However, now when I apply a created route-map to an interface, it take the
'ip policy route-map' command but nothing appears on configuration for the
SVI. If I apply a non-existent policy map to the same interface, the
configuration shows up on the SVI.
By route-map I assume you actually
Hi,
I need to configure a Cisco 3750 with route maps and so I upgraded from an
old LAN base image to IP Services (c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE8.bin)
and changed the SDM profile to 'access'
sh sdm prefer
The current template is aggregator access IPv4 template.
The selected template optimizes
On 7 Nov 2011, at 17:00, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote:
That sounds like an IOS bug.
What does sh idprom int Tex/y | inc endor say for one of the non-Cisco
parts, compared to a Cisco part?
Mystery solved: without going into the full long story, 75oC ambient
temperature in a
After seeing how much money there is to be saved from using third party optics
instead of Cisco branded ones, we finally bought a few to try. We have
encountered no issues with using 10Gbps xenpaks, we plugged them in and they
just worked. However, we did notice that DOM support was missing for
I am intending to set up a tunnel to demonstrate the MTU blackholing problem
and then a solution using increased link MTU size - does anyone know of some
naughty sites/companies that are good for demonstrating this blackholing?
Ta,
Michael.
___
Ta for this info.
On 29 Mar 2011, at 12:15, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 29/03/2011 09:29, Michael Robson wrote:
I have a new Macbook pro running Snow Leopard that i want to be able to
connect to Cisco console ports and before getting the Mac I thought that
this would be trivial; but I see now
I have a new Macbook pro running Snow Leopard that i want to be able to connect
to Cisco console ports and before getting the Mac I thought that this would be
trivial; but I see now that people can have problems finding USB-to-Serial
leads that actually work with their Macs. I have tried a
Many thanks for the replies, they confirmed my suspicions and provided some
very useful points and suggestions.
Michael.
--
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
I have a test network of three Cisco 6500(Sup720s) running SXI5 connected
together in a triangle. Each is iBGPed to the others using loopbacks advertised
around this testbed using OSPF and Label switching is also turned on. I then
have two clients connected one to router A and the second to
Is it true that the when subsequent layers of labels are added to MPLS
traffic, the EXP field is copied to the top most label from the next
one downward (this is on a 6500 using LAN-based cards)?
Thanks,
Michael.
--
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On 10 Mar 2010, at 18:56, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
Michael,
For QOS:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/con
figuration/guide/mplsqos.html
For TE (and MPLS in general) check:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/con
Can someone who is familiar with EoMPLS on 6500s running SXI IOS and LAN cards
tell me to what extent QoS and TE is supported (specifically for EoMPLS)?
Ta,
Michael
--
Michael Robson | Tel: +44 (0) 161 275 6113
Networks| Fax: +44 (0) 161 275 6120
Net North West | Email
On 29 Jan 2010, at 17:07, David Prall wrote:
So XP doesn't support IPv6 DHCP, nor do they support IPv6 DNS. Not sure
about the macintosh.
and I thought I was being clever pointing fec0:0:0:::1, 2 and 3 to real
DNSv6 servers and finding the add dns from within netsh only to be thwarted
OK so looking at/listening to various recommendations, when allocating IPV6
addresses, stateless auto-configuration with DHCPv6 used to dish out the DNS
servers and domain looks the most appealing. Since the IOS version we are using
on our 6500s doesn't support IPV6 DHCP relaying
I was convinced that our 2851s would support L2TPv3 and the ipbase version, but
two different images (the newer being 124-18e ipbase) will not accept the
xconnect command: what am I missing here?
Ta.
Michael.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
It's been a while since I worked with IPV6 and I am now once again plunging
myself into this feckless world and was wondering if a couple of holes had now
been plugged. What is the accepted way in IPV6 land to dish out IPV6 DNS server
addresses (am I correct in saying that if you make use of
What is the added benefit of running an EoMPLS pseudowire across an
MPLS cloud over an L2TPv3 tunnel over the same cloud?
Michael
--
Michael Robson | Tel: +44 (0) 161 275 6113
Networks| Fax: +44 (0) 161 275 6120
Net North West | Email: michael.rob...@manchester.ac.uk
to 9216B (using the
mtu interface command), however, if I was trying to set the MTU an a
switchported interface, then the mtu command would only allow me to
change the MTU to the value defined in the global system jumbmtu
command - this is a feature not a bug.
