I wouldn’t disagree
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications
(Commsworld Ltd T/A)
T: +44 (0) 330 121 1000
www.fluency.net.uk <http://www.fluency.net.uk/>
n...@fluency.net.uk <mailto:char...@fluency.net.uk>
On 27/01/2016, 19:12, "cisco-nsp on behalf of Aaron&
-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
Sw2
send to Sw3 but Sw3 can't send back?
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Nick Ryce
n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk wrote:
Hi,
I’m tearing my hair out with this one and can’t figure out how to resolve it.
I have 3 switches that have a BGP signalled VPLS with customer routers
that, I'd suggest moving to static vpls and skip that release until
it's fixed.
Also, with S1a, look at CSCtl54835 and verify or else your isis adjacencies
will break.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 18, 2013, at 10:08 PM, Nick Ryce
n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk wrote:
Just found 1 switch
Hi,
I’m tearing my hair out with this one and can’t figure out how to resolve it.
I have 3 switches that have a BGP signalled VPLS with customer routers hanging
off the end of all 3 ( one switch has 2 cpe )
All have the RD 56595:4 and RT 56595:4
All pseudo wires are up between the switches
vfi46.226.0.14 4 UP
We are not using targeted ldp at this time. All switches are using rsvp
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 19 Nov 2013, at 00:31, Pshem
Hi Jason,
It sounds very similar. If a bgp session was established direct rather than
via an RR would this fix it I wonder?
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 19 Nov 2013, at 02:02
Doesn’t make a diff if established direct :(
On 19 Nov 2013, at 02:46, Nick Ryce
n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk wrote:
Hi Jason,
It sounds very similar. If a bgp session was established direct rather than
via an RR would this fix it I wonder?
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency
trying 15.3(3)S1a to see
fix works, but that version seems to have introduced CSCuh05321, so I think
that might end badly for you; it did for me :(
On Nov 18, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Nick Ryce
n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk wrote:
Hi,
I’m tearing my hair out with this one and can’t
Hi Guys,
I am trying to to do some basic QoS to prioritise packets marked with DSCP EF
on EFP's but keep getting errors as below:
SW1.WAV-EDI(config-if-srv)#service-policy output Voip
QoS: Invalid target for service-policy
QoS: Configuration errors for policy map Voip
Class-map and policy map
Hi Adam,
Just reached the same conclusion.
Can be applied to the member ports of the channel. Also you can't apply
service policies to EFP's on a port channel either.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 07
Hi Jason,
Just tested this myself.
Only appears to work if the SVI is created and the member statement added
there.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 26/06/2013 02:07, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote
Hi Jason,
It was myself on the packet exchange forum with the issue. After removing
the config and reading the issue resolved itself.
Have you tried removing the full config for the vfi and associated member
ports and re-adding?
Nick
On 21/06/2013 00:37, Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi Samar,
Is the IX traffic and internet traffic on the same vlan?
If its split between 2 you could use service instances on the ports which
can be graphed via snmp.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 11/06
None 304720 46.226.0.10/32 0 Tu0point2point
MAC/Encaps=14/18, MRU=9000, Label Stack{304720}, via Te0/2
A8D0E55DEB3D88F077938CDB8847 4A65
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
From
Hi,
Im having a strange issue with a BGP signalled VPLS on my ME3600. I'm running
15.3.2(s).
The VFI comes up but the virtual circuit stays down with the following error:-
SW1.THN-LON#show mpls L2transport vc 501 detail
Local interface: VFI FLVPLS001 vfi up
Interworking type is Ethernet
Had a call with cisco tac and they managed to get it working by removing
the RD.
No idea why this resolved it. Now to try and get it to working with a
juniper PE.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 16/04
VPLS using BGP signalling is now available so assume multihoming can be
done also.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 23/04/2013 13:44, William Jackson william.jack...@gibtele.com wrote:
So is BGP VPLS multi
Hi Aaron,
The VE ID etc is for BGP signalling.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
From: Aaron aar...@gvtc.commailto:aar...@gvtc.com
Date: Monday, 22 April 2013 14:28
To: 'Waris Sagheer (waris)' wa
See the next post when he said it was posted to the wrong thread :)
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 19/04/2013 16:02, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Ryan,
actually i didnt get your point
: 172.16.3.3:512
*i 172.16.3.3:512:VEID-3:Blk-1/136
172.16.3.3 0100 0 ?
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
Apologies the attachment has went through.
ASCII art as below
PE1---PE2PE3
PE1 and PE3 are ME3600's and PE2 is a Juniper SRX.
From PE2 labels are being pushed/popped correctly.
Nick
On 16/04/2013 13:37, Nick Ryce n...@fluency.net.uk wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 x ME3600x running
Its part for the BGP L2VPN NLRI as far as I'm aware.
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 16/04/2013 15:50, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
Anyone know what and why to use this ve stuff? I didn't use it during
my
vpls
Does memory usage not increase by putting all the internet routes in a VRF?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
michalis.bersi...@hq.cyta.gr
Sent: 14 March 2012 09:47
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
standart and IEEE 802.3-2005
clause 43
and does not see any special case for priority=0. Does anybody in the list
familar
enough with LACP to explain me why Cisco IOS XR does not like zero here?
Thanks
--
Dmitry Kiselev
Nick Ryce
Senior Network Engineer
Pulsant Limited
T: 0845
Completely agree. Thanks for the insight.
