Re: [c-nsp] 3750-E + CVR-X2-SFP10G + SFP-10G-SR = disappearing media

-Original Message- From: Holemans Wim [mailto:wim.holem...@ua.ac.be] Sent: 10 May, 2010 23:13 To: Matthew White (MAWHI); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 3750-E + CVR-X2-SFP10G + SFP-10G-SR = disappearing media We have a similar setup but with X2 interfaces, so

[c-nsp] 3750-E + CVR-X2-SFP10G + SFP-10G-SR = disappearing media

Greetings, I have an open TAC case about this but I figured I'd ask here as well. I recently installed 10 3750-Es in 5 2-member stacks. Each stack has 2 uplinks to a 6509-VSS. I'm using X2 to SFP+ converters and 10G SFP+ modules on both ends of the links between the stacks and the VSS. In each

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 line card mounted cable management bars (??)

copper cards. Lots of modular solutions, cable assembles, patch panels, available. Panduit makes a cable assemblies for this purpose. Might not be exactly what the OP was looking for, but it may help. http://bit.ly/bT6Nfd ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] Help !!

If you need branch to branch communications you might want to consider DMVPN (Dynamic Multipoint VPN). cf. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6658/index.html -mtw -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf

Re: [c-nsp] Router advice

I don't know if the 7201 will accept PVDMs, so if you need to do voice xcoding on your box that may be a show stopper. According to Cisco's marketing speak the new 2900s will do up to 75Mbps with services such as security, mobility, WAN Optimization However it is 2U. -mtw

Re: [c-nsp] Restricting VPN connections to company hardware?

Hi Scott, Certificate based authentication can meet these needs. This document is just a starting point -- the client certificate installation procedure is onerous. If you have a MS environment it's easier to push out certs with group policy objects than making your end users download and

Re: [c-nsp] 2600XM usability?

Hi Graham, Of course YMMV, however I just replaced a 2691XM that was doing DMVPN duties running EIGRP (~350 routes). The unit was equiped with a cypto card and max throughput was around 10Mbps. At peak traffic times the CPU would hit 65/70% and this is without running QoS. So, from my

Re: [c-nsp] 2600XM usability?

Hi Graham, I think a 2821 with enough memory would do the trick. Even new, the ones without the AIM module are fairly inexpensive. -mtw -Original Message- From: Graham Wooden [mailto:gra...@g-rock.net] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 5:08 PM To: Matthew White; cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c

Re: [c-nsp] Enclosed rack with filtered air

I've had good success with Hoffman cabinets: http://www.hoffmanonline.com/product_catalog/product_detail.aspx?cat_1=34cat_2=2410cat_3=81607catID=81607itemID=69583 You can get them with or without integrated AC units. I can put you in touch with a reputable manufacturer's rep if you need further

Re: [c-nsp] 720x VXR -12V Sensor

Roy, I encountered a similar issue with a 7204VXR + I/O-2FE/E + NPE-225. I worked with TAC and started by replacing both power supplies; no good. This router was due for an NPE-G1 upgrade so I installed the replacement and kept the I/O controller installed; no good. I finally pulled out the

[c-nsp] NBAR + QoS - policing kills class-default traffic

Sincerely, Matthew White Sr. Network Engineer Group IT, Operations, Network Vestas Wind Systems A/S T: +1 503 327 2320 M: +1 503 927 5728 ma...@vestas.com Company reg. name: Vestas Wind Systems A/S This e-mail is subject to our e-mail disclaimer statement. Please refer to www.vestas.com/legal