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael
I have a 6509 (with Sup720-3B) that contains 2 x WS-X6704-10GE blades
where I am trying to set the MTU to be 1504 on each of these
interfaces. On one blade it will only allow me to set the MTU to 9216
if the interface is a switchport, the 1504 MTU size only becomes an
option when it is
Michael
--
Michael Robson | Tel: +44 (0) 161 275 6113
Senior Network Engineer | Fax: +44 (0) 161 275 6120
Net North West | Email: michael.rob...@manchester.ac.uk
On 30 Apr 2009, at 16:08, Dale W. Carder wrote:
On Apr 30, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Michael Robson wrote:
We
We have a selection of ZR modules (XENPAK-10GB-ZR) in 6500s that we
are using to drive some links at 10Gbps and I have recently noticed
that all receive values (as reported via the sh int te x/y trans
command) are lower than what Cisco specify as the minimum allowed
values for those
-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michael Robson
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:28 PM
To: ch...@lavin-llc.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] UDP-helper problem
Yes there is a route to a.b.c.d and yes we can ping the DHCP server
from everywhere, including the new sup.
On 4
On 5 Mar 2009, at 10:24, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:00 +, Michael Robson wrote:
I have recently moved the routing of a subnet from an old sup2/msfc2
6500 (Version 12.1(26)E8, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)) to a newer sup3/
msfc3 6500 (Version 12.2(18)SXF13, RELEASE SOFTWARE
Make sure u dont have no service dhcp in your config.
...
AFAIK this forwarding requires the device to have service dhcp,
which
is default. Do you have no service dhcp defined maybe?
...
Ahh the penny finally drops, thanks. Yes the router had no service
DHCP set. I had wrongly thought
I have recently moved the routing of a subnet from an old sup2/msfc2
6500 (Version 12.1(26)E8, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)) to a newer sup3/
msfc3 6500 (Version 12.2(18)SXF13, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)). On the old
router the udp-helper command worked fine, but on the new router I can
see the DHCP
Yes there is a route to a.b.c.d and yes we can ping the DHCP server
from everywhere, including the new sup.
On 4 Mar 2009, at 18:54, ch...@lavin-llc.com wrote:
On Wed Mar 4 8:00 , Michael Robson sent:
I have recently moved the routing of a subnet from an old sup2/msfc2
6500 (Version
Guys, thanks for the clarification; but now further questions leading
on from this. My understanding is that by default (without overriding)
if you are redistributing routes from BGP into OSPF on the router and
some routes have been learned via iBGP, then these iBGP-learned
routes will
I used to think that I had a handle on when the default information
originate command was needed, but I have recently seen working config.
that pokes a finger in my eye of understanding, where some bad Ciscco
document caused further blurring; and so some questions
- Should the
I am looking for a solution to be able to connect OOB to our sup720 6500s
via their console ports and also be able remotely to interrupt power to
affect a reboot should they need it. I have seen several solutions for the
remote consoling side, but because their power supplies are 16A have only
The servertech PT45 has all you need below is link to
details. There power relays can go up to 20A as far as I know.
They provide out of band access via dialup and can give
console access and power management.
http://servertech.com/products/RemotePowerManagement/SentryCom
manderPT45
/
presumably you've reset the peer, made sure mcast routing is
enabled, any other obvious things.
Thanks for the reply; yes I tried all the usual. Strangely, it all started
working sometime over the weekend, as if by magic.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
Michael Robson, | Tel: 0161 275 6113
nlri... option on our 12.2(18)SXF4
routers.
Anyone any ideas?
Ta,
Michael.
Sun, May 27, 2007 at 10:36:14AM +0100, Michael Robson:
We have a mBGP core routers(Cisco 6500, sup720s) that peer
separately
for multicast and unicast routes (using address families)
and a site
add the corresponding multicast MAC to the port facing the router?
Could any answers please be copied to my direct email as well as the list,
as I only get digests.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
Michael Robson, | Tel: 0161 275 6113
Networks, | Fax: 0161 275 6040
University
33 matches
Mail list logo