On 10/21/21 1:37 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
When I was moving from 3.x to 17.x (via 16.x and lots of ROMMON, FPGA
and CPLD drama), I recall some licensing agreements that were required
before the box could load the saved configuration. Did any of that pop
up on your console?
I'm talking about
On 10/17/21 3:15 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
From what code did you upgrade, and to what?
Mark.
Hi Mark,
Unfortunately I don't have the exact code and it's possible that I only
upgraded one of them so far. Things got a little confused once I could
no longer access the CLI on the devices.
But
Hi Folks,
I recently upgraded and erased the startup config on a couple of
asr1001-x routers that are being repurposed. Standard procedure, though
this is the first time I have used the 1001-x specifically.
Upon reboot I was expecting a "Router>" prompt, but instead I'm
presented with a
Hi Mike,
Not a Cisco solution, but you might look into a
pfsense/opnsense/ipfire/whatever appliance - either physical or
virtual. Even a UBNT edgerouter can do basic stateful stuff if you have
one lying around.
All of these are inexpensive and (probably?) do what you need done. The
first
? I'm thinking of standard
stuff like a few BGP feeds, IGP, ACLs, QoS and MPLS L2/L3 VPNs. We've
been pretty happy with the asr1004 as a platform, but we're not doing
anything super cutting edge with it, either.
Thanks,
Tim Densmore
___
cisco-nsp mailin
On 6/20/2016 11:38 AM, Satish Patel wrote:
> I have tried that too and got this error.
>
> R1(config-router)#neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx route-map RTBH out
> % "RTBH" used as BGP outbound route-map, tag match not supported
> % not supported match will behave as route-map with no match
>
Not sure about access. That link was posted on the Cisco Learning
Network ages ago when I was still studying for the SPCORE and SPEDGE
tests, and that's what I've always used for images. IIRC I just used my
basic (no entitlements) login to access the files.
Tim Densmore
On 8/17/2015 12:08
Hi Folks,
Thanks for the recommendations - very helpful. I meant to reply
earlier, but I'm sure you all know how that goes sometimes.
Tim Densmore
On 7/27/2015 10:25 AM, Tim Densmore wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for recommendations for the best (least buggy) IOS for the
3800x. If anyone
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for recommendations for the best (least buggy) IOS for the
3800x. If anyone wants to share their opinion, or well-known gotchas,
I'd appreciate it. For now, all we really need is basic L2/L3 MPLS,
OSPF, and usual L2 features. Nothing fancy.
Thanks!
Tim Densmore
reasons for buffers on a unit like this is the speed
disparity between 10ge and 1ge ports, unless you're planning to do a lot
of shaping (rather than policing) - is this correct?
Thanks,
Tim Densmore
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
these serious consideration.
Thanks for all of the info folks!
Tim Densmore
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
?...Mark/Anyone else...can you please confirm if
this is correct?
I just fired off a clarification request. I probably asked for the
wrong part number or something like that - ASR-920-24SZ-M.
Tim Densmore
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
with the idea of
a router being the next step up from a switch, especially given that
we're looking at a quote that's around 4x less than what we have for
3800s. I'm a product line dunce, though, so any pointers would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
Tim Densmore
Yes, which I was stunned by as well - sub $10k for the asr, and $30k+
for the 3800, though that quote was several months old. I take it that
I should probably verify what I was quoted wasn't just a PSU or something...
Tim Densmore
On 3/23/2015 3:10 PM, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Hi Tim - Are you
On 11/7/2012 12:51 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I think you need to elaborate what this is.
Sorry. Considering the number of use /126 or /127 on P2P links
responses I got, I obviously didn't explain myself very well.
My aim here is to allow CPE, or CPE-connected devices to pull IPs via
Hi Folks,
Just a quick sanity check. I'm in the early stages of planning customer
IPv6 deployment and am trying to figure out how I'm going to deliver
SLAAC over P2P (ATM specifically) and QinQ interfaces for DSL or
similar, in non-PPP scenarios.
When I started poking around, it became
On 10/01/2012 10:31 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Tim Densmore wrote:
Stab in the dark, but have you verified you don't have a duplex
mismatch anywhere? IME, they can look exactly like that.
I seriously doubt you'd be able to get 30 megabit/s over somewhere
Stab in the dark, but have you verified you don't have a duplex mismatch
anywhere? IME, they can look exactly like that.
On 10/1/2012 5:03 PM, Eric A Louie wrote:
I'm inheriting a problem that I could use some ideas to troubleshoot.
Speedtesting from within my core to other locations within
On 8/8/2012 10:29 AM, Xu Hu wrote:
If yes, it is a normal behaviour.
Hi,
Can you explain in what circumstance this would be normal? IIRC, OSPF
has an AD of 110 and iBGP 200, so even if the routes weren't known via
connected, how would they randomly compete for space in the FIB? I
don't
Hi Folks,
I'm seeing a strange issue with multiple PA-POS-2OC3 cards where once
the card has been configured for APS, the port that had been the APS
protect will no longer show loopbacks they way I'd expect. Looping the
working side internally (loopback internal or simply looping fiber back
20 matches
Mail list logo
