps rate
the command is show mrib
Isn't that the tc value? I don't believe tc (time interval) is able to be
directly configured but rather indirectly configured via bc and/or cir
values within the mqc contracts and such.
tc=bc/cir
something about a policing/shaping value of 10 ms or 125 ms rings a bell but
I don't know for sure
Hi list,
suppose you have two n7ks (F2 modules) connected to each other (vpc) and
several FEXes directly connected to them. Now, is it neccesary/possible
to configure any qos-related stuff on the link between fex and n7k? I
was not successful with that. I read somewhere that there are pause
Nick,
Are you referring to the real public ip addresses? Or the Tunnel 172.16.x.x
addresses?
Originally, the real public ip addresses could all ping each other but right
now I cannot ping the public peers. I can't even ping anything on the internet
from the 871W (Branch-1) and it doesn't
Update. More data.
If I remove the crypto map for Branch-2 (vpnmap 31) then the tunnel for
Branch-1 (crypto map 10) comes back up. It apears that having both crypto maps
like below causes int fa0/1 to not be aware of what traffic to send down what
tunnel. See example of problematic config
The four ports on the Cisco Nexus 7000 Series switch that connect to the
uplink ports are fabric ports. Only QoS policies can be configured on the
server-facing FEX ports. Currently, queuing on the FEX interfaces is not
supported.
Hi,
I want to add VPN support to a cisco 7200 (w/ NPE300). Use case would
be secure remote management (of the 7200 and other gear at the site)
from a Linux-based computer.
Pretty much my only requirement would be that the VPN is usable out of
the box with standard Linux tools or the open-source
Sorry, it seems the title somehow got lost.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Markus H hauschild.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to add VPN support to a cisco 7200 (w/ NPE300). Use case would
be secure remote management (of the 7200 and other gear at the site)
from a Linux-based computer.
On 14/01/2013 18:38, false wrote:
I'm pretty sure I remember doing it this way several years ago. What changes
need to be made to allow these multiple crypto maps and using just one crypto
map tag on fa0/1 (isp interface)?
This looks wrong:
access-list 141 permit gre any any
When the
You could forget supporting the VPN on the 7200 and run an openvpn
tunnel between a Linux host at the site and one where you are, a simple p2p
would work between the two servers (I use an inexpensive Linux plug server
as its only management traffic), it would be secure as far as the wan is
I have a 2960s-48fps-l and when I inserted the flex stack module I get:
%PLATFORM-6-FLEXSTACK_UNSUPPORTED_MODULE: Unsupported FlexStack module
inserted in Switch 1. C2960S-F-STACK
Is this not supported? I'm running 15.0.2se1. How do I get it talking to
the other switches?
TIA
Scott
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 18:58:18, Scott Voll wrote:
Subject: [c-nsp] Fwd: 2960s-48fps-l flex stack
I have a 2960s-48fps-l and when I inserted the flex stack module I get:
%PLATFORM-6-FLEXSTACK_UNSUPPORTED_MODULE: Unsupported FlexStack module
inserted in Switch 1. C2960S-F-STACK
Looks
Hi,
We are looking to install cisco switches to feed an apartment complex with
internet.
Each unit has a Cat5e cable back to a common room.
We have our own fiber into the common room that goes back to our pop.
We want to provide 10/100/1000 service options to the tenants.
The backhaul today
How long is a piece of string? You need to work out your architecture first
- then you can find your switches.
Are you sure you want L3 functionality in the common room, or would it not
be enough to run the SVIs from the PoP?
I would probably use a 2960S in the common rooms, and run VSS 6500s in
The reason I suggested the 2960s is as I would probably not do layer3 to
the edge - it would probably be too expensive . Does IPv6 with 24x SVIs and
CoPP work on a ME3600? I may use something like an ME though if John is
using MPLS... Really depends on what the rest of the network looks like,
what
24 matches
Mail list logo
