[c-nsp] 3750 stack

are no longer named fa*/*/* and will become gi*/*/*. Are there any other issues i'm going to encounter? Kind Regards James Greig ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] 3750 stack

Hi Matt, That's great, thanks for the advice. Regards, James Greig On 24/08/2010 12:37, Matt Bennett wrote: Hi James, You could power off and un-provision the old switch letting you keep the rest of the config (but losing the port configs from the removed switch), otherwise your new

Re: [c-nsp] compact flash modules for Sup720-3bxl..

Hi, Just a note - we're using a 4GB CF in our sup32. Not sure on the make/model of the CF though I think it's a sandisk. James Greig -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz Sent: 26 February 2010 22

Re: [c-nsp] SecureACS Appliance AD Authentication

and we cannot fault it. James Greig -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alan Buxey Sent: 26 February 2010 18:32 To: Ryan Lambert; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SecureACS Appliance AD

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 problem

Hi Pete, Thanks for your response, I think you've confirmed our suspicions. We'll source another chassis:) James G -Original Message- From: Pete Templin [mailto:peteli...@templin.org] Sent: 24 January 2010 19:00 To: James Greig Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6509

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 problem

Anyone else have any other thoughts on this? Could it be a bug or a faulty backplane on the 6500 chassis? James G -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Greig Sent: 22 January 2010 21:18 To: 'Alan Buxey

[c-nsp] 6509 problem

to 001b.533a.7b8b 4.5 12.2(18r)SX2 12.2(33)SXI2 Ok Kind Regards James Greig ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 problem

[mailto:a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk] Sent: 22 January 2010 21:03 To: James Greig Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6509 problem Hi, *Feb 28 22:29:29.055: %DIAG-SP-3-MAJOR: Module 1: Online Diagnostics detected a Major Error. Please use 'show diagnostic result target' to see test results. what

Re: [c-nsp] 'Simple' BGP multi homing

Hi Chris, Just out of interest, what model routers are you intending to use to achieve this? Also, are you aiming to load balance between the two peers? James Greig - Original Message - From: ChrisSerafin ch...@chrisserafin.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, May 19

[c-nsp] Dropped packets and poor performance

James Greig ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/