Re: [c-nsp] Can ASR920 handle ip vrf forwarding X combined with tunnel vrf Y on a tunnel interface?

other router, the tunnel started working! Thanks very much! Peter Olsson > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 3:47 PM Peter Olsson wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I have this configuration on a tunnel interface in an ASR920: > > > > interface Tunnel0 > > ip addr

Re: [c-nsp] Can ASR920 handle ip vrf forwarding X combined with tunnel vrf Y on a tunnel interface?

e VLAN in the lab setup. ping and telnet works fine both ways between 10.50.3.1 and 10.50.3.2. Peter Olsson > If this operates like an ASR/ISR4k - Then you can put the tunnel IP in > whatever table you choose. > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Peter Olsson &g

[c-nsp] Can ASR920 handle ip vrf forwarding X combined with tunnel vrf Y on a tunnel interface?

0.3.2 (tbl=6,"TEST" len=48 ttl=254) *Aug 20 11:48:46.955: Tunnel0: Pak Decapsulated on BDI653, ptype 0x800, nw start 0x784A908E, mac start 0x784A9068, datagram size 24 link type 0x7 *Aug 20 11:48:46.956: Tunnel0: GRE decapsulated IP packet (linktype=7, len=24) *Aug 20 11:48:46.956: Tu

[c-nsp] IPsec from Linux to Cisco dynamic-map?

and 10.1.1.1/24 as Remote Network in the Linux. In my google attempts I found some sample configurations between Cisco and Linux, but unfortunately none using dynamic-map. Anyone knows what could be wrong, or how to better debug it? Thanks! -- Peter Olssonp...@leissner.se

[c-nsp] Does 7609 have problems with time-range in QoS?

OFFICEHOURS access-list 112 permit ip host xxx any time-range OTHER_HOURS time-range OFFICEHOURS periodic weekdays 7:00 to 18:00 time-range OTHER_HOURS periodic weekdays 0:00 to 6:59 periodic weekdays 18:01 to 23:59 periodic weekend 0:00 to 23:59 Thanks! -- Peter Olsson

[c-nsp] Is this QoS config possible in 7600 with WS-X6724-SFP?

is that the WAN lines have different bandwidth. Usually 50 Mbps, but some are 100 Mbps. This is why priority configuration per VLAN is preferred. Thanks! -- Peter Olssonp...@leissner.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Solution to %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR, except disable spanning tree?

/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2008-January/046310.html Great thread on the subject. I hadn't seen that, I will read it and check for ideas. Many thanks! Peter Olsson Clinton. Peter Olsson wrote: Two offices have a cisco 3750 each. They connect via a bridged fastethernet service, on non-cisco equipment

[c-nsp] Is port channel between one switch and two other switches possible?

, but this is currently not in the budget. Thanks! -- Peter Olsson[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

[c-nsp] Real performance of 3DES traffic through 2821?

with 1 Gbps Ethernet between them. Each central office has 100 Mbps Ethernet lines to 10-15 branch offices. All traffic is encrypted. We have been considering 2821 or 2851 at the branch offices, and 7600 at the central offices. Thanks! -- Peter Olsson[EMAIL PROTECTED

[c-nsp] 3DES performance of 7304/7606?

Hello! Does anyone know what the 3DES performance of these are: 7304 NSE-100 7304 NSE-150 7606-VPN+-K9 We need 1 Gbps of 3DES traffic. The performance sheet for VPN products end at 7301. Thanks! -- Peter Olsson[EMAIL PROTECTED

[c-nsp] What to do about Not enough DSP resources available for pri-group?

enabling dsp tdm pooling under voice-card 0, but it doesn't help. The IOS in the 3845 is rather old, c3845-advipservicesk9-mz.124-3f, so I will upgrade and try again, but I'm afraid it won't help. Thanks! -- Peter Olsson[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [c-nsp] What equipment can handle 802.1Q Tunneling?

that I couldn't see this information, but now I discovered that not all features are displayed in feature navigator when you are not logged in. I usually don't log in just to check features, but now I see the need. Thanks for opening my eyes! Peter Olsson

[c-nsp] What equipment can handle 802.1Q Tunneling?

anyone have pointers to where/how I should search to find out which low end switches support Q-in-Q? And are there any low end routers that can terminate/strip Q-in-Q tags? Thanks! -- Peter Olsson[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] What equipment can handle 802.1Q Tunneling?

On Sat, 12 May 2007 20:17 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Searching on cisco.com/go/fn for 802.1Q Tunneling returned many results. 3400,3550,3750 surely support it. And 3560. Great, do you also know about 2960? Thanks! -- Peter Olsson[EMAIL PROTECTED