Re: [c-nsp] QinQ and Bridging

Hi Garry, On the ASR1K I think you need to use the EFP type of config for the L2 bridging to work: interface GigabitEthernet0/1 service instance 61400 ethernet encapsulation dot1Q 614 second-dot1q 201 bridge-group 201 adam Adam Vitkovsky IP Engineer T: 0333 006 5936

Re: [c-nsp] GRE fragmentation and ASR9001

Hi Gert, There are counters suggesting that IPv4 frames are punted to LC CPU to be fragmented. sh controllers np descriptions location 0/x/cpu0 RSV_PUNT_IP_MTU_EXCEEDED L3 Egress IP packets that exceed the interface MTU. IPv4 frames are punted to LC CPU

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 Microbursts

Dear George, The drops that I saw was due to the tail drop of the queue. I understood that the drops was caused by a burst during a brief space of time. I saw the queue depth with packets before I saw the drop counter incremented. I think that the issue are the microbursts, but how can I

[c-nsp] GRE fragmentation and ASR9001

Hi, my google fu is failing me - so apologies if this is in easily findable documentation... I want (need) to connect two ASR9001s over a GRE tunnel across the public Internet (= outside MTU 1500), but need to provide a larger inner MTU (~1600). So, fragmentation and reassembly required. Easy

Re: [c-nsp] Anycast GW for L2 subnet

Hi Tim, Adam Vitkovsky IP Engineer T: 0333 006 5936 E: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk W: www.gamma.co.uk This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it

Re: [c-nsp] GRE fragmentation and ASR9001

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Gert Doering wrote: Indeed... it might be implemented eventually, but today it isn't, so if you turn it on, your packets will be destroyed in creative ways :-) But I'm relieved that it's not only me who can't find a formal word on this. With the kind of router that ASR9k

Re: [c-nsp] dai / dhcp snooping bug

hey, Another idea would be to see if I could configure the dhcp server to just ignore unicast requests (easier than putting ACL's on the the switches). You can configure ACL on the server as well (read: iptables or so). All relayed packets will use router interface IP as source address (at

Re: [c-nsp] GRE fragmentation and ASR9001

Hi, On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 09:43:47AM +, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: IPV4_FRAG_TUNNEL Punt Not implemented by ucode -this one actually concerns me -does it mean it's going to be slow, or punted to RP, or just dropped -not sure what I should make

Re: [c-nsp] dai / dhcp snooping bug

Mike I recently solved an issue a client had with a very similar setup and the same symptoms. They had a very complex PBR setup and the unicasts in the renew process got misplaced . tis 11 aug. 2015 kl 00:40 skrev Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com: On 08/10/2015 12:37 PM, Gert Doering

Re: [c-nsp] GRE fragmentation and ASR9001

Hi Gert, Adam Vitkovsky IP Engineer T: 0333 006 5936 E: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk W: www.gamma.co.uk This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it

[c-nsp] MPLS router-ID

Hi all I have the below case I have one of my PEs already configured with a router-id (which is my private loopback interface) Am trying to establish xconnect with my uplink provider (which uses Juniper) The SP insisted to use public IP address for LDP neighborship , I cannot change my router-id

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS router-ID

On 11/08/2015 14:39, Mohammad Khalil wrote: I have one of my PEs already configured with a router-id (which is my private loopback interface) Am trying to establish xconnect with my uplink provider (which uses Juniper) The SP insisted to use public IP address for LDP neighborship

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS router-ID

On 11 August 2015 at 14:39, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote: I have one of my PEs already configured with a router-id (which is my private loopback interface) I assume you mean LDP router-id? Am trying to establish xconnect with my uplink provider (which uses Juniper) The SP

Re: [c-nsp] me3800x IOS

Hi Folks, Thanks for the recommendations - very helpful. I meant to reply earlier, but I'm sure you all know how that goes sometimes. Tim Densmore On 7/27/2015 10:25 AM, Tim Densmore wrote: Hi Folks, I'm looking for recommendations for the best (least buggy) IOS for the 3800x. If anyone

Re: [c-nsp] issues with Cisco 12413 12.0(32)SY15 per packet load balancing

On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Sathiyan D MPLS_NOC wrote: Hi, We are trying to do per packet load balancing for cisco 12413 router with IOS of 12.0(32)SY15. As this is active network, whether enabling per packet load balancing will cause huge upsurge in CPU util and whether any issues will come

[c-nsp] issues with Cisco 12413 12.0(32)SY15 per packet load balancing

Hi, We are trying to do per packet load balancing for cisco 12413 router with IOS of 12.0(32)SY15. As this is active network, whether enabling per packet load balancing will cause huge upsurge in CPU util and whether any issues will come enabling per packet load balancing With Regards, Sathiyan D