Re: [c-nsp] cbgpPeer2AdvertisedPrefixes different than 'show bgp nei X advertised-routes'

Hi David, I've experienced the same in 5.3.3 ASR9K. so I think its not fixed yet. maybe you can explore BMP as the solution but make sure there is no memory leak due to BMP (eg : when server shutdown). Best Regards, Gobinath. On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:32 AM, David Hubbard <

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR99xx 64-bit upgrade 6.3.1 to 6.3.2

Hi Erik, The process is well documented in the following file (ASR9K-x64-docs-6.3.2.tar) . Its in the image download section. But as of i know you need a bridge SMU from 6.3.1 to 6.3.2 . Not sure 6.3.1 bridge SMU (CSCvf01652) publically available better reach out account team or open a case.

Re: [c-nsp] EVCs/BDIs/SVIs

BDI supports PVST also i tried with 3.10 S. I'm not sure its officially supported . one issue we faced officially GLBP not supported. If you are converting from IOS BVI to BDI please keep it in mind you are introducing a switch to your network. On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Chuck Church

[c-nsp] Ethernet CFM issue

Hi , I'm testing Ethernet CFM ,after the fault restored the link still down until i remove the CFM configuration : RP/0/1/CPU0:12K-1#show int gigabitEthernet 0/2/0/0 Wed Aug 28 11:58:45.240 UTC GigabitEthernet0/2/0/0 is up, line protocol is down 12k - IOS XR 4.3 with SDR i'm testing this.

Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet CFM issue

I'm missing some points (MIP's) seems to be , let me go through the theory again . Regards, Gobinath On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:01 PM, arulgobinath emmanuel arulg...@gmail.comwrote: Hi , I'm testing Ethernet CFM ,after the fault restored the link still down until i remove the CFM

Re: [c-nsp] Temporarily disable all forwarding on ASR9K

null0 doesn't cause the NHRP to trigger IMHO this will be a disaster . shut / no shut is the easiest but it doesn't simulate the whole part. real test comes when the modules crash when reloading specially after couple of years... :) what if we copy a empty config ??? and rollback the config ?

[c-nsp] XR 12000 Turboboot issue

Hi All, Anyone face this issue before . I've upgrade the OS to 3.6 to 3.9.2 through turboboot then i've applied the FPD and upgraded the mbus , fabric downloader ,rom . Then went to turboboot from 3.9.2 to 4.2.4 then hitting following error and router struck in XR PREP. Jun 06 14:21:03.496 :

Re: [c-nsp] Any BGP fine tuning recommendation while Peering in IX

understand but until L7 we can play around when it comes to L8 difficult to handle the protocols . On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: On 08/05/2013 09:50, arulgobinath emmanuel wrote: what are the common BGP fine tuning best practices while peering more than

[c-nsp] Any BGP fine tuning recommendation while Peering in IX

Hi all, what are the common BGP fine tuning best practices while peering more than 200 - 300 peering. except to the Path MTU , peer group i'm observing when the RR flaps CPU goes high ( GSR 12406 / PRP-2/ 12.0(33)S10 ) and due to that input queue on the interface goes high and it causes random

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

May be this is helpful : http://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/buffer.html Information here is by *rumor, innuendo and extrapolation*. Manufacturers rarely put info on packet buffers in their data sheets. On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Skeeve Stevens ske...@eintellego.netwrote: Hey all, **

[c-nsp] Old emails are re appearing in this mailing-list

I'm not sure the reason behind it , better check the date before replying or spending your valuable time. i already replied two emails that was send 2010 2011. Regards, Gobinath. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] NAT capacity on 2801

Better to leave the nat on Firewall / otherwise i think even 7206 also will boil down. On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:41 PM, García Fernández, Fernando fernando.gar...@tecnocom.es wrote: Hello Actually we are using NAT, route maps with static translations on a 2801. The traffic has grown and

Re: [c-nsp] ip debugging packet: tracking connections

Hi, Can't you use the Netflow to track the flow .. or traffic export just an idea [http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4t/12_4t11/ht_rawip.html] Regards, Gobi. On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Henry-Nicolas Tourneur hntourn...@autempspourmoi.be wrote: Hi dear, For one of our customer

[c-nsp] Black Hat: Routers using OSPF open to attacks

anybody actually know what is this presentation about ?? or is it the same well known attack ? http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-us-11/bh-us-11-briefings.html#Nakibly http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/080411-blackhat-ospf-vulnerability.html thanks, Gobinath.

Re: [c-nsp] Black Hat: Routers using OSPF open to attacks

. http://www.google.lk/url?sa=tsource=webcd=4ved=0CC8QFjADurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwebcourse.cs.technion.ac.il%2F236349%2FSpring2011%2Fho%2FWCFiles%2F2009-2-ospf-presentation.pptxei=nRk8TqTcIcPjrAf12JQYusg=AFQjCNGOeWzSyFV-RdjdgFq5J4QDBAGnTQ On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:00 PM, arulgobinath emmanuel arulg

Re: [c-nsp] Boot from TFTP

I think 2821 has usb drive. can't you try that i'm not sure whether it support normal usb but can test it and see.. http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/networking/using-a-usb-flash-drive-with-your-cisco-router/316 Regards On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Andriy Bilous

[c-nsp] IPv6 Prefix inbound filter

Hi all, what is the current industry practices in IPv6 inbound prefix filter is it /32 or /48 ? or it depends on the global IPv6 prefix growth vs memory ? Regards, Gobinath. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Prefix inbound filter

I thought the memory requirement might high but the total memory for /48 range routes and couple of static routes [show memory summary | inc IPv6] summing up only around ~4mb On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.orgwrote: On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, arulgobinath

Re: [c-nsp] 2950 and multicast, a cpu issue?

Hi, I don't have any idea reading IP Multicast Dat But this is consuming only ~5% according to your report . Can you post following output so we can isolate whether high cpu due to packet interrupt or processes. show proc cpu | exc 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% CPU utilization for five seconds: 7%/2% *(

[c-nsp] Handling Out of order packet

HI, When trying to load balance through 2 Ethernet paths (jitter 4ms - 10ms and delay 10ms) using per packet load sharing severely impact the throughput. (eg per path 90Mbps but when enabling both paths 30mbps ) . I suspect the issue due to the out of order packet. Is there any way similar to

Re: [c-nsp] Handling Out of order packet

Thanks All, the setup involved Fa1/0-Wireless Bridge || Wireless Bridge --- fa0/0 End HostROUTER 1 ROUTER 2 -- End Host ( Windows 7) fa1/1

Re: [c-nsp] Dual OC3 - Separate Carrier - Load-balancing 7201

out of order could be a major headache, and throughput could suffer greatly. I haven't tried nor experience in similar setup according to my search MLPPP designed to handle the out of order packet (rfc1990) but it can impact the router performance buffer space. Gobinath On Tue, Apr 5, 2011

Re: [c-nsp] linux based syslog viewer/GUI

Hi, php-syslog-ng I'm not sure this is the best but open source seems to be ok. http://code.google.com/p/php-syslog-ng/ regards, gobinath On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Brian Spade bitkr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi cisco-nsp'ers, Sorry for the non-Cisco question, but can anyone recommend a

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Routers: Performance benchmark

giving 6Mbps . any suggestion ? Thanks Regards, E.A.Gobinath On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:41 AM, arulgobinath emmanuel arulg...@gmail.comwrote: Dear All, Anybody have tested these values ( http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf) , since