Nick
On 22 Feb 2012, at 08:22, Bruce Pinsky b...@whack.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Ryce wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I was hoping to have an easy way out from import / export :-)
In the VASI scenarios I've seen, BGP
Hi Guys,
Does anyone know if these type of interfaces can be used without a services
blade? Also is there a specific version of XR required?
I have been scouring documentation and can't really find anything. Would
InterFlex interfaces do the same thing? I am looking to have 1 link in a VRF
Hi Bruce,
I was hoping to have an easy way out from import / export :-)
Nick
On 22 Feb 2012, at 00:21, Bruce Pinsky b...@whack.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Ryce wrote:
Hi Guys,
Does anyone know if these type of interfaces can be used without a
services
Can nfdump/nfsen show useage per AS number as I cannot see anything on their
site?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dobbins, Roland
Sent: 18 January 2012 06:14
To: Cisco NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Flow
Hi MKS,
I believe that card only has a 1G fabric shared between 8 ports each. Therefor
I don't believe you could do 2 simultaneous gig streams as you have suggested.
I may be wrong though ;)
Nick
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Hi Oli,
That's sounds fantastic.
I will give that a go and report back.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:oboeh...@cisco.com]
Sent: 24 November 2011 16:04
To: Nick Ryce; Eric Morin; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] IOS XR BGP
I require
19:17
To: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
Cc: Nick Ryce; Eric Morin; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR BGP
On 11/24/2011 11:04 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
I require the specific to be from IGP.
I have a funny feeling all I need to do is redistribute OSPF into BGP
Hi,
I am moving from Juniper to Cisco ( IOS XR ) and am looking to emulate a
certain feature ( aggregate addressing for BGP )
In Junos I can set routing-options aggregate route x.x.x.x/19 . If there is a
less specific contributing route from IGP then the aggregate is announced
through BGP.
Hi Adam,
That's great thanks.
I had just focused on the summary only part which only summarise less specific
BGP routes.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Vitkovsky, Adam [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com]
Sent: 24 November 2011 12:20
To: Nick Ryce; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE
Still can't get this to work.
I have the network statement and a corresponding aggregate address statement
with as-set appended.
Any other thoughts?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Ryce
Sent
No, I am not introducing IGP into BGP.
All I want to do is that if IGP is lost then the subsequent aggregate routes in
BGP are withdrawn, if that makes sense.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Vitkovsky, Adam [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com]
Sent: 24 November 2011 14:35
To: Nick Ryce
...@corp.xplornet.com]
Sent: 24 November 2011 14:24
To: Nick Ryce; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] IOS XR BGP
I don't know how the as-set piece works, but you need a 'specific' in your BGP
table in order to trigger the aggregate that encompasses that specific. You
don't need a network
Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
Sent: 24 November 2011 15:22
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR BGP
On 24/11/2011 14:38, Nick Ryce wrote:
All I want to do is that if IGP is lost then the subsequent aggregate
routes in BGP are withdrawn, if that makes sense.
You
Hi,
I'm trying to write a route-policy that will prepend a customers' announcement
when they send a certain community. The prepend should be their own AS number
rather than our AS.
I know how to do this is Junos but could anyone point me in the right direction
for IOS XR?
Thanks
Nick
Thanks guys
-Original Message-
From: Arie Vayner (avayner) [mailto:avay...@cisco.com]
Sent: 22 September 2011 12:18
To: Nick Ryce; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] IOS XR RPL
Nick,
I think you can find the following example very similar to what you want to
achieve:
http
Just found prepend as-path most-recent. I assume this is the one I need?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Ryce
Sent: 22 September 2011 11:48
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] IOS
Hi Tim,
Thanks for this. I'm getting in touch with our optic supplier to see if
they have had any other reports of this. Its a chan35 optic to plug into
some DWDM kit. Pity Cisco seem to have omitted this channel from their
optic range or we would have used them.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Network
Hi All,
We have an ASR9006 with some opnext 10Gig optics.
I have set the service unsupported-transceiver option and also set transceiver
permit pid all on the interface.
The interface does not come up and when issuing a show controllers ten0/0/0/1 I
see the following:-
State:
Hi,
Do you need the k9 version of IOS XR in order to set up the ssh server for
secure connections into it? I cant see any command references to enable the
ssh server in the basic 4.1.0 version.
Any help much appreciated.
Nick
--
This email and any files
It makes me die inside that a router of the asr calibre cant have management
access encrypted with ssh without a different software version :(
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:oboeh...@cisco.com]
Sent: 26 August 2011 12:51
To: Nick Ryce; cisco-nsp
Hi,
Does anyone know if the 4948 has the ability to be able to graph traffic
transiting the SVI of a vlan? I know the 3550/3560's are unable to do this?
Nick
--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of
Hi Guys,
Im having some issues with setting up multi area ospf between a j 2320 and a
cisco 1812. I have a funny feeling the issues will be user related.
The j2320 is acting as an abr with backbone area 0.0.0.0 and stub area 0.0.0.1
and advertises a default route into the stub area.
The
Hi Guys,
I have been hunting around trying to find if when using cisco dhcp and option
66 I can use a http url rather than tftp? Within most linux dhcp daemons this
can be done.
Any help greatly appreciated.
Nick
--
This email and any files transmitted
48 matches
Mail list logo